RE: [Hamlib-developer] Icom PCR1000 - trying to get going ...
Library to control radio transceivers and receivers
Brought to you by:
n0nb
|
From: <dar...@bt...> - 2002-03-07 11:16:53
|
Stephane, It's been a while but am still expecting to test a few radios over the next few months. Thanks for the notes on the PCR1000 - it was getting late last night and I thought I was going bonkers! I'll run a quick test today and post back here. Stephane: you mentioned there was an online resource for the PCR1000. Any chance of the URL? I might stand a chance of getting some of the other functions working once over this initial hurdle. Jim: Thanks for the note on the switch from 9600 to 38400 - I had a suspicion of this but no docs to back it up! Many thanks, Darren - G0WCW -----Original Message----- From: Stephane Fillod [mailto:f4...@fr...] Sent: 06 March 2002 23:00 To: dar...@bt... Cc: Hamlib developers Subject: Re: [Hamlib-developer] Icom PCR1000 - trying to get going ... Hey Darren, good to see you again! On Wed, Mar 06, 2002, dar...@bt... wrote: > Am I doing something dumb? I've used the pre-packaged Win32 app from Icom > which works fine. Using rigctl and testrig (radio 401) I seem to get no joy. > I have set the line speeds from 2400 to 38400, set to /dev/ttyS0, and from 7 > or 8 bits using cs7/8 etc, to be sure all is the same. Am using RH 7.0 and > the latest cvs release (downloaded yesterday). fine. Reading the pcr1k docs, it looks like the default line speed is 9600. I guess you already gave a look at the README.betatester file. Would it be possible to run "rigctl -m 401 -r /dev/ttyS0 -s 9600 -vvvvvv" and report the traces on the list or to me? The "-vvvvvv" is very important since it will show off the traces of the serial communication, giving hints where it breaks. Actually, I developped the backend from documentation found on the Internet. And obviously, I never got a chance to test it. But now, the time has come :) > Before I start delving into the PCR code and adding the other functions, I > was hoping to at least get a correct response back from the radio! Anyone > spot my mistake? mistake is not necessarily yours. Let's see what we can do with the traces. 73's Stephane F8CFE |