Re: [HAPI-devel] ORM 001 and XML

[Eric F. <ef...@ne...>]

No error, just no change: it continued to use RDO. In fact, if I change 
the version number to 2.3.1, it still uses RDO (but perhaps there are 
other parts of the message that are not 2.3.1. kosher).

That is the right form, no? ORM^O01^ORM_O01

Eric

Tripp, Bryan wrote:
> Strange, I tried it too, and it worked for me.  Was there an error message
> or did it just continue to use RDO? 
> 
> Bryan 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Freed [mailto:ef...@ne...]
> Sent: Thu 2/24/2005 2:39 PM
> To: Tripp, Bryan
> Cc: hl7...@li...
> Subject: Re: [HAPI-devel] ORM 001 and XML
>  
> Thanks,
> 
> I changed the default mapping for version 2.3 and it worked, so that is 
> good.
> 
> But I also tried to add the MSH-9-3 field (illegally) to the v2.3 
> message but had no luck. Out of curiosity, what would MSH-9 look like if 
> I waned to use the ORM_O01 structure? I tried:
> 
> ORM^O01^ORM_O01
> 
> but it did not work.
> 
> 
> 
> Tripp, Bryan wrote:
> 
> 
>>Come to think of it, MSH-9-3 was introduced in 2.3.1, but you're using
> 
> 2.3.
> 
>>It's an explicit statement of the message structure, whereas MSH-9-1 and
>>MSH-9-2 give the type and event from which the structure can normally be
>>derived by lookup (e.g. ADT^A03 uses structure ADT_A01).  It's such a
> 
> handy
> 
>>field that HAPI recognizes it even if it shows up illegally in earlier
>>versions.  But maybe changing the default mapping is a better approach
> 
> with
> 
>>version 2.3.  
>> 
>>Bryan 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
Eric Freed
IT Manager
New Rochelle Radiology
914-633-7700 x339