From: Joe R. <jro...@sk...> - 2002-09-19 18:19:25
|
Bryan, Thanks for the quick response.. very much appreciate it..=20 Curious to know how well this product is working out for people.. I run = a healthcare / software company that builds products for lab techs, = nurses, docs, etc... We have some pretty big accounts and consider the = parser a big move for us. We have been using another parser.. but I really want to consider this = one... since it appears more object oriented... Any thoughts on this..? Also.. we are in need of some developers that have experience in = healthcare... hl7, etc... Do you know if there is a forum, newsgroup for = HAPI. Thanks, Joe Rosario President (Lead Architect) Skeva Technologies Inc. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tripp, Bryan=20 To: 'Joe Rosario' ; hl7...@li...=20 Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 1:03 PM Subject: RE: [HAPI-devel] HAPI question Hi Joe,=20 Recall that since version 2.3.1 there are multiple trigger events per = message structure ... A04 uses the ADT_A01 message structure (see = section 3.3.4) ... so to send an A04 you would do something like this:=20 ADT_A01 msg =3D new ADT_A01(); ... msg.getMSH().getMessageType().getMessageType().setValue("ADT"); msg.getMSH().getMessageType().getTriggerEvent().setValue("A04"); = msg.getMSH().getMessageType().getMessageStructure().setValue("ADT_A01"); ... Bryan=20 -----Original Message----- From: Joe Rosario [mailto:jro...@sk...] Sent: September 19, 2002 11:50 AM To: hl7...@li... Subject: [HAPI-devel] HAPI question I have a question regarding HAPI 2.4 support. The ADT_A04 message = class does not appear to be present. Was this an oversight or was = intentionally left out? Are there other message types that are not = represented in 2.4 classes. Thanks, Joe Rosario |