From: Joe P. <joe...@sn...> - 2002-05-13 16:05:37
|
On Sunday 12 May 2002 05:14 am, David Paschal wrote: > > I can > > send a patch if you like. It would need testing though, especially on BSD > > systems, which I don't have access to. > Sure, bring it on. Here it is (attached). It seems to work pretty well for me, but it should get some serious testing. The patch improves the ability to find and use Qt tree-form installations, and can use a dislocated qt header directory if none is found in the Qt tree, but it doesn't deal with a situation where the Qt installation is completely scattered. It's still necessary for 'moc' to be located in a tree near libqt*. It also doesn't address the reported snmp problem. Some changes for the future could include letting the user specify the locations of all of the necessary Qt file types, by adding ./configure options like "--with-qt-library=<dir>" and "--with-qt-moc=<dir>". Checking for Qt headers is not as exhaustive as the libqt* search, but if they are not automatically found, the "--with-qt-includes=<dir>" option can be used. If libqt.so is missing, libqt-mt.so is used instead if available. The patch can be applied to current CVS with: hpoj ] $ patch -p1 <configure.in_05-13-02.patch -- Joe |