Re: [htdig-dev] Problems with whatsnew.pl

[Jim C. <gre...@yg...>]

Hi - I think this was just joke gone wrong ;) There was a typo in
the original message that mentioned the year 2999, where I
presume 1999 was intended. That is the reason for the reference
to "a thousand years from now". Least that is my guess.

Jim

Geoff Hutchison's bits of Sun, 16 Dec 2001 translated to:

>At 11:57 AM +1100 12/17/01, Alexander Cohen wrote:
>>What? They are still working on 3.1.x almost a thousand years from now?
>
>OK, let's get some things straight. The point of a production branch
>is to fix bugs as they come up, so that people have a solid, stable,