From: Farrukh N. <fa...@we...> - 2009-03-10 20:02:21
|
Curtis Jensen wrote: ... > On that topic: > - I agree with the sentetament to stay with SourceForge over > bitbucket. IMHO the gain isn't worth the work. If we did change > source code repository sites, Google Code (code.google.com) would be > another one to look into. It would be fitting for a GWT project. > They only support SVN, but they have said that they are working on a > distributed VCS, but hasn't said if that is Git or Hg or both or > something else. > I admin projects at googlecode and SF. SF is much better. So -1 for me on moving away from SF. > - I like SVN over CVS (branching and merging is easier; even in > Eclipse). I wouldn't mind Git over CVS, but the conversion would be > tougher; not sure it would be worth it. Also, I'm fine with staying > with CVS. I think it'll be a while before SF supports Hg. If we're > waiting for that to happen before we do anything, we'll be waiting a > long wait. > I am happy to stay with CVS for now. Its less change. I can go with svn if there is popular demand. Thanks. -- Regards, Farrukh Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com |