Re: [hoc-users] NSRect/FOUNDATION_STATIC_INLINE functions

[David C. <dw...@dw...>]

Never mind; I have discovered that I should be using the data =20
constructors as the equivalent constructors, and I was wrong on the =20
other counts.  Sorry for wasting everyone's time.

Regards,

David

----
On Dec 19, 2005, at 11:17 PM, David Christensen wrote:

> Hey hoc-users,
>
> It looks like ifgen does not pull out the definitions for many of =20
> the geometry functions defined in NSGeometry =20
> (NSMinX,NSMaxX,NSWidth,NSMakeRect etc)=97understandably so, as they =20=

> are defined as inline functions.  So if we are wanting to create =20
> NSRects and manipulate the fields, it would seem like there would =20
> need to be a Haskell method of calling these functions (or =20
> manipulating the equivalent for the same underlying structures).  =20
> Do such bindings exist already, and if not, would these be =20
> considered special-purpose enough that something would need to be =20
> hand-tailored, leaving ifgen alone?
>
> Regards,
>
> David Christensen
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through =20
> log files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD =20
> SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id=16865&op=CCk
> _______________________________________________
> hoc-users mailing list
> hoc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hoc-users