From: Henrique de M. H. <hm...@de...> - 2005-08-12 03:47:17
|
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Mark Purcell wrote: > > device `hpaio:/usb/psc_1200_series?serial=<serial #>' is a hp > > psc_1200_series multi-function peripheral > > That is the hplip scanner I believe. Yes. Which means hpiod and hpssd will want complete, total, unshared control of the connection to the MFP device while scanning or printing. It does not care what happens to the connection during idle time (it closes and reopens the connection every time it processes a job, be it a scan, photocard access, fax or print job). > Hmm, That shouldn't be such a bad thing if hplip is taking ownership of the > scanner. I have recently removed the hpoj/hplip conflict from hplip in sid. Unfortunately, sarge retains the conflict. > That said if you download hpoj-0.91-5 from unstable that will actually allow > you to have both hpoj and hplip loaded together. It should co-exist on a > sarge box as well. IF the hplip packages are manually fixed to kill the conflicts header, yes. sorry about that. I will remove that header from backports, which should come soon to the hpijs alioth project. > I would recommend that if hplip works by itself, then that is prefered for USB > PSC's, if you have mixed usb and parallel then you should use both hplip > (usb) and hpoj (parallel) and if you only have parallel then hpoj is > prefered. Correct. hplip does not work with parallel connections. It could, but HP upstream won't write the code, and nobody seems to be willing to improve hpiod to do so. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh |