[Helidelinux-devel] Re: [Ogdl-core] linux registry
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
rveen
From: Rolf V. <rol...@he...> - 2004-04-01 11:15:22
|
Hui Zhou wrote: > I just spotted this project on freshmeat: > http://registry.sourceforge.net/ > > It tries to wrap all config files into a single API. I am thinking on > the same plot but using OGDL. After skim throught his document, I > found that he uses very similar path construction (eg. a.b.c.d) to > access the keys, which make it just natural to use OGDL. However, he uses > the directory tree to store the data (one file for each value) and I > speculate that most senior unix administrators. By adding the ability > to mixing directories with ogdl files, we can either use a single > registry file (like MS windows does), or use one file for each > application (as currently used in li(u)nix but all in the same > directory), or with any level of directories down to one file per key, > all through a single OGDL API. My thought was that a future dpath command would do exactly that. But the registry project has one advantage and that is security: each key-value pair has its own. On the other side, my question is: Is the unix security model good, or should we better think about ACL ? Rolf. |