From: Tripp, B. <Bry...@uh...> - 2003-05-27 22:01:01
|
Hi Mike, Thanks, this does seem like a good way to handle new fields that are introduced at the end of a segment. I don't think it would work so well when components are added to a field, or segments to a group. For example if a field changes from ID to CE, you would need accessors for both, which wouldn't be too much better than what we have now. I want to make sure you're aware of ca.uhn.hl7v2.util.Terser. It provides a string syntax for accessing primitives in a version-independent manner -- maybe this is what you mentioned for primitives in the current CVS code. You retrieve data with address strings like "MSH-9-3" and it will account for version-related differences. This is how the core HAPI classes deal with this problem. If Terser doesn't meet your needs and you don't mind the above limitations, then you're more than welcome to give it a shot and I'll try to be of assistance. > there a read-only instance of this DB somewhere that one > could connect > to? Or is it identical to what you get if you purchase the HL7 spec Worse ... it's sold separately (for $1200 USD!) Bryan This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not be that of the organization. |