Re: [Gwt-openlayers-devl] Mercurial branch

[Farrukh N. <fa...@we...>]

Hi Aaron,

Respectfully, I think creating another repo unilaterally is at best 
going to create confusion and at worst create issues for the team.
For starters, I will assume that repo is not integrated with the SF 
authentication mechanism. Please lets not create a parrallel universe
outside of the SF project.

At the end of the day this VCS debate is not what the project is about. 
I for one would be happy with any VCS as long as it is hosted at 
sourceforge, integrated with SF identity management and is supported and 
backed up by SF. That choice presently is cvs, svn and git.
As I said, SF willlikely have hg very soon. I am happy to wait for hg at 
SF and stay with CVS. I am also happy to move to git now. I am happy to 
move to svn if we do not plan to move again to hg or git. I am most 
unhappy moving out of SF.

Just my 2 cents.

Thanks and I hope you do not mind me speaking frankly and with complete 
respect for you.

Aaron Novstrup wrote:
> In case anyone's interested in toying with hg, I've created a clone of 
> the gwt-openlayers repository here: 
> http://bitbucket.org/anovstrup/gwt-openlayers/
>
> I didn't take the time to check how the conversion went, so let me 
> know if you notice any weirdness.
>


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com