On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
> The latest attempt is at...
Actually I have a newer version. But I found an actual *break* when
compiling with gcc-3.2 (aside from the header warnings). So I'm hoping I
can fix that and upload the new version soon.
Still, I agree 100% with Gilles that the key here is to start with some
profiling. I'd like to know why it seems so much slower than the current
3.2.0b4 version. I've done some, but more help and more eyeballs will
definitely help. I can confirm that the mifluz merge is more solid, but
I'd hate to having indexing slow down even more.
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.