According to Fogaras Daniel:
> Thanks for your mail. The same problem appears in db.worddump, the
> words belonging to document ID 231 are not contained in the page
> http://www.mit.edu/people/asandqui/home.html (which is assigned with 231
> in db.docs). So it seems that not only the excerpts but the document IDs
> are also mixed.
That's interesting. Do the words in db.worddump for DocID 231 match up
with the words in the db.docs H field for 231? If so, it would seem that
it's not the db.docdb, db.words.db and db.excerpts databases that are
messed up, but rather the db.docs.index file. This latter database is
the one that maps URLs to DocIDs, so if it gets messed up, there would
obviously be confusion about which URL corresponds to which database
records in the other 3 files.
> We use 3.20b3 and you suggested to install 3.20b4. However, there is not a
> 3.20b4 version, this is mentioned as a "snapshot" with a sentence
> "Do NOT use this code unless you like living on the bleeding edge." Do you
> think these snapshots are stable?
The warning above is essentially a standard disclaimer. Because the
snapshots are just that, a week by week picture of the state of the
code in the CVS tree, we can't always promise that we won't have just
committed some buggy modifications. This does happen from time to time,
and we don't always catch it by the end of the week.
However, at the current time, the 3.1.6 snapshot is much more solid
than even the 3.1.5 "stable" release, and the current state of things in
3.2.0b4, while still only beta quality, fixes TONS of known problems in
3.2.0b3, so right now the snapshots are a much safer bet for both the
stable and beta development lines.
Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <grdetil@...>
Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil
Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Phone: (204)789-3766
Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) Fax: (204)789-3930
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.