|
From: Henning T. <has...@he...> - 2008-07-10 07:05:10
|
I found the idea of implementing grouping by the 'unique' statement rather
elegant, but its translation is not conform to SQL, isn't it?
do p <- table Points.points
r <- project (Points.c << p!Points.c)
unique
return r
Is translated to
SELECT C2 C
FROM (SELECT C C2
FROM POINTS T1
GROUP BY C2) T1
But the C2 after GROUP BY does not denote a column of a table. It may be
replaced by C or the GROUP BY may be moved to the outer SELECT statement.
|