|
From: Jim C. <gre...@yg...> - 2002-08-13 19:35:59
|
Gabriele Bartolini's bits of 13 Aug 2002 translated to: >> The 3.2 code is another story, as snprintf and gettimeofday are already >> used elsewhere in the code (and presumably gettimeofday is provided if >> missing, or it's not an issue (yet)), and 3.2 isn't under a feature freeze. >> So, go nuts on 3.2, but please tread ever so carefully on the 3.1.x branch. >> It's not the place to be testing new features, IMHO, unless you make a good >> case for it. > >Sorry guys for putting this into the 3.1.x code. I completely agree with >you Gilles. Portability is much much more important than a small and >frivolous feature such execution time. I agree with not adding this to the 3.1.x code, but it would be great if you could make a 3.1.6 patch available :) Jim |