Re: [Haskelldb-users] driver options -> driver parameters?

[Henning T. <has...@he...>]

On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Justin Bailey wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Henning Thielemann
> <has...@he...> wrote:
>>
>> As I understand the "options" like 'db', 'uid', 'pwd' for the HaskellDB
>> back ends are not optional and thus they should be better called driver
>> arguments?
>
> Sounds pretty reasonable, though a bit pedantic. What makes you ask?

I found myself adding a field 'requiredOptions' to the DriverInterface 
record, but then thought that options that are obligatory are not options.