Hi Ernie,
[this message has been Cc:'d to hamlib-developer]
> I am getting a failure when attempting to compile hamlib 1.1.3....I've
> attached some of the warning messages from the point of failure.
>
> Any ideas?
You've just got a picky compiler. No big deal. Anyway, I'll try to make
everyone happy :)
BTW, which compiler is it? Isn't it some gcc3.x version?
I'm curious what "g++ --version" outputs.
> -------------------------------------
> (excerpted from make to point of failure)
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -I../src -I../lib
> -D_GNU_S
> OURCE -g -O2 -Wall -c rigclass.cc -MT rigclass.lo -MD -MP -MF
> .deps/rigclass.TPl
> o -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/rigclass.lo
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/3.2/backward/iostream.h:31,
> from ../include/hamlib/rigclass.h:225,
> from rigclass.cc:37:
> /usr/include/c++/3.2/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2: warning: #warning This
> fi
> le includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. Please consider
> using
> one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 of the C++ standard. Examples
> in
> clude substituting the <X> header for the <X.h> header for C++ includes, or
> <sst
> ream> instead of the deprecated header <strstream.h>. To disable this warning
> us
> e -Wno-deprecated.
Okay, I'm no C++ expert. For this one, I just turned
#include <iostream.h> to #include <iostream> (without .h)
> rigclass.cc:366: default argument given for parameter 2 of `void
> Rig::setRptrShi
> ft(rptr_shift_e, int = 0)'
> ../include/hamlib/rigclass.h:99: after previous specification in `void
> Rig::setR
> ptrShift(rptr_shift_e, int = 0)'
[...]
The default arg value was given both in the include and the source .cc file.
rigclass.h is sufficient, so I updated rigclass.cc.
Modifications are commited to the cvs rep.
Thanks for the report,
Stephane
|
