From: Justin B. <jgb...@gm...> - 2007-12-26 18:19:52
|
On Dec 21, 2007 9:32 AM, Peter Gammie <pe...@gm...> wrote: > I can email you (== anyone who's interested) a patch that begins down > that road. Roughly, I added support for defaults, foreign keys and > primary keys. IIRC one can create tables with those things but the > reflection is a bit weak, and the data description types are not > fantastically robust. (The fieldnames are merely strings, e.g.) Sounds interesting, though I'm probably more interested in the reflection/representation side. Were those relationships able to be used in queries? In any case I wouldn't mind seeing the code. Justin |