From: Joe P. <joe...@sn...> - 2001-05-24 03:47:57
|
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 09:13 pm, PASCHAL,DAVID (HP-Roseville,ex1) wrote: <...> > Looking longer term, I would still like to further reorganize the > documentation for 0.8. I'm considering changing the format from plain text > to HTML, to make it easier to hyperlink between different parts of the > documentation for the sake of walking users through basic installation and > linking to more detailed information about each command. Since I expect > everybody has an HTML viewer on their system these days, this shouldn't be > a big problem, but I would be interested to hear what other people think. > I probably will keep the HTML pretty light-weight just in case anybody > needs to look at it in plain-text modes (and also due to my poor HTML > skills:-). I may or may not provide Unix manual pages for the various > commands in addition to HTML versions. In any case, the documentation will > still be provided with the package as well as on the web, for both the > released and CVS versions, so web access will still be optional for reading > the documentation. Reformatting the documentation in HTML is a good idea, IMO. It would be much more readable. If you use only the basic HTML tags, you probably won't lock any users out. man pages could be useful as a quick reference. If you decide to supply them, they would not need to be very detailed. -- Joe |