Menu
▾
▴
hardhats-port-discuss — Porting VistA system general discussion
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: K.S. B. <k.b...@sa...> - 2005-01-12 19:04:24
|
Richard -- This is yet another forum that was created for the purpose for which you are using it, but which has not been active (for whatever reason). Just about all the action - and where you will get answers - is the list har...@li... and you join by going to http://sourceforge.net/projects/hardhats selecting Lists and joining. Regards -- Bhaskar On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 13:56, Martinelli, Richard wrote: > My reply to 'hostname' is Vista. However, when I installed GT.M I did > not have my Host named, it was localhost, did that make a difference? > =20 >=20 > Richard Martinelli > CDVA > (916) 653-2395 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Fort, Wally [mailto:Wal...@me...] > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 2:59 PM > To: Martinelli, Richard; > har...@li... > Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Vista Setup / Red Hat / > gt.m > =20 > =20 > You must not have done part of the naming of your Linux box. > The "localhost" comes from the Linux environment variable > hostname. > =20 > Try $ echo $HOSTNAME > and see what you get. > =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: har...@li... > [mailto:har...@li...] On > Behalf Of Martinelli, Richard > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 2:07 PM > To: 'har...@li...' > Subject: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Vista Setup / Red Hat / gt.m > =20 > =20 > =20 > My Linux host is named Vista, however when I type the command: > GTM> D GETENV^%ZOSV W !,Y it returns: > VAH^ROU^localhost^ROU:localhost. What GT.M command, if any, > will "update" the host name "localhost" to "Vista" in GT.M or > what steps do I need to take to get Machine Name localhost > replaced with Vista? > =20 > =20 > Richard Martinelli > CDVA > (916) 653-2395 > =20 *************************************************************************= ** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or = privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. =20 Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is = strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************= ** NOTE: Ce courriel est destine exclusivement au(x) destinataire(s) = mentionne(s) ci-dessus et peut contenir de l'information privilegiee, = confidentielle et/ou dispensee de divulgation aux termes des lois = applicables. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, ou s'il ne vous = est pas destine, veuillez le mentionner immediatement a l'expediteur et = effacer ce courriel. |
|
From: Martinelli, R. <Ric...@cd...> - 2005-01-12 18:57:33
|
My reply to 'hostname' is Vista. However, when I installed GT.M I did not have my Host named, it was localhost, did that make a difference? Richard Martinelli CDVA (916) 653-2395 -----Original Message----- From: Fort, Wally [mailto:Wal...@me...] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 2:59 PM To: Martinelli, Richard; har...@li... Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Vista Setup / Red Hat / gt.m You must not have done part of the naming of your Linux box. The "localhost" comes from the Linux environment variable hostname. Try $ echo $HOSTNAME and see what you get. -----Original Message----- From: har...@li... [mailto:har...@li...] On Behalf Of Martinelli, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 2:07 PM To: 'har...@li...' Subject: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Vista Setup / Red Hat / gt.m My Linux host is named Vista, however when I type the command: GTM> D GETENV^%ZOSV W !,Y it returns: VAH^ROU^localhost^ROU:localhost. What GT.M command, if any, will "update" the host name "localhost" to "Vista" in GT.M or what steps do I need to take to get Machine Name localhost replaced with Vista? Richard Martinelli CDVA (916) 653-2395 |
|
From: Fort, W. <Wal...@me...> - 2005-01-06 22:59:02
|
You must not have done part of the naming of your Linux box. The "localhost" comes from the Linux environment variable hostname. =20 Try $ echo $HOSTNAME and see what you get. -----Original Message----- From: har...@li... [mailto:har...@li...] On Behalf Of Martinelli, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 2:07 PM To: 'har...@li...' Subject: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Vista Setup / Red Hat / gt.m My Linux host is named Vista, however when I type the command: GTM> D GETENV^%ZOSV W !,Y it returns: VAH^ROU^localhost^ROU:localhost. What GT.M command, if any, will "update" the host name "localhost" to "Vista" in GT.M or what steps do I need to take to get Machine Name localhost replaced with Vista? Richard Martinelli=20 CDVA=20 (916) 653-2395=20 |
|
From: Martinelli, R. <Ric...@cd...> - 2005-01-06 22:07:57
|
My Linux host is named Vista, however when I type the command: GTM> D GETENV^%ZOSV W !,Y it returns: VAH^ROU^localhost^ROU:localhost. What GT.M command, if any, will "update" the host name "localhost" to "Vista" in GT.M or what steps do I need to take to get Machine Name localhost replaced with Vista? Richard Martinelli CDVA (916) 653-2395 |
|
From: <ldl...@ld...> - 2003-01-22 16:58:11
|
Hi,
I'm not sure which package I loaded (was latd I think)... but a
google search of "linux lat" will get you some pointers. As I
recall, it was a simple matter of using the standard recipe:
# tar xvfz <tarball.gz>
# cd <directory-created-by-tarball>
# ./configure
# make
# make install
There wasn't much to setting it up as I recall.
Am willing to help but don't have much LAT equipment here anymore.
Cheers,
--ldl
It is reported that Maury Pepper said:
>
> Chuck,
>
> This may be slightly off topic, but ... at the Malvern meeting we were able to get an open source version of LAT working on GTM. Larry Landis did the real technical work and I helped (stood around.) Details can be resurrected if needed. (Same as you, my reason was "how to dump MSM".)
>
> -maury-
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Link, Chuck M" <Chu...@me...>
> To: <rc...@br...>; "Fort, Wally" <Wal...@me...>; "Link, Chuck M" <Chu...@me...>; <har...@li...>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:34 AM
> Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M
>
>
> > We have a non-MUMPS system passing data to a VistA on MSM system, via their
> > serial ports. We are looking to duplicate that functionality so that we can
> > ditch the MSM system (and save well over $50,000 of the VA's money). (It is
> > a non-medical app.)
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Richardson [mailto:rc...@br...]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:19 PM
> > To: Fort, Wally; Link, Chuck M;
> > 'har...@li...'
> > Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M
> >
> >
> > Chuck and Wally;
> > What is required to have a TIA port definition? Chuck what
> > characteristics
> > are you looking for? Wally, I suspect that we might have defined a TIA
> > device somewhere for some VistA configuration. Perhaps we can start there
> > and see about getting some help from the rest of the community to complete
> > it for Linux/GTM?
> > Just a thought.
> >
> > >-- Original Message --
> > >From: "Fort, Wally" <Wal...@me...>
> > >To: "Link, Chuck M" <Chu...@me...>,
> > > "'har...@li...'"
> > ><har...@li...>
> > >Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M
> > >Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:40:24 -0800
> > >
> > >
> > >No, Even if I set up one I have no way to test if it works.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Link, Chuck M [mailto:Chu...@me...]
> > >Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:42 PM
> > >To: 'har...@li...'
> > >Subject: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M
> > >
> > >
> > >I haven't looked yet, but in the VistA ported to GT.M/Linux, are there
> > >entries in the Device file for the serial ports?
> > >
> > >TIA
> > >
> > >
> > >-------------------------------------------------------
> > >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com
> > >Understand how to protect your customers personal information by
> > >implementing SSL on your Apache Web Server. Click here to get our FREE
> > >Thawte Apache
> >
> > >Guide: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0029en
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list
> > >Har...@li...
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss
> > >
> > >
> > >-------------------------------------------------------
> > >This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't
> > >afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get
> > >hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
> > >www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list
> > >Har...@li...
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
> > Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
> > Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
> > www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
> > _______________________________________________
> > Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list
> > Har...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
> Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
> Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
> www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
> _______________________________________________
> Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list
> Har...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss
>
|
|
From: Maury P. <mp...@ie...> - 2003-01-22 16:19:41
|
Chuck,
This may be slightly off topic, but ... at the Malvern meeting we were =
able to get an open source version of LAT working on GTM. Larry Landis =
did the real technical work and I helped (stood around.) Details can be =
resurrected if needed. (Same as you, my reason was "how to dump MSM".)
-maury-
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Link, Chuck M" <Chu...@me...>
To: <rc...@br...>; "Fort, Wally" <Wal...@me...>; "Link, =
Chuck M" <Chu...@me...>; =
<har...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:34 AM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M
> We have a non-MUMPS system passing data to a VistA on MSM system, via =
their
> serial ports. We are looking to duplicate that functionality so that =
we can
> ditch the MSM system (and save well over $50,000 of the VA's money). =
(It is
> a non-medical app.)
> =20
> =20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Richardson [mailto:rc...@br...]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:19 PM
> To: Fort, Wally; Link, Chuck M;
> 'har...@li...'
> Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M
>=20
>=20
> Chuck and Wally;
> What is required to have a TIA port definition? Chuck what
> characteristics
> are you looking for? Wally, I suspect that we might have defined a =
TIA
> device somewhere for some VistA configuration. Perhaps we can start =
there
> and see about getting some help from the rest of the community to =
complete
> it for Linux/GTM?
> Just a thought.
>=20
> >-- Original Message --
> >From: "Fort, Wally" <Wal...@me...>
> >To: "Link, Chuck M" <Chu...@me...>,
> > "'har...@li...'"=20
> ><har...@li...>
> >Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M
> >Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:40:24 -0800
> >
> >
> >No, Even if I set up one I have no way to test if it works.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Link, Chuck M [mailto:Chu...@me...]
> >Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:42 PM
> >To: 'har...@li...'
> >Subject: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M
> >
> >
> >I haven't looked yet, but in the VistA ported to GT.M/Linux, are =
there=20
> >entries in the Device file for the serial ports?
> >=20
> >TIA
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com
> >Understand how to protect your customers personal information by=20
> >implementing SSL on your Apache Web Server. Click here to get our =
FREE=20
> >Thawte Apache
>=20
> >Guide: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0029en
> >_______________________________________________
> >Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list=20
> >Har...@li...
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't=20
> >afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get=20
> >hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.=20
> >www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
> >_______________________________________________
> >Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list=20
> >Har...@li...
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
> Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
> Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
> www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
> _______________________________________________
> Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list
> Har...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss
>
|
|
From: Link, C. M <Chu...@me...> - 2003-01-22 06:46:58
|
We have a non-MUMPS system passing data to a VistA on MSM system, via their serial ports. We are looking to duplicate that functionality so that we can ditch the MSM system (and save well over $50,000 of the VA's money). (It is a non-medical app.) -----Original Message----- From: Chris Richardson [mailto:rc...@br...] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:19 PM To: Fort, Wally; Link, Chuck M; 'har...@li...' Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M Chuck and Wally; What is required to have a TIA port definition? Chuck what characteristics are you looking for? Wally, I suspect that we might have defined a TIA device somewhere for some VistA configuration. Perhaps we can start there and see about getting some help from the rest of the community to complete it for Linux/GTM? Just a thought. >-- Original Message -- >From: "Fort, Wally" <Wal...@me...> >To: "Link, Chuck M" <Chu...@me...>, > "'har...@li...'" ><har...@li...> >Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M >Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:40:24 -0800 > > >No, Even if I set up one I have no way to test if it works. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Link, Chuck M [mailto:Chu...@me...] >Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:42 PM >To: 'har...@li...' >Subject: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M > > >I haven't looked yet, but in the VistA ported to GT.M/Linux, are there >entries in the Device file for the serial ports? > >TIA > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com >Understand how to protect your customers personal information by >implementing SSL on your Apache Web Server. Click here to get our FREE >Thawte Apache >Guide: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0029en >_______________________________________________ >Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list >Har...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't >afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get >hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. >www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp >_______________________________________________ >Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list >Har...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss |
|
From: Link, C. M <Chu...@me...> - 2003-01-22 06:29:21
|
Well, we've got to give it a go, as soon as we get GT.M and VistA installed. I'll let "all y'all" know how it works out. -----Original Message----- From: Fort, Wally Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:40 PM To: Link, Chuck M; 'har...@li...' Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M No, Even if I set up one I have no way to test if it works. -----Original Message----- From: Link, Chuck M [mailto:Chu...@me...] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:42 PM To: 'har...@li...' Subject: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M I haven't looked yet, but in the VistA ported to GT.M/Linux, are there entries in the Device file for the serial ports? TIA ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com Understand how to protect your customers personal information by implementing SSL on your Apache Web Server. Click here to get our FREE Thawte Apache Guide: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0029en _______________________________________________ Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list Har...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss |
|
From: Chris R. <rc...@br...> - 2003-01-22 05:19:31
|
Chuck and Wally; What is required to have a TIA port definition? Chuck what characteris= tics are you looking for? Wally, I suspect that we might have defined a TIA device somewhere for some VistA configuration. Perhaps we can start ther= e and see about getting some help from the rest of the community to complet= e it for Linux/GTM? Just a thought. >-- Original Message -- >From: "Fort, Wally" <Wal...@me...> >To: "Link, Chuck M" <Chu...@me...>, > "'har...@li...'" <hardhats-port-discuss@= lists.sourceforge.net> >Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M >Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:40:24 -0800 > > >No, Even if I set up one I have no way to test if it works. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Link, Chuck M [mailto:Chu...@me...] >Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:42 PM >To: 'har...@li...' >Subject: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M > > >I haven't looked yet, but in the VistA ported to GT.M/Linux, are there >entries in the Device file for the serial ports? > >TIA > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com >Understand how to protect your customers personal information by >implementing >SSL on your Apache Web Server. Click here to get our FREE Thawte Apache >Guide: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0029en >_______________________________________________ >Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list >Har...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! >Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. >Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. >www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp >_______________________________________________ >Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list >Har...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss |
|
From: Fort, W. <Wal...@me...> - 2003-01-22 01:41:45
|
No, Even if I set up one I have no way to test if it works. -----Original Message----- From: Link, Chuck M [mailto:Chu...@me...] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:42 PM To: 'har...@li...' Subject: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Serial Ports in GT.M I haven't looked yet, but in the VistA ported to GT.M/Linux, are there entries in the Device file for the serial ports? TIA ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com Understand how to protect your customers personal information by implementing SSL on your Apache Web Server. Click here to get our FREE Thawte Apache Guide: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0029en _______________________________________________ Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list Har...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss |
|
From: George T. <gt...@pa...> - 2003-01-21 17:01:19
|
Chuck asked yesterday:
> What is the best way to get routines and globals from MSM (Windows NT) to
> GT.M (Linux)?
GT.M works with each MUMPS routine as a separate file. This actually leads
to conveniences in terms of version control, patching, etc. Here is a
subroutine I wrote to output DTM routines to a file directory, let's say
"C:\mymumps\RSAVE\". Then I just FTP from that directory to my GT.M target
system, and don't have to worry about GT.M's intake routine %RI. The
file-transfer process must retain the case of the file name, with its ".m"
extension.
;
OUT ;
S PATH="C:\mymumps\RSAVE\"
X ^%ZOSF("RSEL")
W !! S X=0 F S X=$O(^UTILITY($J,X)) Q:X="" D
.O 10:("W":PATH_X_".m")
.U 10 F T=1:1 S L=$T(+T^@X) Q:L="" W L,!
U $P Q
--George Timson
|
|
From: <Chu...@me...> - 2003-01-21 05:32:49
|
Merci, tres beaucoup! -----Original Message----- From: Chris Richardson [mailto:rc...@br...] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:27 PM To: Chu...@me...; har...@li... Subject: RE: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Getting Routines & Globals From MSM to GT.M Chuck; Try %RI and %GI on GTM side. It seems to work pretty well. >-- Original Message -- >From: Chu...@me... >To: har...@li... >Subject: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Getting Routines & Globals From MSM to GT.M >Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:39:04 -0600 > > >What is the best way to get routines and globals from MSM (Windows NT) to >GT.M (Linux)? > >TIA > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: >SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! >http://www.vasoftware.com >_______________________________________________ >Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list >Har...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss |
|
From: Chris R. <rc...@br...> - 2003-01-21 05:27:53
|
Chuck; Try %RI and %GI on GTM side. It seems to work pretty well. >-- Original Message -- >From: Chu...@me... >To: har...@li... >Subject: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Getting Routines & Globals From MSM to GT.M >Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:39:04 -0600 > > >What is the best way to get routines and globals from MSM (Windows NT) to >GT.M (Linux)? > >TIA > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: >SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =3D Something 2 See! >http://www.vasoftware.com >_______________________________________________ >Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list >Har...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss |
|
From: <Chu...@me...> - 2003-01-21 04:39:37
|
What is the best way to get routines and globals from MSM (Windows NT) to GT.M (Linux)? TIA |
|
From: Link, C. M <Chu...@me...> - 2003-01-17 04:42:19
|
I haven't looked yet, but in the VistA ported to GT.M/Linux, are there entries in the Device file for the serial ports? TIA |
|
From: K.S. B. <k.b...@sa...> - 2002-11-23 14:58:50
|
Comments below. Regards -- Bhaskar On , November 22, 2002 at 21:22:30 (GMT+1300), Andrew McMillan wrote: > Hi All, > > Well, since I volunteered, and I now have the access necessary, I want > to start updating CVS to the 2.04 release. > > I have tagged the current CVS as 'foia-release' as a starting point, so > it is still possible to check that out (there have only been a very few > changes since the initial load, it appears). [KSB] FOIA releases come out on a regular cycle, perhaps every six months. So, it would be best to tag it also with a date, since part of our challenge is to try to keep the two from diverging. > I have one question though... > > Currently the CVS is split by module. > > This appears to me to be a useful distinction, but it will mean a longer > "$gtmroutines" for the standard setup. Possibly it will also mean > changes to ARJTGTM as well. [KSB] The longer $gtmroutines / $ZROUTINES paths will mean slower dynamic link times. If the typical VistA user will stay in VistA for long periods of time, this wont' matter, and the modularity of directories organized by module would be useful. However, for in-and-out use (like web access via CGI scripts), it could delay things. I tend to lean towards multiple directories, since in a production environment, as a practical matter, the object files can be moved into one big directory. However, this is only a mild preference rather than a strong opinion. > If we are going to consolidate files into a single directory as with the > .tar.gz of 2.04 then I should do it now, before I update files to the > new release, but I can see it being a bit more manageable to _not_ have > 17,193 files in a single directory. Using any sort of a GUI to navigate > such a project will be almost impossible I suspect - Nautilus tells me > that 'The folder "r" contains more files than Nautilus can handle. Some > files will not be displayed.' [KSB] This is also true with Eclipse (http://eclipse.org) that some people at Sanchez are playing with. I for one didn't have the patience to wait while it indexed thousands of files in one directory. > However somebody decided to put everything into one directory, and they > probably had very good reasons for that. Let's hear 'em! If nobody has > come forward with any wonderful reasons in the next few days, I will > take the code in 2.04 and apply it to the existing structure before > tagging it all as a "release 2.04". [KSB] The history of VistA is that it used M systems that stored the code in the database and didn't do version management. Ergo, 17,000+ modules in one directory. > Once that is done, I will add some documentation about basic CVS use in > multi-programmer projects, so that we can all use CVS as something to > enable development, rather than some sort of albatross depressingly > displayed around everyone's neck. [KSB] Excellent. Thank you! *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** |
|
From: Andrew M. <an...@ca...> - 2002-11-22 08:22:52
|
Hi All, Well, since I volunteered, and I now have the access necessary, I want to start updating CVS to the 2.04 release. I have tagged the current CVS as 'foia-release' as a starting point, so it is still possible to check that out (there have only been a very few changes since the initial load, it appears). I have one question though... Currently the CVS is split by module. This appears to me to be a useful distinction, but it will mean a longer "$gtmroutines" for the standard setup. Possibly it will also mean changes to ARJTGTM as well. If we are going to consolidate files into a single directory as with the .tar.gz of 2.04 then I should do it now, before I update files to the new release, but I can see it being a bit more manageable to _not_ have 17,193 files in a single directory. Using any sort of a GUI to navigate such a project will be almost impossible I suspect - Nautilus tells me that 'The folder "r" contains more files than Nautilus can handle. Some files will not be displayed.' However somebody decided to put everything into one directory, and they probably had very good reasons for that. Let's hear 'em! If nobody has come forward with any wonderful reasons in the next few days, I will take the code in 2.04 and apply it to the existing structure before tagging it all as a "release 2.04". Once that is done, I will add some documentation about basic CVS use in multi-programmer projects, so that we can all use CVS as something to enable development, rather than some sort of albatross depressingly displayed around everyone's neck. Thanks, Andrew. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew @ Catalyst .Net.NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/ PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St DDI: +64(4)916-7201 MOB: +64(21)635-694 OFFICE: +64(4)499-2267 Survey for nothing with http://survey.net.nz/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: <Chu...@me...> - 2002-10-17 20:15:24
|
http://www.maximumpc.com/features/feature_2002-09-24.html I bring this up because of the free bootloader he used, at http://www.xosl.org, that someone might find useful someday for a Linux/Windows install. |
|
From: K.S. B. <k.b...@sa...> - 2002-10-17 15:59:26
|
The URL for the GT.M technical bulletin on job interrupt is ftp://gtmuser:M37arZan!@ftp.sanchez.com/gtmuser/TechnicalBulletins/TB5-024.h tm Please note that the URL includes a password for the GT.M FTP site that does change from time to time (but is current as of this e-mail), so if it doesn't work at a future date, please contact Sanchez for the current password. Two packages that claim to be able to ghost/clone Linux disk images are at http://www.feyrer.de/g4u and http://www.partimage.org What is the best way to archive / disseminate (within the VA) e-mails like this with potentially useful information? Should I just send them to the large distribution list that I have sent other e-mails to? -- Bhaskar *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** |
|
From: K.S. B. <k.b...@sa...> - 2002-10-16 21:02:27
|
Two responses to the post, from Hardhats. First, from Wally Fort:
The following is a response by Wally Fort to the above on Hardhats.
The variable DIKCOD has the code being run at the time of the error.
If that is still in the symbol table do a "ZWR DIKCOD" (with out the
quotes) to see the actual code being run. That will give a clue to what
the problem is.
And one from Andy:
I apologize for all of the effort you may have put into this.
I am pretty sure this was caused by a permission error.
The apache service did not have write permissions to $gtmgbldir
Once that was changed I no longer received the error.
All I got was "<html><body></body></html>"
but no error.
-- Bhaskar
On Tuesday, October 15, 2002 at 10:39:15 (GMT-0400), K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> This is a copy of a response to several e-mails pertaining to VistA on
GT.M
> on the Hardhats mailing list.
[KSB] <...snip...>
***************************************************************************
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged
information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution,
copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited.
***************************************************************************
|
|
From: K.S. B. <k.b...@sa...> - 2002-10-16 16:19:13
|
On Friday, October 4, 2002 at 09:06:20 (GMT-0400), K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> These are my follow-ups to the conference call of Tuesday, October 1.
[KSB] <...snip...>
> Time to create a linked image
[KSB] <...snip...>
> Since this is a pure VMS step (GT.M creates VMS standard .OBJ
> object files from .M source code files) we should also see what
> Mark / Chip may have to add to this.
[KSB] The following ECO may also be relevant.
ECO Kit Name: VMS73_LINKER-V0300
DEC-AXPVMS-VMS73_LINKER-V0300--4.PCSI
-- Bhaskar
***************************************************************************
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged
information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution,
copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited.
***************************************************************************
|
|
From: K.S. B. <k.b...@sa...> - 2002-10-15 14:39:27
|
This is a copy of a response to several e-mails pertaining to VistA on GT.M on the Hardhats mailing list. First, a question about gtmsecshr. This is not something that users interact with and so has no user level documentation. It starts up when needed, and automatically shuts down. Here is a description from the technical bulletin about GT.M and security in the Docs section at GT.M's project page at Source Forge (http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2125&group_id=11026). "Although GT.M does not have a daemon to manage the database, it does have gtmsecshr, a "helper" program that is installed owned by root and which has the set userid bit on in file permissions - i.e., when invoked, it runs with a userid of root. gtmsecshr automatically shuts down after one hour of inaction. When a GT.M processes needs to signal another GT.M process and is unable to send the signal directly, it asks gtmsecshr to send the signal on its behalf, starting a gtmsecshr process if one is not already running." Note that for normal operation gtmsecshr must be installed as root and must have the set userid bit on in file permissions. The most common problem with gtmsecshr results from users bypassing the normal GT.M installation process (or creating their own, or simply copying a GT.M installation directory from one machine to another as a user other than root and not preserving file permissions). So, if you have gtmsecshr problems (or think you have), check gtmsecshr file permissions. This is what they should look like: -rwsr-sr-x 1 root root 272315 Aug 9 15:36 gtmsecshr Gtmsecshr also writes information about its action to the file in the gtm_secshr_log file in the directory specified by $gtm_log. This and the Linux operator log (/var/log/messages) are excellent sources of diagnostic information when you have (or think you may have) a gtmsecshr issue. $gtm_log is also discussed in the the technical bulletin on GT.M security, which is well worth a read. Andy reported a problem with an undefined variable. %GTM-E-UNDEF, Undefined local variable: X(1) %GTM-I-RTSLOC, At M source location XECUTE+18^DIKC George Timson seemed to think that this was a stack problem. Lloyd Milligan noted that he didn't see this with a different version of GT.M and a different version of VistA. Some questions, and requests, please to help isolate the problem: - George, what leads you to think this is a atack depth problem? - Has anyone been able to check whether X(1) is actually undefined at that point (either with a ZBREAK, ZSHOW dump or with Serenji)? - Has anyone tried using GT.M V4.3-001A with the newer VistA or V4.3-001B with the older VistA? Rebuilding GT.M with more stack is not hard (it's a 1 line change to a parameter in a file), but does involve downloading the sources and rebuilding, so I would like to make sure that that is indeed the cause. If there are GT.M issues, please report and discuss them at Source Forge (http://sourceforge.net/projects/sanchez-gtm)rather than on hardhats. The GT.M community (and developers) monitor the forums there, whereas only those involved with VistA monitor Hardhats. I will post this message at Source Forge in the VistA forum (http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=48761) where it will be easy to see and respond to. Regards -- Bhaskar *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** |
|
From: Link, C. M <Chu...@me...> - 2002-10-07 17:21:06
|
I have a server running Redhat. (I'll probably upgrade it to v8 this week.) I 'll get GT.M and VistA running soon. I would like to make this server remotely available to the BCMA people here. What is the best way to do that? SSH? And how do I go about doing that? Any and all help will be appreciated. Thanks, Chuck |
|
From: <Chu...@me...> - 2002-10-05 21:50:52
|
Thanks, I'll add it to my list. I was finally able to get onto mirror.hiwaay.net, a pretty fast FTP server. -----Original Message----- From: Bill Garrett [mailto:wga...@sc...] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:32 PM To: Chu...@me... Cc: har...@li... Subject: Re: [Hardhats-port-discuss] Redhat 8 Here's an unofficial mirror which is not overloaded yet. ftp://zion.physics.ncsu.edu/pub/redhat/8.0/iso/ On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 16:58, Chu...@me... wrote: > Redhat 8 has been released. Has anyone been lucky enough to find an > FTP site that' s not already backed up 'til 2003? > > (I'm hoping I can get the wireless to work with this version.) > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list > Har...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss |
|
From: Bill G. <wga...@sc...> - 2002-10-04 23:31:23
|
Here's an unofficial mirror which is not overloaded yet. ftp://zion.physics.ncsu.edu/pub/redhat/8.0/iso/ On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 16:58, Chu...@me... wrote: > Redhat 8 has been released. Has anyone been lucky enough to find an FTP > site that' s not already backed up 'til 2003? > > (I'm hoping I can get the wireless to work with this version.) > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Hardhats-port-discuss mailing list > Har...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-port-discuss |
