From: Justin B. <jgb...@gm...> - 2008-01-24 22:10:42
|
On Jan 24, 2008 12:29 PM, Bjorn Bringert <bri...@cs...> wrote: > This looks good to me. Excellent, I'll polish it and submit. If you have any naming suggestions, don't hesitate to send them. > > I don't quite see why it would be necessary to add ExprTypes > constraints to the existing functions, since they don't use the > fieldTypes function. What is it that you want to be able to do? I'm still getting used to typeclasses and I see what you are saying. I thought that, in order to use fieldTypes on a given Query, I'd need to ensure all types used by that query had the ExprTypes constraint. Just a misunderstanding on my part. Justin |