From: Tim W. <tw...@re...> - 2001-01-01 12:30:43
|
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 11:10:34AM -0800, David Paschal wrote: > > It looks > > that access to some parport registers is now considered lowlevel=20 > > enough to justify hiding it from driver developers. > I can understand removing direct register access from individual drivers, > but I can't understand not providing an alternative interface. It's because of other architectures that don't even have those registers. Tim. */ |