From: Tripp, B. <Bry...@uh...> - 2005-02-24 14:49:57
|
Hi Eric,=20 > 3) LAT is not part of the ORM structure, it is an artifact of the segment being wrapped by the email: :)=20 =20 > 2) OK. I wanted to use XML to do various transformations with = XSLT...but if people don't use the XML much perhaps there is a reason and I should consider do the transformation in pure Java. I'm not sure if there is a reason other than tradition. Although if = you're receiving the messages in ER7 you might get better performance without = XML, just because you will parse and encode each message once instead of = twice. =20 > 1) Perhaps I don't know as much as I thought, but how can I specify = the message structure more explicitly than have ORM^O01 as MSH-9? And what is MSH-9-3, I have only seen two subfields in MSH-9, not three. Perhaps I am misunderstanding. Come to think of it, MSH-9-3 was introduced in 2.3.1, but you're using = 2.3. It's an explicit statement of the message structure, whereas MSH-9-1 and MSH-9-2 give the type and event from which the structure can normally be derived by lookup (e.g. ADT^A03 uses structure ADT_A01). It's such a = handy field that HAPI recognizes it even if it shows up illegally in earlier versions. But maybe changing the default mapping is a better approach = with version 2.3. =20 =20 Bryan=20 =20 |