Re: [Gwt-openlayers-users] [Gwt-openlayers-devl] GWT-OpenLayersv0.5, let's please do a release...

[Lukas J. <luk...@de...>]

I agree with all that you say, but I also think that a 1.0 release would signal/give a promise that it's a complete wrap of OpenLayers, which at least wasn't true the last time I checked out the code (ended in me sending a path to the list with new features). Don't get me wrong you all done a great job but a 1.0 release promises a lot, are gwt-ol really up for it yet?

/Lukas

 

 

Från: Andrew Hughes [mailto:ahh...@gm...] 
Skickat: den 13 september 2010 15:57
Till: gwt...@li...
Kopia: gwt...@li...
Ämne: Re: [Gwt-openlayers-users] [Gwt-openlayers-devl] GWT-OpenLayersv0.5, let's please do a release...

 

Release is fast approaching, 1 minor issue remains but....

 

Would it seem feasible to have this released as v1.0.0 and not 0.5? GWT-OpenLayers is quite a mature and feature rich codebase now and I think the...

 

MAJOR.FEATURE.BUG 

 

....convention is far more suitable.

 

I also think that the initial impression of a 0.x version indicates that the codebase is juvenile and lacks features - I don't believe that to be the case here :)

 

Cheers

 

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Edwin Commandeur <com...@gm...> wrote:

Hi Andrew,

All for the better if you have progressed on #48.

12 months between releases is way too long indeed :(

Greetings,
Edwin


On 18 August 2010 12:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote:
> Thanks Edwin,
> I must confess I did more work on the #trac_ticket_48 branch - naughty me.
> This was two things...
> 1. I merged the default tip onto the branch (i.e. they are in sync)
> 2. I added a heap of maven configuration for maven based releases, this is
> something I would really like to do for 0.5.... get a proper release out the
> door and into central. It will also make releasing much easier in the future
> - hence we should look foward to major, minor AND bug fix releases :)  12
> months between releases with soooooo many new features, fixes e.t.c. is too
> long :)
> I'll push ahead and try and get this working asap.
> Cheers :)
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Edwin Commandeur
> <com...@gm...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> You are absolutely right, that we should get out a 0.5 release. You
>> should have the rights to do a release (or alpha release if you like),
>> but I don't know if you would be okay to arrange the release.
>>
>> - panel control => +1 for move to 0.6 (all widget toolkits have
>> toolbars that are far nicer than the Panel)
>> - #48 => if you can merge this, I would be all for that!
>> - other enhancements => +1 for move to 0.6
>>
>> Thanks for all the hard work you have already put into 0.5!
>>
>> Sorry for the low activity on my side lately. I hope to get things
>> rolling again soon...
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Edwin
>>
>> On 17 August 2010 08:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> > I'd like to propose that we try and get a new release of
>> > gwt-openlayers. Unless I am mistaken the 0.4 tag was created 12 Months
>> > ago
>> > :O
>> > According to trac 0.5 now has... 30 closed issues, 7 of which are
>> > defects.
>> > Remaining in 0.5....
>> > There are currently 6 Active tickets.... 5 enhancements, and one defect.
>> > Ticket #41 "Panel Control Not Working"
>> > - https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/41
>> >
>> > I notice that Edwin changed the milestone from 0.5 to 0.6 and then back
>> > to
>> > 0.5... can this be moved onto 0.6?
>> >
>> > Ticket #48 "Project Identifies and Multi Module Maven
>> > setup" https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/48
>> >
>> > This work's been completed on the
>> >
>> > branch... http://gwt-openlayers.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/gwt-openlayers/gwt-openlayers/file/46f69b5f9bd5 it
>> > has not been merged with the default/tip yet. I can merge this NOW if
>> > people
>> > want (it will help with the release too)? But if people don't want this
>> > in
>> > 0.5 I can also merge later (onto 0.6). I don't care either way 0.5 or
>> > 0.6
>> > but I don't want 0.5 to get held up any longer.
>> >
>> > Ticket's #20, #51, #1, #13 are all enhancements and I don't believe they
>> > should hold up a 0.5 release. Can we please move this into 0.6.
>> > In summary.... Questions:
>> > Should I merge down #48 to help with the (maven) release?
>> > Can ticket #41, #48, #20, #51, #1, #13 be moved into 0.6 so that the 0.5
>> > release can go ahead?
>> > If the answer is NO, then can I please do an alpha release...
>> > 0.5-alpha1?
>> > CHEERS :)
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > This SF.net email is sponsored by
>> >
>> > Make an app they can't live without
>> > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list
>> > Gwt...@li...
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl
>> >
>> >
>
>