|
From: Geoff H. <ghu...@ws...> - 2002-01-18 17:14:27
|
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Williams, David A. (DAWilliams) wrote: > I'm sorry to be late to the party with this. If there is any chance > that my forced results patch might be included in 3.1.6, I need to point out > the one bone-headed bug I've run across in it. This section (for htMerge): I haven't heard many requests for this sort of feature. And while it's interesting, my inclination is to aim for the smallest necessary changes in the production branch. So I'd hesitate to include an optional database like this. (It's not that your code looks bad on a read-through, but there may be unforseen bugs.) So I would point it towards the 3.2 branch as a possibility. I'm also not sure if this could be better done with a wrapper around htsearch and a separate CGI to retrieve your "suggested links" (even something in Perl would seem to work well). -Geoff |