hpoj-devel

[hpoj-devel] insmod fails

[John S. <xf...@di...>]

Hi

I'm having trouble installing the ieee12844 modules from hpoj-0.7

My kernel seems to be configured correctly; the output from
/proc/config.gz shows the following:

CONFIG_PARPORT=m
CONFIG_PARPORT_PC=m
CONFIG_PNP=y
CONFIG_PNP_PARPORT=m

The parport modules all load ok, but the ieee12844 modules fail with
unresolved symbols as follows:

ieee12844.0 - global_bh_lock, synchonize_bh
ieee12844pp,o - same, plus tqueue_lock, mlcp_unregister, mlcp_register

Im using SuSe 7.0 kernel 2.2.16

Any help gratefully received

Thanks

John Simpson
http://dialspace.dial.pipex.com/john_simpson

Re: [hpoj-devel] insmod fails

[Jarl F. <ja...@di...>]

On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, John Simpson wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I'm having trouble installing the ieee12844 modules from hpoj-0.7
> 
> My kernel seems to be configured correctly; the output from
> /proc/config.gz shows the following:
> 
> CONFIG_PARPORT=m
> CONFIG_PARPORT_PC=m
> CONFIG_PNP=y
> CONFIG_PNP_PARPORT=m

Mine shows:
CONFIG_PARPORT=y
CONFIG_PARPORT_PC=y                                                                      
CONFIG_PNP=y
CONFIG_PNP_PARPORT=m                                                                     

> Im using SuSe 7.0 kernel 2.2.16

I use the same system.

But it should work with your config too :-?

Jarl

Re: [hpoj-devel] insmod fails

[Burkhard K. <bu...@bu...>]

John Simpson
> Hi
> 
> I'm having trouble installing the ieee12844 modules from hpoj-0.7
> 
> My kernel seems to be configured correctly; the output from
> /proc/config.gz shows the following:
> 
> CONFIG_PARPORT=m
> CONFIG_PARPORT_PC=m
> CONFIG_PNP=y
> CONFIG_PNP_PARPORT=m
> 
> The parport modules all load ok, but the ieee12844 modules fail with
> unresolved symbols as follows:
> 
> ieee12844.0 - global_bh_lock, synchonize_bh
These function calls will be undefined when you have compiled the
ieee12844 modules with SMP support and try to load them with a
non-SMP kernel environment.

Depending on what you really want, you have to reconfig your kernel
or recompile it. Or you might force non-SMP support by defining 
FORCE_SMP with a value different than "SMP" in the ieee12844/Makefile.

> ieee12844pp,o - same, plus tqueue_lock, mlcp_unregister, mlcp_register
These should all be consequences of ieee12844.o not being loaded.


Burkhard
-- 
Burkhard Kohl			bu...@bu...

Re: [hpoj-devel] insmod fails

[John S. <xf...@di...>]

Burkhard

My kernel isn't compiled with SMP support (from /proc/config.gz). I've
tried modifying the ieee12844/Makefile.in (then make clean etc.) both
with and without SMP support and I get the same result.

Any ideas?

John

Burkhard Kohl wrote:
> 
> John Simpson
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm having trouble installing the ieee12844 modules from hpoj-0.7
> >
> > My kernel seems to be configured correctly; the output from
> > /proc/config.gz shows the following:
> >
> > CONFIG_PARPORT=m
> > CONFIG_PARPORT_PC=m
> > CONFIG_PNP=y
> > CONFIG_PNP_PARPORT=m
> >
> > The parport modules all load ok, but the ieee12844 modules fail with
> > unresolved symbols as follows:
> >
> > ieee12844.0 - global_bh_lock, synchonize_bh
> These function calls will be undefined when you have compiled the
> ieee12844 modules with SMP support and try to load them with a
> non-SMP kernel environment.
> 
> Depending on what you really want, you have to reconfig your kernel
> or recompile it. Or you might force non-SMP support by defining
> FORCE_SMP with a value different than "SMP" in the ieee12844/Makefile.
> 
> > ieee12844pp,o - same, plus tqueue_lock, mlcp_unregister, mlcp_register
> These should all be consequences of ieee12844.o not being loaded.
> 
> Burkhard
> --
> Burkhard Kohl                   bu...@bu...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hpoj-devel mailing list
> hpo...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/hpoj-devel