From: Farrukh N. <fa...@we...> - 2010-08-25 00:52:04
|
Hi Andrew, The initial site docs look very nice. Thanks again for this valuable contribution. On 08/24/2010 07:47 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > Hi Farrukh, > > +1 for Jira :) > > *The maven site (documentation)...* > > It's early days, but I have deployed the tip/snapshot to sourceforge's > htdoc's (using mvn site site:deploy) so please take a look.. > http://gwt-openlayers.sourceforge.net/maven-site/ > http://gwt-openlayers.sourceforge.net/maven-site/apidocs/index.html (javadocs > too) > > If you have something add/fix/append/remove, please do so... you will > find the src under ./src/site of each module. > > * Site's are configured in ./src/site/site.xml. Including pages, > menu's layout e.t.c. > * Content can come from a few formats, and so far I've used APT > (almost plain text). You can see the pages in > ./src/site/apt/some-page.apt I recommend the apt qucik start > guide here > http://www.scottnesbitt.net/docs/apt_quick_ref.pdf (I'd also > recommend xdoc in some cases too, it's your call). > > Maven has really good doco about sites here: > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin/ > > I don't believe the site will or should hold up a 0.5 release, as we > can release much more frequently in the future - but it would be nice > to see this documentation site evolve quickly. The community needs > good documentation :) > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Farrukh Najmi > <fa...@we... <mailto:fa...@we...>> > wrote: > > > +1 on the proposed resolution of issue 48: > > https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/48 > > Kudos to Andrew for the terrific work to implement the proposed > resolution. > Kudos to Edwin and other dev team members for a lot of good work > leading > up to 0.5 release. > > BTW, we should consider getting a free hosted JIRA license for the > project. > It would be so much better than TRAC. Lots of SF projects are > doing that > these days that SF should just get a blanket deal with Atlassian. > > > On 08/24/2010 07:43 AM, Edwin Commandeur wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Andrew Hughes has been working hard to get things ready for a 0.5 > > release. One open issue is merging Andrew's fantastic work to make > > proper use of Maven onto the default branch. You can check out the > > improvements and see the new project dir layout by cloning the > > 'trac_ticket_48' branch. > > > > PLEASE MAIL IT TO THE DEV LIST WITHIN 2 or 3 DAYS IF YOU WANT TO > GIVE > > FEEDBACK ON THE MERGE!!! If you are not okay with the merge then > > please provide arguments about the how and why. > > > > All in all we think is a huge win, so we hope you'll feel the > same way. > > > > There will be three modules in the new project structure: > > gwt-openlayers (parent) > > gwt-openlayers-client (what is now gwt-ol) > > gwt-openlayers-showcase > > > > After checking out the project you can simply import the modules for > > project into Eclipse as an existing Maven project (requires the > > m2eclipse plugin). The documentation will be updated to describe how > > to debug it all without the Google Eclipse Plugin and how to get the > > showcase to work with the Google Eclipse Plugin (should work > with new > > versions of GEP). > > > > Building the jar: > > > >> cd gwt-openlayers-client > >> mvn package (or mvn install) > >> > > Running the showcase: > > > >> cd gwt-openlayers-showcase > >> mvn gwt:run > >> > > Building the new website > > > >> cd gwt-openlayers > >> mvn site (requires mvn install of gwt-openlayers-client, to > also build JavaDoc and link it in site). > >> > > Eventually the proxy in gwt-openlayers-client will be moved to > > gwt-openlayers-server. This is in line with gwt-maven conventions. > > > > Building the project with Ant is no longer supported, as we want to > > focus on getting everyting right with Maven. Also, the project > website > > will be generated from Maven. > -- Regards, Farrukh Najmi Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com |