From: <MV@PDV-SYSTEME.DE> - 2003-04-25 06:31:26
Attachments:
ssl.11
|
Hi! > redirect: https://xxxxxx.xx.xxxxx.org/members/ >=20 > Rejected: Not an http or relative link!pick: xxxxxx.xx.xxxxx.org, # It seems like the SSL patch was incomplete, or not applied completely. > I downloaded the SSL patch = (ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.1.6/ssl.10 > ), and attempted to apply it to a clean htdig 3.1.6 package as follows > (according to various documentation): >=20 > tar -xzvf htdig-3.1.6.tar.gz > cd htdig-3.1.6 > patch -p1 -l < ../ssl.10 >=20 > And I always get the following error: >=20 > missing header for unified diff at line 5 of patch > patching file Makefile.config.in > patch: **** malformed patch at line 22: DISTDIR=3D > $(top_srcdir)/../$(DIST) >=20 > Once again, I can't figure out why, so any insights would be greatly > appreciated. There's a line in that file saying "---cut---cut---here's the patch---cut---cut---cut---cut" Hmmm... what could that mean...? :-) I posted an improved version of Mari's patch on 23-Oct-2002. I'll append it in case you or someone else wants it (and boldly call it ssl.11). The differences are mainly that it - is governed by a HAVE_SSL macro. As I don't know much about autoconf, I didn't implement detecting and setting it in configure.in . - implements use of a RANDFILE for platforms that don't have /dev/u?random or EGD (like OpenVMS). This is governed by the macro SSL_NEED_RANDFILE. It's use is mandatory for OpenSSL 0.9.5+. - uses the more recent OpenSSL API rather than the old SSLeay one - prints SSL error messages Of course, OpenSSL has to be installed on your system, with the environment variable OPENSSL pointing to it. Hope it helps, Martin --=20 OpenVMS: | Martin Vorlaender | VMS & WNT programmer The operating system | work: mv...@pd... God runs the | http://www.pdv-systeme.de/users/martinv/ earth simulation on. | home: ma...@ra... |
From: Steven S. <St...@am...> - 2003-04-25 18:55:04
|
There's a line in that file saying "---cut---cut---here's the patch---cut---cut---cut---cut" Hmmm... what could that mean...? :-) Yeah, I did cut that line out ;) I tried with the ssl.11 patch as = well, and am still getting the same (or almost the same) error: patching file Makefile.config.in patch: **** malformed patch at line 24: DIST=3D = @PACKAGE@-@VERSION@ > redirect: https://xxxxxx.xx.xxxxx.org/members/ >=20 > Rejected: Not an http or relative link!pick: xxxxxx.xx.xxxxx.org, = # It seems like the SSL patch was incomplete, or not applied completely. Aye, I had not tried to apply the ssl patch at that point and figured = that was probably what was wrong. So the problem now is that the ssl patch = is not applying (above). Thanks for the continued help, -- Steven -----Original Message----- From: Vorl=E4nder, Martin [mailto:MV@PDV-SYSTEME.DE] Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 1:31 AM To: htd...@li... Cc: Steven Szymczak Subject: RE: [htdig] htdig 3.1.6 and SSL Hi! > redirect: https://xxxxxx.xx.xxxxx.org/members/ >=20 > Rejected: Not an http or relative link!pick: xxxxxx.xx.xxxxx.org, = # It seems like the SSL patch was incomplete, or not applied completely. > I downloaded the SSL patch = (ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.1.6/ssl.10 > ), and attempted to apply it to a clean htdig 3.1.6 package as = follows > (according to various documentation): >=20 > tar -xzvf htdig-3.1.6.tar.gz > cd htdig-3.1.6 > patch -p1 -l < ../ssl.10 >=20 > And I always get the following error: >=20 > missing header for unified diff at line 5 of patch > patching file Makefile.config.in > patch: **** malformed patch at line 22: DISTDIR=3D > $(top_srcdir)/../$(DIST) >=20 > Once again, I can't figure out why, so any insights would be greatly > appreciated. There's a line in that file saying "---cut---cut---here's the patch---cut---cut---cut---cut" Hmmm... what could that mean...? :-) I posted an improved version of Mari's patch on 23-Oct-2002. I'll append it in case you or someone else wants it (and boldly call it ssl.11). The differences are mainly that it - is governed by a HAVE_SSL macro. As I don't know much about autoconf, I didn't implement detecting and setting it in configure.in . - implements use of a RANDFILE for platforms that don't have /dev/u?random or EGD (like OpenVMS). This is governed by the macro SSL_NEED_RANDFILE. It's use is mandatory for OpenSSL 0.9.5+. - uses the more recent OpenSSL API rather than the old SSLeay one - prints SSL error messages Of course, OpenSSL has to be installed on your system, with the environment variable OPENSSL pointing to it. Hope it helps, Martin --=20 OpenVMS: | Martin Vorlaender | VMS & WNT programmer The operating system | work: mv...@pd... God runs the | http://www.pdv-systeme.de/users/martinv/ earth simulation on. | home: ma...@ra... |
From: Joe R. J. <jj...@cl...> - 2003-04-26 22:47:02
|
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Steven Szymczak wrote: > Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:49:19 -0500 > From: Steven Szymczak <St...@am...> > To: "[iso-8859-1] \"'Vorl=E4nder, Martin'\"" <MV@PDV-SYSTEME.DE>, "'htd...@li...'" <htd...@li...> > Subject: RE: [htdig] htdig 3.1.6 and SSL >=20 > There's a line in that file saying > "---cut---cut---here's the patch---cut---cut---cut---cut" > Hmmm... what could that mean...? :-) >=20 > Yeah, I did cut that line out ;) I tried with the ssl.11 patch as well, = and > am still getting the same (or almost the same) error: You must have a brain dead patch program on your system. Install GNU patch to avoid such problems. I have removed credit information from ssl.11 and put them in ssl.11.README. Regards, Joe --=20 _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah jj...@cl... |
From: Steven S. <St...@am...> - 2003-04-28 21:34:45
|
I installed GNU patch and now it won't patch at all. Just spits out: patch: **** Can't create file /tmp/poVANzvv : File exists Even after I clean out the /tmp dir. -----Original Message----- From: Joe R. Jah [mailto:jj...@cl...] Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 5:47 PM To: Steven Szymczak Cc: Vorl=E4nder; Martin; htd...@li... Subject: RE: [htdig] htdig 3.1.6 and SSL On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Steven Szymczak wrote: > Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:49:19 -0500 > From: Steven Szymczak <St...@am...> > To: "[iso-8859-1] \"'Vorl=E4nder, Martin'\"" <MV@PDV-SYSTEME.DE>, "'htd...@li...'" <htd...@li...> > Subject: RE: [htdig] htdig 3.1.6 and SSL >=20 > There's a line in that file saying > "---cut---cut---here's the patch---cut---cut---cut---cut" > Hmmm... what could that mean...? :-) >=20 > Yeah, I did cut that line out ;) I tried with the ssl.11 patch as = well, and > am still getting the same (or almost the same) error: You must have a brain dead patch program on your system. Install GNU patch to avoid such problems. I have removed credit information from ssl.11 and put them in ssl.11.README. Regards, Joe --=20 _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah jj...@cl... |
From: Joe R. J. <jj...@cl...> - 2003-04-25 07:48:14
|
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, [iso-8859-1] "Vorl=E4nder, Martin" wrote: > Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 08:31:16 +0200 > From: "[iso-8859-1] \"Vorl=E4nder, Martin\"" <MV@PDV-SYSTEME.DE> > To: htd...@li... > Cc: st...@am... > Subject: RE: [htdig] htdig 3.1.6 and SSL >=20 > Hi! >=20 > > redirect: https://xxxxxx.xx.xxxxx.org/members/ > >=20 > > Rejected: Not an http or relative link!pick: xxxxxx.xx.xxxxx.org, # >=20 > It seems like the SSL patch was incomplete, or not applied completely. >=20 > > I downloaded the SSL patch (ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.1.6/ssl.= 10 > > ), and attempted to apply it to a clean htdig 3.1.6 package as follows > > (according to various documentation): > >=20 > > tar -xzvf htdig-3.1.6.tar.gz > > cd htdig-3.1.6 > > patch -p1 -l < ../ssl.10 > >=20 > > And I always get the following error: > >=20 > > missing header for unified diff at line 5 of patch > > patching file Makefile.config.in > > patch: **** malformed patch at line 22: DISTDIR=3D > > $(top_srcdir)/../$(DIST) > >=20 > > Once again, I can't figure out why, so any insights would be greatly > > appreciated. >=20 > There's a line in that file saying > "---cut---cut---here's the patch---cut---cut---cut---cut" > Hmmm... what could that mean...? :-) >=20 > I posted an improved version of Mari's patch on 23-Oct-2002. > I'll append it in case you or someone else wants it (and boldly > call it ssl.11). The differences are mainly that it >=20 > - is governed by a HAVE_SSL macro. As I don't know much about > autoconf, I didn't implement detecting and setting it in > configure.in . >=20 > - implements use of a RANDFILE for platforms that don't have > /dev/u?random or EGD (like OpenVMS). This is governed by the macro > SSL_NEED_RANDFILE. It's use is mandatory for OpenSSL 0.9.5+. >=20 > - uses the more recent OpenSSL API rather than the old SSLeay one >=20 > - prints SSL error messages >=20 > Of course, OpenSSL has to be installed on your system, with the > environment variable OPENSSL pointing to it. >=20 > Hope it helps, > Martin Thank you Martin for posting it again. It is in: ftp://ftp.ccsf.edu/htdig-patches/3.1.6/ssl.11 The older ssl.10 is archived in: ftp://ftp.ccsf.edu/htdig-patches/3.1.6/0ld/ssl.10 Regards, Joe --=20 _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah jj...@cl... |