Menu
▾
▴
gwt-openlayers-users — Users list. Moderately active.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(17) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(35) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: David R R. <drr...@op...> - 2010-09-23 14:28:02
|
Also, if I get the data back as HTML will I still have a collection of
features from which I can get the LonLat? Thanks, David
On 9/23/2010 10:06 AM, David R Robison wrote:
> Also I don't see
>
> .setLayers(arrayOfLayersToQuery))
>
> in the latest code. David
>
>
> On 9/23/2010 9:58 AM, Lukas Johansson wrote:
>> Basicly like this, (copy pasted from our working code, but you get the idea).
>>
>> WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions options = new WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions();
>> options.setLayers(arrayOfLayersToQuery));
>> options.setDrillDown(true);
>> options.setQueryVisible(true);
>> options.setInfoFormat("application/vnd.ogc.gml"); //return result as gml
>>
>>
>> public void onGetFeatureInfo(GetFeatureInfoEvent eventObject) {
>> VectorFeature[] features = eventObject.getFeatures();
>> String html = "foo";
>> FrameCloud popup = new FramedCloud("MapFeaturePopup", features[0].getCenterLonLat(), new Size(300, 400), html);
>> }
>>
>> /Lukas
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
>> Från: David R Robison [mailto:drr...@op...]
>> Skickat: den 23 september 2010 15:41
>> Till: gwt...@li...
>> Ämne: [Gwt-openlayers-users] WMSGetFeatureInfo and AnchoredBubble
>>
>> I am using the latest gwt-openlayers source. I an usingthe
>> WMSGetFeatureInfo control. In the onGetFeatureInfo event listener I am
>> trying to create and AnchoredBubble to display the results of the
>> WMSGetFeatureInfo. How do I get the LonLat from the GetFeatureInfoEvent
>> to pass to the AnchoredBubble constructor? Also it would be nice to be
>> able to set the layers to query in the WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions. David
>>
--
David R Robison
Open Roads Consulting, Inc.
103 Watson Road, Chesapeake, VA 23320
phone: (757) 546-3401
e-mail: drr...@op...
web: http://openroadsconsulting.com
blog: http://therobe.blogspot.com
book: http://www.xulonpress.com/bookstore/bookdetail.php?PB_ISBN=9781597816526
This e-mail communication (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged material intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should immediately stop reading this message and delete it from all computers that it resides on. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying or other use of this communication (or its attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately.
|
|
From: David R R. <drr...@op...> - 2010-09-23 14:14:26
|
eventObject.getFeatures() does not seem to exist in the GetFeatureInfoEvent in the latest sources. Am I missing something?
David
On 9/23/2010 9:58 AM, Lukas Johansson wrote:
> Basicly like this, (copy pasted from our working code, but you get the idea).
>
> WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions options = new WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions();
> options.setLayers(arrayOfLayersToQuery));
> options.setDrillDown(true);
> options.setQueryVisible(true);
> options.setInfoFormat("application/vnd.ogc.gml"); //return result as gml
>
>
> public void onGetFeatureInfo(GetFeatureInfoEvent eventObject) {
> VectorFeature[] features = eventObject.getFeatures();
> String html = "foo";
> FrameCloud popup = new FramedCloud("MapFeaturePopup", features[0].getCenterLonLat(), new Size(300, 400), html);
> }
>
> /Lukas
>
>
>
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: David R Robison [mailto:drr...@op...]
> Skickat: den 23 september 2010 15:41
> Till: gwt...@li...
> Ämne: [Gwt-openlayers-users] WMSGetFeatureInfo and AnchoredBubble
>
> I am using the latest gwt-openlayers source. I an usingthe
> WMSGetFeatureInfo control. In the onGetFeatureInfo event listener I am
> trying to create and AnchoredBubble to display the results of the
> WMSGetFeatureInfo. How do I get the LonLat from the GetFeatureInfoEvent
> to pass to the AnchoredBubble constructor? Also it would be nice to be
> able to set the layers to query in the WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions. David
>
--
David R Robison
Open Roads Consulting, Inc.
103 Watson Road, Chesapeake, VA 23320
phone: (757) 546-3401
e-mail: drr...@op...
web: http://openroadsconsulting.com
blog: http://therobe.blogspot.com
book: http://www.xulonpress.com/bookstore/bookdetail.php?PB_ISBN=9781597816526
This e-mail communication (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged material intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should immediately stop reading this message and delete it from all computers that it resides on. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying or other use of this communication (or its attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately.
|
|
From: David R R. <drr...@op...> - 2010-09-23 14:08:41
|
Also I don't see
.setLayers(arrayOfLayersToQuery))
in the latest code. David
On 9/23/2010 9:58 AM, Lukas Johansson wrote:
> Basicly like this, (copy pasted from our working code, but you get the idea).
>
> WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions options = new WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions();
> options.setLayers(arrayOfLayersToQuery));
> options.setDrillDown(true);
> options.setQueryVisible(true);
> options.setInfoFormat("application/vnd.ogc.gml"); //return result as gml
>
>
> public void onGetFeatureInfo(GetFeatureInfoEvent eventObject) {
> VectorFeature[] features = eventObject.getFeatures();
> String html = "foo";
> FrameCloud popup = new FramedCloud("MapFeaturePopup", features[0].getCenterLonLat(), new Size(300, 400), html);
> }
>
> /Lukas
>
>
>
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: David R Robison [mailto:drr...@op...]
> Skickat: den 23 september 2010 15:41
> Till: gwt...@li...
> Ämne: [Gwt-openlayers-users] WMSGetFeatureInfo and AnchoredBubble
>
> I am using the latest gwt-openlayers source. I an usingthe
> WMSGetFeatureInfo control. In the onGetFeatureInfo event listener I am
> trying to create and AnchoredBubble to display the results of the
> WMSGetFeatureInfo. How do I get the LonLat from the GetFeatureInfoEvent
> to pass to the AnchoredBubble constructor? Also it would be nice to be
> able to set the layers to query in the WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions. David
>
--
David R Robison
Open Roads Consulting, Inc.
103 Watson Road, Chesapeake, VA 23320
phone: (757) 546-3401
e-mail: drr...@op...
web: http://openroadsconsulting.com
blog: http://therobe.blogspot.com
book: http://www.xulonpress.com/bookstore/bookdetail.php?PB_ISBN=9781597816526
This e-mail communication (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged material intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should immediately stop reading this message and delete it from all computers that it resides on. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying or other use of this communication (or its attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately.
|
|
From: Lukas J. <luk...@de...> - 2010-09-23 13:57:08
|
Basicly like this, (copy pasted from our working code, but you get the idea).
WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions options = new WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions();
options.setLayers(arrayOfLayersToQuery));
options.setDrillDown(true);
options.setQueryVisible(true);
options.setInfoFormat("application/vnd.ogc.gml"); //return result as gml
public void onGetFeatureInfo(GetFeatureInfoEvent eventObject) {
VectorFeature[] features = eventObject.getFeatures();
String html = "foo";
FrameCloud popup = new FramedCloud("MapFeaturePopup", features[0].getCenterLonLat(), new Size(300, 400), html);
}
/Lukas
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: David R Robison [mailto:drr...@op...]
Skickat: den 23 september 2010 15:41
Till: gwt...@li...
Ämne: [Gwt-openlayers-users] WMSGetFeatureInfo and AnchoredBubble
I am using the latest gwt-openlayers source. I an usingthe
WMSGetFeatureInfo control. In the onGetFeatureInfo event listener I am
trying to create and AnchoredBubble to display the results of the
WMSGetFeatureInfo. How do I get the LonLat from the GetFeatureInfoEvent
to pass to the AnchoredBubble constructor? Also it would be nice to be
able to set the layers to query in the WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions. David
--
David R Robison
Open Roads Consulting, Inc.
103 Watson Road, Chesapeake, VA 23320
phone: (757) 546-3401
e-mail: drr...@op...
web: http://openroadsconsulting.com
blog: http://therobe.blogspot.com
book:
http://www.xulonpress.com/bookstore/bookdetail.php?PB_ISBN=9781597816526
This e-mail communication (including any attachments) may contain
confidential and/or privileged material intended solely for the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient, you should immediately stop reading this message and
delete it from all computers that it resides on. Any unauthorized
reading, distribution, copying or other use of this communication (or
its attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Gwt-openlayers-users mailing list
Gwt...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-users
|
|
From: David R R. <drr...@op...> - 2010-09-23 13:40:50
|
I am using the latest gwt-openlayers source. I an usingthe WMSGetFeatureInfo control. In the onGetFeatureInfo event listener I am trying to create and AnchoredBubble to display the results of the WMSGetFeatureInfo. How do I get the LonLat from the GetFeatureInfoEvent to pass to the AnchoredBubble constructor? Also it would be nice to be able to set the layers to query in the WMSGetFeatureInfoOptions. David -- David R Robison Open Roads Consulting, Inc. 103 Watson Road, Chesapeake, VA 23320 phone: (757) 546-3401 e-mail: drr...@op... web: http://openroadsconsulting.com blog: http://therobe.blogspot.com book: http://www.xulonpress.com/bookstore/bookdetail.php?PB_ISBN=9781597816526 This e-mail communication (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged material intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should immediately stop reading this message and delete it from all computers that it resides on. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying or other use of this communication (or its attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. |
|
From: Edwin C. <com...@gm...> - 2010-09-15 15:56:15
|
Hi Andrew, Given a small window for doco, and if no-one has objections then I would propose to set the date on monday 20th of september. A nice even number :) and it gives us the weekend. Andrew, since you have put the hard work in making the 0.5 release happen, please let me know if you think the date should be set earlier (e.g. coming friday) or later. Greetings, Edwin P.S. I recently started looking at Blogger (http://ecommandeur.blogspot.com/), so a GWT-OL 0.5 release woul be a nice topic for a first blog. On 15 September 2010 17:22, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: > UPDATE: > The remaining known bug blocking the 0.5 release has been fixed (changeset > 322) (NOTE: this is NOT v1.0.0, one day we will get there :D) > The plan... speak up if you don't like this.... But I will merge > trac_ticket_48 prior to the release and I will close out the trac_ticket_48 > branch. Speak up if this is not ok. Also, micouz's recent (default) > changesets have been merged onto the trac_ticket_48 branch (so they too will > be in the 0.5 release). > All seems good to go, there's a small window for doco if anyone's keen. > Edwin, would you like to propose a date? > Cheers > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Couzic Mikael <mik...@gm...> > wrote: >> >> Well, it is true there has been many new features since 0.4, but I agree >> with Lukas, version 1.0 carries a meaning of "Mission Accomplished" and >> GWT-OpenLayers doesn't cover completely the API of OpenLayers yet. It's not >> a big deal for us contributors, we have the development environment all set >> and it's fast and easy (well, most of the time ^^) for us to just implement >> what's missing when we need it, but a new user would expect a 1.0 version to >> have all the functionnality he would get by coding directly to the JS API. >> All in all, I don't think a 0.x version is problematic, I believe users >> will look at the dynamism of the community more than the version numbers, >> which are pretty much arbitrary after all. And the project doesn't look so >> bad on ohloh.net : >> http://www.ohloh.net/p/gwt-openlayers >> >> 2010/9/13 Lukas Johansson <luk...@de...> >>> >>> I agree with all that you say, but I also think that a 1.0 release would >>> signal/give a promise that it’s a complete wrap of OpenLayers, which at >>> least wasn’t true the last time I checked out the code (ended in me sending >>> a path to the list with new features). Don’t get me wrong you all done a >>> great job but a 1.0 release promises a lot, are gwt-ol really up for it yet? >>> >>> /Lukas >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Från: Andrew Hughes [mailto:ahh...@gm...] >>> Skickat: den 13 september 2010 15:57 >>> Till: gwt...@li... >>> Kopia: gwt...@li... >>> Ämne: Re: [Gwt-openlayers-users] [Gwt-openlayers-devl] >>> GWT-OpenLayersv0.5, let's please do a release... >>> >>> >>> >>> Release is fast approaching, 1 minor issue remains but.... >>> >>> >>> >>> Would it seem feasible to have this released as v1.0.0 and not 0.5? >>> GWT-OpenLayers is quite a mature and feature rich codebase now and I think >>> the... >>> >>> >>> >>> MAJOR.FEATURE.BUG >>> >>> >>> >>> ....convention is far more suitable. >>> >>> >>> >>> I also think that the initial impression of a 0.x version indicates that >>> the codebase is juvenile and lacks features - I don't believe that to be the >>> case here :) >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Edwin Commandeur >>> <com...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Andrew, >>> >>> All for the better if you have progressed on #48. >>> >>> 12 months between releases is way too long indeed :( >>> >>> Greetings, >>> Edwin >>> >>> On 18 August 2010 12:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: >>> > Thanks Edwin, >>> > I must confess I did more work on the #trac_ticket_48 branch - naughty >>> > me. >>> > This was two things... >>> > 1. I merged the default tip onto the branch (i.e. they are in sync) >>> > 2. I added a heap of maven configuration for maven based releases, this >>> > is >>> > something I would really like to do for 0.5.... get a proper release >>> > out the >>> > door and into central. It will also make releasing much easier in the >>> > future >>> > - hence we should look foward to major, minor AND bug fix releases :) >>> > 12 >>> > months between releases with soooooo many new features, fixes e.t.c. is >>> > too >>> > long :) >>> > I'll push ahead and try and get this working asap. >>> > Cheers :) >>> > >>> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Edwin Commandeur >>> > <com...@gm...> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi Andrew, >>> >> >>> >> You are absolutely right, that we should get out a 0.5 release. You >>> >> should have the rights to do a release (or alpha release if you like), >>> >> but I don't know if you would be okay to arrange the release. >>> >> >>> >> - panel control => +1 for move to 0.6 (all widget toolkits have >>> >> toolbars that are far nicer than the Panel) >>> >> - #48 => if you can merge this, I would be all for that! >>> >> - other enhancements => +1 for move to 0.6 >>> >> >>> >> Thanks for all the hard work you have already put into 0.5! >>> >> >>> >> Sorry for the low activity on my side lately. I hope to get things >>> >> rolling again soon... >>> >> >>> >> Greetings, >>> >> Edwin >>> >> >>> >> On 17 August 2010 08:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: >>> >> > Hi All, >>> >> > I'd like to propose that we try and get a new release of >>> >> > gwt-openlayers. Unless I am mistaken the 0.4 tag was created 12 >>> >> > Months >>> >> > ago >>> >> > :O >>> >> > According to trac 0.5 now has... 30 closed issues, 7 of which are >>> >> > defects. >>> >> > Remaining in 0.5.... >>> >> > There are currently 6 Active tickets.... 5 enhancements, and one >>> >> > defect. >>> >> > Ticket #41 "Panel Control Not Working" >>> >> > - https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/41 >>> >> > >>> >> > I notice that Edwin changed the milestone from 0.5 to 0.6 and then >>> >> > back >>> >> > to >>> >> > 0.5... can this be moved onto 0.6? >>> >> > >>> >> > Ticket #48 "Project Identifies and Multi Module Maven >>> >> > setup" https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/48 >>> >> > >>> >> > This work's been completed on the >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > branch... http://gwt-openlayers.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/gwt-openlayers/gwt-openlayers/file/46f69b5f9bd5 it >>> >> > has not been merged with the default/tip yet. I can merge this NOW >>> >> > if >>> >> > people >>> >> > want (it will help with the release too)? But if people don't want >>> >> > this >>> >> > in >>> >> > 0.5 I can also merge later (onto 0.6). I don't care either way 0.5 >>> >> > or >>> >> > 0.6 >>> >> > but I don't want 0.5 to get held up any longer. >>> >> > >>> >> > Ticket's #20, #51, #1, #13 are all enhancements and I don't believe >>> >> > they >>> >> > should hold up a 0.5 release. Can we please move this into 0.6. >>> >> > In summary.... Questions: >>> >> > Should I merge down #48 to help with the (maven) release? >>> >> > Can ticket #41, #48, #20, #51, #1, #13 be moved into 0.6 so that the >>> >> > 0.5 >>> >> > release can go ahead? >>> >> > If the answer is NO, then can I please do an alpha release... >>> >> > 0.5-alpha1? >>> >> > CHEERS :) >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >> > This SF.net email is sponsored by >>> >> > >>> >> > Make an app they can't live without >>> >> > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >>> >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list >>> >> > Gwt...@li... >>> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances >>> and start using them to simplify application deployment and >>> accelerate your shift to cloud computing >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gwt-openlayers-users mailing list >>> Gwt...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-users >>> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list > Gwt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl > > |
|
From: Andrew H. <ahh...@gm...> - 2010-09-15 15:22:34
|
UPDATE: The remaining known bug blocking the 0.5 release has been fixed (changeset 322<http://gwt-openlayers.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/gwt-openlayers/gwt-openlayers/rev/99c067afecb8>) (NOTE: this is NOT v1.0.0, one day we will get there :D) The plan... speak up if you don't like this.... But I will merge trac_ticket_48 prior to the release and I will close out the trac_ticket_48 branch. Speak up if this is not ok. Also, micouz's recent (default) changesets have been merged onto the trac_ticket_48 branch (so they too will be in the 0.5 release). All seems good to go, there's a small window for doco if anyone's keen. Edwin, would you like to propose a date? Cheers On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Couzic Mikael <mik...@gm...>wrote: > Well, it is true there has been many new features since 0.4, but I agree > with Lukas, version 1.0 carries a meaning of "Mission Accomplished" and > GWT-OpenLayers doesn't cover completely the API of OpenLayers yet. It's not > a big deal for us contributors, we have the development environment all set > and it's fast and easy (well, most of the time ^^) for us to just implement > what's missing when we need it, but a new user would expect a 1.0 version to > have all the functionnality he would get by coding directly to the JS API. > All in all, I don't think a 0.x version is problematic, I believe users > will look at the dynamism of the community more than the version numbers, > which are pretty much arbitrary after all. And the project doesn't look so > bad on ohloh.net : > http://www.ohloh.net/p/gwt-openlayers > > > 2010/9/13 Lukas Johansson <luk...@de...> > >> I agree with all that you say, but I also think that a 1.0 release would >> signal/give a promise that it’s a complete wrap of OpenLayers, which at >> least wasn’t true the last time I checked out the code (ended in me sending >> a path to the list with new features). Don’t get me wrong you all done a >> great job but a 1.0 release promises a lot, are gwt-ol really up for it yet? >> >> /Lukas >> >> >> >> >> >> *Från:* Andrew Hughes [mailto:ahh...@gm...] >> *Skickat:* den 13 september 2010 15:57 >> *Till:* gwt...@li... >> *Kopia:* gwt...@li... >> *Ämne:* Re: [Gwt-openlayers-users] [Gwt-openlayers-devl] >> GWT-OpenLayersv0.5, let's please do a release... >> >> >> >> Release is fast approaching, 1 minor issue remains but.... >> >> >> >> Would it seem feasible to have this released as v1.0.0 and not 0.5? >> GWT-OpenLayers is quite a mature and feature rich codebase now and I think >> the... >> >> >> >> MAJOR.FEATURE.BUG >> >> >> >> ....convention is far more suitable. >> >> >> >> I also think that the initial impression of a 0.x version indicates that >> the codebase is juvenile and lacks features - I don't believe that to be the >> case here :) >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Edwin Commandeur < >> com...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Hi Andrew, >> >> All for the better if you have progressed on #48. >> >> 12 months between releases is way too long indeed :( >> >> Greetings, >> Edwin >> >> >> On 18 August 2010 12:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: >> > Thanks Edwin, >> > I must confess I did more work on the #trac_ticket_48 branch - naughty >> me. >> > This was two things... >> > 1. I merged the default tip onto the branch (i.e. they are in sync) >> > 2. I added a heap of maven configuration for maven based releases, this >> is >> > something I would really like to do for 0.5.... get a proper release out >> the >> > door and into central. It will also make releasing much easier in the >> future >> > - hence we should look foward to major, minor AND bug fix releases :) >> 12 >> > months between releases with soooooo many new features, fixes e.t.c. is >> too >> > long :) >> > I'll push ahead and try and get this working asap. >> > Cheers :) >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Edwin Commandeur >> > <com...@gm...> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Andrew, >> >> >> >> You are absolutely right, that we should get out a 0.5 release. You >> >> should have the rights to do a release (or alpha release if you like), >> >> but I don't know if you would be okay to arrange the release. >> >> >> >> - panel control => +1 for move to 0.6 (all widget toolkits have >> >> toolbars that are far nicer than the Panel) >> >> - #48 => if you can merge this, I would be all for that! >> >> - other enhancements => +1 for move to 0.6 >> >> >> >> Thanks for all the hard work you have already put into 0.5! >> >> >> >> Sorry for the low activity on my side lately. I hope to get things >> >> rolling again soon... >> >> >> >> Greetings, >> >> Edwin >> >> >> >> On 17 August 2010 08:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: >> >> > Hi All, >> >> > I'd like to propose that we try and get a new release of >> >> > gwt-openlayers. Unless I am mistaken the 0.4 tag was created 12 >> Months >> >> > ago >> >> > :O >> >> > According to trac 0.5 now has... 30 closed issues, 7 of which are >> >> > defects. >> >> > Remaining in 0.5.... >> >> > There are currently 6 Active tickets.... 5 enhancements, and one >> defect. >> >> > Ticket #41 "Panel Control Not Working" >> >> > - https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/41 >> >> > >> >> > I notice that Edwin changed the milestone from 0.5 to 0.6 and then >> back >> >> > to >> >> > 0.5... can this be moved onto 0.6? >> >> > >> >> > Ticket #48 "Project Identifies and Multi Module Maven >> >> > setup" https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/48 >> >> > >> >> > This work's been completed on the >> >> > >> >> > branch... >> http://gwt-openlayers.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/gwt-openlayers/gwt-openlayers/file/46f69b5f9bd5 >> it >> >> > has not been merged with the default/tip yet. I can merge this NOW if >> >> > people >> >> > want (it will help with the release too)? But if people don't want >> this >> >> > in >> >> > 0.5 I can also merge later (onto 0.6). I don't care either way 0.5 or >> >> > 0.6 >> >> > but I don't want 0.5 to get held up any longer. >> >> > >> >> > Ticket's #20, #51, #1, #13 are all enhancements and I don't believe >> they >> >> > should hold up a 0.5 release. Can we please move this into 0.6. >> >> > In summary.... Questions: >> >> > Should I merge down #48 to help with the (maven) release? >> >> > Can ticket #41, #48, #20, #51, #1, #13 be moved into 0.6 so that the >> 0.5 >> >> > release can go ahead? >> >> > If the answer is NO, then can I please do an alpha release... >> >> > 0.5-alpha1? >> >> > CHEERS :) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> > This SF.net email is sponsored by >> >> > >> >> > Make an app they can't live without >> >> > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list >> >> > Gwt...@li... >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances >> and start using them to simplify application deployment and >> accelerate your shift to cloud computing >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gwt-openlayers-users mailing list >> >> Gwt...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-users >> >> > |
|
From: Couzic M. <mik...@gm...> - 2010-09-13 15:18:09
|
Well, it is true there has been many new features since 0.4, but I agree with Lukas, version 1.0 carries a meaning of "Mission Accomplished" and GWT-OpenLayers doesn't cover completely the API of OpenLayers yet. It's not a big deal for us contributors, we have the development environment all set and it's fast and easy (well, most of the time ^^) for us to just implement what's missing when we need it, but a new user would expect a 1.0 version to have all the functionnality he would get by coding directly to the JS API. All in all, I don't think a 0.x version is problematic, I believe users will look at the dynamism of the community more than the version numbers, which are pretty much arbitrary after all. And the project doesn't look so bad on ohloh.net : http://www.ohloh.net/p/gwt-openlayers 2010/9/13 Lukas Johansson <luk...@de...> > I agree with all that you say, but I also think that a 1.0 release would > signal/give a promise that it’s a complete wrap of OpenLayers, which at > least wasn’t true the last time I checked out the code (ended in me sending > a path to the list with new features). Don’t get me wrong you all done a > great job but a 1.0 release promises a lot, are gwt-ol really up for it yet? > > /Lukas > > > > > > *Från:* Andrew Hughes [mailto:ahh...@gm...] > *Skickat:* den 13 september 2010 15:57 > *Till:* gwt...@li... > *Kopia:* gwt...@li... > *Ämne:* Re: [Gwt-openlayers-users] [Gwt-openlayers-devl] > GWT-OpenLayersv0.5, let's please do a release... > > > > Release is fast approaching, 1 minor issue remains but.... > > > > Would it seem feasible to have this released as v1.0.0 and not 0.5? > GWT-OpenLayers is quite a mature and feature rich codebase now and I think > the... > > > > MAJOR.FEATURE.BUG > > > > ....convention is far more suitable. > > > > I also think that the initial impression of a 0.x version indicates that > the codebase is juvenile and lacks features - I don't believe that to be the > case here :) > > > > Cheers > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Edwin Commandeur < > com...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > All for the better if you have progressed on #48. > > 12 months between releases is way too long indeed :( > > Greetings, > Edwin > > > On 18 August 2010 12:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: > > Thanks Edwin, > > I must confess I did more work on the #trac_ticket_48 branch - naughty > me. > > This was two things... > > 1. I merged the default tip onto the branch (i.e. they are in sync) > > 2. I added a heap of maven configuration for maven based releases, this > is > > something I would really like to do for 0.5.... get a proper release out > the > > door and into central. It will also make releasing much easier in the > future > > - hence we should look foward to major, minor AND bug fix releases :) 12 > > months between releases with soooooo many new features, fixes e.t.c. is > too > > long :) > > I'll push ahead and try and get this working asap. > > Cheers :) > > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Edwin Commandeur > > <com...@gm...> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Andrew, > >> > >> You are absolutely right, that we should get out a 0.5 release. You > >> should have the rights to do a release (or alpha release if you like), > >> but I don't know if you would be okay to arrange the release. > >> > >> - panel control => +1 for move to 0.6 (all widget toolkits have > >> toolbars that are far nicer than the Panel) > >> - #48 => if you can merge this, I would be all for that! > >> - other enhancements => +1 for move to 0.6 > >> > >> Thanks for all the hard work you have already put into 0.5! > >> > >> Sorry for the low activity on my side lately. I hope to get things > >> rolling again soon... > >> > >> Greetings, > >> Edwin > >> > >> On 17 August 2010 08:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: > >> > Hi All, > >> > I'd like to propose that we try and get a new release of > >> > gwt-openlayers. Unless I am mistaken the 0.4 tag was created 12 Months > >> > ago > >> > :O > >> > According to trac 0.5 now has... 30 closed issues, 7 of which are > >> > defects. > >> > Remaining in 0.5.... > >> > There are currently 6 Active tickets.... 5 enhancements, and one > defect. > >> > Ticket #41 "Panel Control Not Working" > >> > - https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/41 > >> > > >> > I notice that Edwin changed the milestone from 0.5 to 0.6 and then > back > >> > to > >> > 0.5... can this be moved onto 0.6? > >> > > >> > Ticket #48 "Project Identifies and Multi Module Maven > >> > setup" https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/48 > >> > > >> > This work's been completed on the > >> > > >> > branch... > http://gwt-openlayers.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/gwt-openlayers/gwt-openlayers/file/46f69b5f9bd5 > it > >> > has not been merged with the default/tip yet. I can merge this NOW if > >> > people > >> > want (it will help with the release too)? But if people don't want > this > >> > in > >> > 0.5 I can also merge later (onto 0.6). I don't care either way 0.5 or > >> > 0.6 > >> > but I don't want 0.5 to get held up any longer. > >> > > >> > Ticket's #20, #51, #1, #13 are all enhancements and I don't believe > they > >> > should hold up a 0.5 release. Can we please move this into 0.6. > >> > In summary.... Questions: > >> > Should I merge down #48 to help with the (maven) release? > >> > Can ticket #41, #48, #20, #51, #1, #13 be moved into 0.6 so that the > 0.5 > >> > release can go ahead? > >> > If the answer is NO, then can I please do an alpha release... > >> > 0.5-alpha1? > >> > CHEERS :) > >> > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > This SF.net email is sponsored by > >> > > >> > Make an app they can't live without > >> > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list > >> > Gwt...@li... > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > Gwt-openlayers-users mailing list > Gwt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-users > > |
|
From: Lukas J. <luk...@de...> - 2010-09-13 14:51:16
|
I agree with all that you say, but I also think that a 1.0 release would signal/give a promise that it's a complete wrap of OpenLayers, which at least wasn't true the last time I checked out the code (ended in me sending a path to the list with new features). Don't get me wrong you all done a great job but a 1.0 release promises a lot, are gwt-ol really up for it yet? /Lukas Från: Andrew Hughes [mailto:ahh...@gm...] Skickat: den 13 september 2010 15:57 Till: gwt...@li... Kopia: gwt...@li... Ämne: Re: [Gwt-openlayers-users] [Gwt-openlayers-devl] GWT-OpenLayersv0.5, let's please do a release... Release is fast approaching, 1 minor issue remains but.... Would it seem feasible to have this released as v1.0.0 and not 0.5? GWT-OpenLayers is quite a mature and feature rich codebase now and I think the... MAJOR.FEATURE.BUG ....convention is far more suitable. I also think that the initial impression of a 0.x version indicates that the codebase is juvenile and lacks features - I don't believe that to be the case here :) Cheers On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Edwin Commandeur <com...@gm...> wrote: Hi Andrew, All for the better if you have progressed on #48. 12 months between releases is way too long indeed :( Greetings, Edwin On 18 August 2010 12:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: > Thanks Edwin, > I must confess I did more work on the #trac_ticket_48 branch - naughty me. > This was two things... > 1. I merged the default tip onto the branch (i.e. they are in sync) > 2. I added a heap of maven configuration for maven based releases, this is > something I would really like to do for 0.5.... get a proper release out the > door and into central. It will also make releasing much easier in the future > - hence we should look foward to major, minor AND bug fix releases :) 12 > months between releases with soooooo many new features, fixes e.t.c. is too > long :) > I'll push ahead and try and get this working asap. > Cheers :) > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Edwin Commandeur > <com...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Hi Andrew, >> >> You are absolutely right, that we should get out a 0.5 release. You >> should have the rights to do a release (or alpha release if you like), >> but I don't know if you would be okay to arrange the release. >> >> - panel control => +1 for move to 0.6 (all widget toolkits have >> toolbars that are far nicer than the Panel) >> - #48 => if you can merge this, I would be all for that! >> - other enhancements => +1 for move to 0.6 >> >> Thanks for all the hard work you have already put into 0.5! >> >> Sorry for the low activity on my side lately. I hope to get things >> rolling again soon... >> >> Greetings, >> Edwin >> >> On 17 August 2010 08:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > I'd like to propose that we try and get a new release of >> > gwt-openlayers. Unless I am mistaken the 0.4 tag was created 12 Months >> > ago >> > :O >> > According to trac 0.5 now has... 30 closed issues, 7 of which are >> > defects. >> > Remaining in 0.5.... >> > There are currently 6 Active tickets.... 5 enhancements, and one defect. >> > Ticket #41 "Panel Control Not Working" >> > - https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/41 >> > >> > I notice that Edwin changed the milestone from 0.5 to 0.6 and then back >> > to >> > 0.5... can this be moved onto 0.6? >> > >> > Ticket #48 "Project Identifies and Multi Module Maven >> > setup" https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/48 >> > >> > This work's been completed on the >> > >> > branch... http://gwt-openlayers.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/gwt-openlayers/gwt-openlayers/file/46f69b5f9bd5 it >> > has not been merged with the default/tip yet. I can merge this NOW if >> > people >> > want (it will help with the release too)? But if people don't want this >> > in >> > 0.5 I can also merge later (onto 0.6). I don't care either way 0.5 or >> > 0.6 >> > but I don't want 0.5 to get held up any longer. >> > >> > Ticket's #20, #51, #1, #13 are all enhancements and I don't believe they >> > should hold up a 0.5 release. Can we please move this into 0.6. >> > In summary.... Questions: >> > Should I merge down #48 to help with the (maven) release? >> > Can ticket #41, #48, #20, #51, #1, #13 be moved into 0.6 so that the 0.5 >> > release can go ahead? >> > If the answer is NO, then can I please do an alpha release... >> > 0.5-alpha1? >> > CHEERS :) >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > This SF.net email is sponsored by >> > >> > Make an app they can't live without >> > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list >> > Gwt...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl >> > >> > > > |
|
From: Andrew H. <ahh...@gm...> - 2010-09-13 13:56:54
|
Release is fast approaching, 1 minor issue remains but.... Would it seem feasible to have this released as v1.0.0 and not 0.5? GWT-OpenLayers is quite a mature and feature rich codebase now and I think the... MAJOR.FEATURE.BUG ....convention is far more suitable. I also think that the initial impression of a 0.x version indicates that the codebase is juvenile and lacks features - I don't believe that to be the case here :) Cheers On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Edwin Commandeur < com...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > All for the better if you have progressed on #48. > > 12 months between releases is way too long indeed :( > > Greetings, > Edwin > > On 18 August 2010 12:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: > > Thanks Edwin, > > I must confess I did more work on the #trac_ticket_48 branch - naughty > me. > > This was two things... > > 1. I merged the default tip onto the branch (i.e. they are in sync) > > 2. I added a heap of maven configuration for maven based releases, this > is > > something I would really like to do for 0.5.... get a proper release out > the > > door and into central. It will also make releasing much easier in the > future > > - hence we should look foward to major, minor AND bug fix releases :) 12 > > months between releases with soooooo many new features, fixes e.t.c. is > too > > long :) > > I'll push ahead and try and get this working asap. > > Cheers :) > > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Edwin Commandeur > > <com...@gm...> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Andrew, > >> > >> You are absolutely right, that we should get out a 0.5 release. You > >> should have the rights to do a release (or alpha release if you like), > >> but I don't know if you would be okay to arrange the release. > >> > >> - panel control => +1 for move to 0.6 (all widget toolkits have > >> toolbars that are far nicer than the Panel) > >> - #48 => if you can merge this, I would be all for that! > >> - other enhancements => +1 for move to 0.6 > >> > >> Thanks for all the hard work you have already put into 0.5! > >> > >> Sorry for the low activity on my side lately. I hope to get things > >> rolling again soon... > >> > >> Greetings, > >> Edwin > >> > >> On 17 August 2010 08:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: > >> > Hi All, > >> > I'd like to propose that we try and get a new release of > >> > gwt-openlayers. Unless I am mistaken the 0.4 tag was created 12 Months > >> > ago > >> > :O > >> > According to trac 0.5 now has... 30 closed issues, 7 of which are > >> > defects. > >> > Remaining in 0.5.... > >> > There are currently 6 Active tickets.... 5 enhancements, and one > defect. > >> > Ticket #41 "Panel Control Not Working" > >> > - https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/41 > >> > > >> > I notice that Edwin changed the milestone from 0.5 to 0.6 and then > back > >> > to > >> > 0.5... can this be moved onto 0.6? > >> > > >> > Ticket #48 "Project Identifies and Multi Module Maven > >> > setup" https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/48 > >> > > >> > This work's been completed on the > >> > > >> > branch... > http://gwt-openlayers.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/gwt-openlayers/gwt-openlayers/file/46f69b5f9bd5 > it > >> > has not been merged with the default/tip yet. I can merge this NOW if > >> > people > >> > want (it will help with the release too)? But if people don't want > this > >> > in > >> > 0.5 I can also merge later (onto 0.6). I don't care either way 0.5 or > >> > 0.6 > >> > but I don't want 0.5 to get held up any longer. > >> > > >> > Ticket's #20, #51, #1, #13 are all enhancements and I don't believe > they > >> > should hold up a 0.5 release. Can we please move this into 0.6. > >> > In summary.... Questions: > >> > Should I merge down #48 to help with the (maven) release? > >> > Can ticket #41, #48, #20, #51, #1, #13 be moved into 0.6 so that the > 0.5 > >> > release can go ahead? > >> > If the answer is NO, then can I please do an alpha release... > >> > 0.5-alpha1? > >> > CHEERS :) > >> > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > This SF.net email is sponsored by > >> > > >> > Make an app they can't live without > >> > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list > >> > Gwt...@li... > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl > >> > > >> > > > > > > |
|
From: Edwin C. <com...@gm...> - 2010-08-24 19:19:24
|
Hi Bryce, You have hit upon a bug in the gwt-ol 0.4 jar in SelectFeature.java which wraps the SelectFeature control. This bug has been fixed in the 0.5 snapshot that is for download on the gwt-ol site: http://gwt-openlayers.sourceforge.net/latest/openlayers_gwt-0.5-SNAPSHOT.jar I would recommend using that snapshot. We are working to get a 0.5 release out next week, and it should be a drop-replace to transition from the 0.5 snapshot to the 0.5 release. Greetings, Edwin P.S. If upgrading to the snapshot gives problems you have to give me a shout out and I will upload a bugfix 0.4.1 to SF (still, the 0.5 release is the recommended one to go with and it's release is now really really close). On 24 August 2010 19:14, Fisher, Bryce <bry...@lm...> wrote: > I am using the standard jar download (http://sourceforge.net/projects/gwt-openlayers/files/gwt-openlayers/0.4/openlayers_gwt-0.4.jar/download). I did notice that you publish it as being 321KB and I only get 315KB when I download. Not sure if that is a conversion thing or anything. If you can check the download and let me know if it is all there I would appreciate it. > Thanks, > > Bryce Fisher > Bry...@lm... > 703-466-1483 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Edwin Commandeur [mailto:com...@gm...] > Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 4:17 PM > To: Fisher, Bryce > Cc: gwt-openlayers-users > Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: openlayers_gwt-0.4 > > Hi Brice, > > Are you using the standard jar download, or the snapshot build > (renamed then)? The GWT compiler complains because Java class is > apparently not there. Seems like a bug that should be noticed be > someone in the 0.4 release before (which is out a long time now), so I > cannot imagine this is the standard jar download. I will check the > standard download if that's what you are using. > > A 0.5 release is coming up soon, but you might not have time to wait for that... > > Greetings, > Edwin > > On 20 August 2010 19:45, Fisher, Bryce <bry...@lm...> wrote: >> Hi, whenever I try to compile the project I get the following error: >> >> >> >> [ERROR] Errors in >> jar:file:openlayers_gwt-0.4.jar!/org/gwtopenmaps/openlayers/client/control/SelectFeatureImpl.java >> >> [ERROR] Line 49: Unresolvable native reference to method >> 'onFeatureUnselected' in type >> 'org.gwtopenmaps.openlayers.client.control.SelectFeature.UnselectFeatureListener' >> (did you mean >> 'onFeatureUnselected(Lorg/gwtopenmaps/openlayers/client/util/JSObject;)V'?) >> >> >> >> Anything you can do to help out? >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Bryce Fisher >> >> Bry...@lm... >> >> 703-466-1483 >> >> > |
|
From: Edwin C. <com...@gm...> - 2010-08-20 20:17:24
|
Hi Brice, Are you using the standard jar download, or the snapshot build (renamed then)? The GWT compiler complains because Java class is apparently not there. Seems like a bug that should be noticed be someone in the 0.4 release before (which is out a long time now), so I cannot imagine this is the standard jar download. I will check the standard download if that's what you are using. A 0.5 release is coming up soon, but you might not have time to wait for that... Greetings, Edwin On 20 August 2010 19:45, Fisher, Bryce <bry...@lm...> wrote: > Hi, whenever I try to compile the project I get the following error: > > > > [ERROR] Errors in > jar:file:openlayers_gwt-0.4.jar!/org/gwtopenmaps/openlayers/client/control/SelectFeatureImpl.java > > [ERROR] Line 49: Unresolvable native reference to method > 'onFeatureUnselected' in type > 'org.gwtopenmaps.openlayers.client.control.SelectFeature.UnselectFeatureListener' > (did you mean > 'onFeatureUnselected(Lorg/gwtopenmaps/openlayers/client/util/JSObject;)V'?) > > > > Anything you can do to help out? > > Thanks, > > > > Bryce Fisher > > Bry...@lm... > > 703-466-1483 > > |
|
From: Edwin C. <com...@gm...> - 2010-08-19 18:21:43
|
Hi Andrew, All for the better if you have progressed on #48. 12 months between releases is way too long indeed :( Greetings, Edwin On 18 August 2010 12:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: > Thanks Edwin, > I must confess I did more work on the #trac_ticket_48 branch - naughty me. > This was two things... > 1. I merged the default tip onto the branch (i.e. they are in sync) > 2. I added a heap of maven configuration for maven based releases, this is > something I would really like to do for 0.5.... get a proper release out the > door and into central. It will also make releasing much easier in the future > - hence we should look foward to major, minor AND bug fix releases :) 12 > months between releases with soooooo many new features, fixes e.t.c. is too > long :) > I'll push ahead and try and get this working asap. > Cheers :) > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Edwin Commandeur > <com...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Hi Andrew, >> >> You are absolutely right, that we should get out a 0.5 release. You >> should have the rights to do a release (or alpha release if you like), >> but I don't know if you would be okay to arrange the release. >> >> - panel control => +1 for move to 0.6 (all widget toolkits have >> toolbars that are far nicer than the Panel) >> - #48 => if you can merge this, I would be all for that! >> - other enhancements => +1 for move to 0.6 >> >> Thanks for all the hard work you have already put into 0.5! >> >> Sorry for the low activity on my side lately. I hope to get things >> rolling again soon... >> >> Greetings, >> Edwin >> >> On 17 August 2010 08:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > I'd like to propose that we try and get a new release of >> > gwt-openlayers. Unless I am mistaken the 0.4 tag was created 12 Months >> > ago >> > :O >> > According to trac 0.5 now has... 30 closed issues, 7 of which are >> > defects. >> > Remaining in 0.5.... >> > There are currently 6 Active tickets.... 5 enhancements, and one defect. >> > Ticket #41 "Panel Control Not Working" >> > - https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/41 >> > >> > I notice that Edwin changed the milestone from 0.5 to 0.6 and then back >> > to >> > 0.5... can this be moved onto 0.6? >> > >> > Ticket #48 "Project Identifies and Multi Module Maven >> > setup" https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/48 >> > >> > This work's been completed on the >> > >> > branch... http://gwt-openlayers.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/gwt-openlayers/gwt-openlayers/file/46f69b5f9bd5 it >> > has not been merged with the default/tip yet. I can merge this NOW if >> > people >> > want (it will help with the release too)? But if people don't want this >> > in >> > 0.5 I can also merge later (onto 0.6). I don't care either way 0.5 or >> > 0.6 >> > but I don't want 0.5 to get held up any longer. >> > >> > Ticket's #20, #51, #1, #13 are all enhancements and I don't believe they >> > should hold up a 0.5 release. Can we please move this into 0.6. >> > In summary.... Questions: >> > Should I merge down #48 to help with the (maven) release? >> > Can ticket #41, #48, #20, #51, #1, #13 be moved into 0.6 so that the 0.5 >> > release can go ahead? >> > If the answer is NO, then can I please do an alpha release... >> > 0.5-alpha1? >> > CHEERS :) >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > This SF.net email is sponsored by >> > >> > Make an app they can't live without >> > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list >> > Gwt...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl >> > >> > > > |
|
From: Andrew H. <ahh...@gm...> - 2010-08-18 10:35:31
|
Thanks Edwin, I must confess I did more work on the #trac_ticket_48 branch - naughty me. This was two things... 1. I merged the default tip onto the branch (i.e. they are in sync) 2. I added a heap of maven configuration for maven based releases, this is something I would really like to do for 0.5.... get a proper release out the door and into central. It will also make releasing much easier in the future - hence we should look foward to major, minor AND bug fix releases :) 12 months between releases with soooooo many new features, fixes e.t.c. is too long :) I'll push ahead and try and get this working asap. Cheers :) On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Edwin Commandeur < com...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > You are absolutely right, that we should get out a 0.5 release. You > should have the rights to do a release (or alpha release if you like), > but I don't know if you would be okay to arrange the release. > > - panel control => +1 for move to 0.6 (all widget toolkits have > toolbars that are far nicer than the Panel) > - #48 => if you can merge this, I would be all for that! > - other enhancements => +1 for move to 0.6 > > Thanks for all the hard work you have already put into 0.5! > > Sorry for the low activity on my side lately. I hope to get things > rolling again soon... > > Greetings, > Edwin > > On 17 August 2010 08:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'd like to propose that we try and get a new release of > > gwt-openlayers. Unless I am mistaken the 0.4 tag was created 12 Months > ago > > :O > > According to trac 0.5 now has... 30 closed issues, 7 of which are > defects. > > Remaining in 0.5.... > > There are currently 6 Active tickets.... 5 enhancements, and one defect. > > Ticket #41 "Panel Control Not Working" > > - https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/41 > > > > I notice that Edwin changed the milestone from 0.5 to 0.6 and then back > to > > 0.5... can this be moved onto 0.6? > > > > Ticket #48 "Project Identifies and Multi Module Maven > > setup" https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/48 > > > > This work's been completed on the > > branch... > http://gwt-openlayers.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/gwt-openlayers/gwt-openlayers/file/46f69b5f9bd5 > it > > has not been merged with the default/tip yet. I can merge this NOW if > people > > want (it will help with the release too)? But if people don't want this > in > > 0.5 I can also merge later (onto 0.6). I don't care either way 0.5 or 0.6 > > but I don't want 0.5 to get held up any longer. > > > > Ticket's #20, #51, #1, #13 are all enhancements and I don't believe they > > should hold up a 0.5 release. Can we please move this into 0.6. > > In summary.... Questions: > > Should I merge down #48 to help with the (maven) release? > > Can ticket #41, #48, #20, #51, #1, #13 be moved into 0.6 so that the 0.5 > > release can go ahead? > > If the answer is NO, then can I please do an alpha release... 0.5-alpha1? > > CHEERS :) > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > > > Make an app they can't live without > > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list > > Gwt...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl > > > > > |
|
From: Edwin C. <com...@gm...> - 2010-08-17 13:28:00
|
Hi Andrew, You are absolutely right, that we should get out a 0.5 release. You should have the rights to do a release (or alpha release if you like), but I don't know if you would be okay to arrange the release. - panel control => +1 for move to 0.6 (all widget toolkits have toolbars that are far nicer than the Panel) - #48 => if you can merge this, I would be all for that! - other enhancements => +1 for move to 0.6 Thanks for all the hard work you have already put into 0.5! Sorry for the low activity on my side lately. I hope to get things rolling again soon... Greetings, Edwin On 17 August 2010 08:35, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote: > Hi All, > I'd like to propose that we try and get a new release of > gwt-openlayers. Unless I am mistaken the 0.4 tag was created 12 Months ago > :O > According to trac 0.5 now has... 30 closed issues, 7 of which are defects. > Remaining in 0.5.... > There are currently 6 Active tickets.... 5 enhancements, and one defect. > Ticket #41 "Panel Control Not Working" > - https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/41 > > I notice that Edwin changed the milestone from 0.5 to 0.6 and then back to > 0.5... can this be moved onto 0.6? > > Ticket #48 "Project Identifies and Multi Module Maven > setup" https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/48 > > This work's been completed on the > branch... http://gwt-openlayers.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/gwt-openlayers/gwt-openlayers/file/46f69b5f9bd5 it > has not been merged with the default/tip yet. I can merge this NOW if people > want (it will help with the release too)? But if people don't want this in > 0.5 I can also merge later (onto 0.6). I don't care either way 0.5 or 0.6 > but I don't want 0.5 to get held up any longer. > > Ticket's #20, #51, #1, #13 are all enhancements and I don't believe they > should hold up a 0.5 release. Can we please move this into 0.6. > In summary.... Questions: > Should I merge down #48 to help with the (maven) release? > Can ticket #41, #48, #20, #51, #1, #13 be moved into 0.6 so that the 0.5 > release can go ahead? > If the answer is NO, then can I please do an alpha release... 0.5-alpha1? > CHEERS :) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list > Gwt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl > > |
|
From: Andrew H. <ahh...@gm...> - 2010-08-17 06:35:43
|
Hi All, I'd like to propose that we try and get a new release of gwt-openlayers. Unless I am mistaken the 0.4 tag was created 12 Months ago :O According to trac 0.5 now has... 30 closed issues, 7 of which are defects. Remaining in 0.5.... There are currently 6 Active tickets.... 5 enhancements, and one defect. Ticket #41 "Panel Control Not Working" - https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/41 I notice that Edwin changed the milestone from 0.5 to 0.6 and then back to 0.5... can this be moved onto 0.6? Ticket #48 "Project Identifies and Multi Module Maven setup" https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gwt-openlayers/ticket/48 This work's been completed on the branch... http://gwt-openlayers.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/gwt-openlayers/gwt-openlayers/file/46f69b5f9bd5 it has not been merged with the default/tip yet. I can merge this NOW if people want (it will help with the release too)? But if people don't want this in 0.5 I can also merge later (onto 0.6). I don't care either way 0.5 or 0.6 but I don't want 0.5 to get held up any longer. Ticket's #20, #51, #1, #13 are all enhancements and I don't believe they should hold up a 0.5 release. Can we please move this into 0.6. In summary.... Questions: Should I merge down #48 to help with the (maven) release? Can ticket #41, #48, #20, #51, #1, #13 be moved into 0.6 so that the 0.5 release can go ahead? If the answer is NO, then can I please do an alpha release... 0.5-alpha1? CHEERS :) |
|
From: Hutchins, M. C. <cha...@nr...> - 2010-08-03 18:35:02
|
Does GWT OpenLayers have support for GetLegendGraphic (http://mapserver.org/ogc/wms_server.html ? Thanks, Chad Hutchins Meteorologist Naval Research Laboratory Marine Meteorology Division Monterey, CA |
|
From: Hutchins, M. C. <cha...@nr...> - 2010-08-02 23:37:28
|
I was testing GWT OpenLayers snapshot 0.5 with OpenLayers 2.9.1 and I noticed that double click and mouse wheel were not available. Clicking on the Nav toolbar zoom still works as well as the layer switcher. Is anyone else was seeing this issue? Thanks, Chad Hutchins Meteorologist Naval Research Laboratory Marine Meteorology Division 7 Grace Hopper Ave. Monterey, CA 93943-5502 Email: cha...@nr... |
|
From: Andrew H. <ahh...@gm...> - 2010-07-26 13:47:07
|
Unless I am wrong, it's not possible to listen for "double click" what you
need todo is record the first click's System.currentTimeMillis() in
millisec, and then if the second arrives in a given time frame viola, you
have a double click.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> At the moment, a MapClickListener looks like...
>
> MapClickListener() {
> @Override
> public void onClick(MapClickEvent mapClickEvent) {
>
> }
> }
>
> But there appears to be nothing to distinguish single, double clicks in
> gwt-openlayers... it does appear that openlayers supports this:
>
> http://dev.openlayers.org/releases/OpenLayers-2.9.1/doc/apidocs/files/OpenLayers/Handler/Click-js.html#OpenLayers.Handler.Click.single
>
> Any idea's how this would be best added to gwt-openlayers?
>
>
|
|
From: Andrew H. <ahh...@gm...> - 2010-07-26 04:24:49
|
Hi Guys,
At the moment, a MapClickListener looks like...
MapClickListener() {
@Override
public void onClick(MapClickEvent mapClickEvent) {
}
}
But there appears to be nothing to distinguish single, double clicks in
gwt-openlayers... it does appear that openlayers supports this:
http://dev.openlayers.org/releases/OpenLayers-2.9.1/doc/apidocs/files/OpenLayers/Handler/Click-js.html#OpenLayers.Handler.Click.single
Any idea's how this would be best added to gwt-openlayers?
|
|
From: Andrew H. <ahh...@gm...> - 2010-07-19 14:27:31
|
Hey Jon,
This has all the markings of css (and most likely <table> based layout
issues). Sizing/layout rules of tables are quite different to div's. My
advice would be to get either firefox+firebug or chrome and debug the dom
and css directly. Investing the time to learn either of these tools is very
rewarding :)
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Jon Britton <jon...@go...>wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I've solved my error problem, now I've discovered that my map is there...
> but it has a height of 0px. I've tried the suggestions here but for some
> reason I always get the same result. Here is my code:
>
> VLayout mapLayout = new VLayout();
> mapLayout.setWidth100();
> mapLayout.setHeight100();
> mapLayout.setBackgroundColor("#FFFF99");
> mapWidget = createMap();
> HLayout mapPanel = new HLayout();
> mapPanel.setWidth100();
> mapPanel.setHeight100();
> mapPanel.addChild(mapWidget);
> mapLayout.addMember(mapPanel);
>
> I'm at a loss as to how I should fix this... any help would be appreciated!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jon
>
> On 21 June 2010 16:08, Jon Britton <jon...@go...> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys, thanks for the swift replies.
>>
>> I don't think I've got a problem with SmartGWT after all, GWT-Openlayers
>> has just decided to break for me! I've started a new Eclipse project and
>> now can't get it working at all. I have no idea what's changed, but I get
>> the following error:
>>
>> 16:07:56.995 [ERROR] [testgwt] Unable to load module entry point class
>> org.test.client.Testgwt (see associated exception for details)
>> com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptException: (NOT_FOUND_ERR):
>> NOT_FOUND_ERR: DOM Exception 8
>> code: 8
>> __gwt_ObjectId: 15
>> INDEX_SIZE_ERR: 1
>> DOMSTRING_SIZE_ERR: 2
>> HIERARCHY_REQUEST_ERR: 3
>> WRONG_DOCUMENT_ERR: 4
>> INVALID_CHARACTER_ERR: 5
>> NO_DATA_ALLOWED_ERR: 6
>> NO_MODIFICATION_ALLOWED_ERR: 7
>> NOT_FOUND_ERR: 8
>> NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR: 9
>> INUSE_ATTRIBUTE_ERR: 10
>> INVALID_STATE_ERR: 11
>> SYNTAX_ERR: 12
>> INVALID_MODIFICATION_ERR: 13
>> NAMESPACE_ERR: 14
>> INVALID_ACCESS_ERR: 15
>> VALIDATION_ERR: 16
>> TYPE_MISMATCH_ERR: 17
>> SECURITY_ERR: 18
>> NETWORK_ERR: 19
>> ABORT_ERR: 20
>> URL_MISMATCH_ERR: 21
>> QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR: 22
>> at
>> com.google.gwt.dev.shell.BrowserChannelServer.invokeJavascript(BrowserChannelServer.java:195)
>> at
>> com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpaceOOPHM.doInvoke(ModuleSpaceOOPHM.java:120)
>> at
>> com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.invokeNative(ModuleSpace.java:507)
>> at
>> com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.invokeNativeObject(ModuleSpace.java:264)
>> at
>> com.google.gwt.dev.shell.JavaScriptHost.invokeNativeObject(JavaScriptHost.java:91)
>> at com.google.gwt.dom.client.Node$.appendChild$(Node.java)
>> at com.google.gwt.user.client.DOM.appendChild(DOM.java:60)
>> at
>> com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.ComplexPanel.add(ComplexPanel.java:90)
>> at
>> com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.AbsolutePanel.add(AbsolutePanel.java:75)
>> at org.test.client.Testgwt.onModuleLoad(Testgwt.java:56)
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> at
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>> at
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>> at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.onLoad(ModuleSpace.java:369)
>> at
>> com.google.gwt.dev.shell.OophmSessionHandler.loadModule(OophmSessionHandler.java:185)
>> at
>> com.google.gwt.dev.shell.BrowserChannelServer.processConnection(BrowserChannelServer.java:380)
>> at
>> com.google.gwt.dev.shell.BrowserChannelServer.run(BrowserChannelServer.java:222)
>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21 June 2010 14:43, "Cerávolo, Rafael V.B." <raf...@gm...
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jon,
>>>
>>> I'm using SmartGWT with OpenLayers and it works (almost) fine!
>>>
>>> I'm using with a VLayout, but I suppose it will work with HLayout as
>>> well.
>>>
>>> I'm doing this:
>>>
>>> Layout v_layoutMapa = new VLayout();
>>> this.addMember(v_layoutMapa);
>>> v_layoutMapa.addMember(m_mapWidget);
>>> v_layoutMapa.setWidth100();
>>> v_layoutMapa.setHeight("*");
>>>
>>> where "this" refers to a class that inherits from VLayout.
>>>
>>> But you will have some issues using with SmartGwt (well, actually, I
>>> didn't tested these issues without Smart to see if it is a SmartGwt problem
>>> or a OpenLayers problem):
>>>
>>> - When showing maps inside Tabs (the main tabs like in the SmartGwt
>>> showcase), switching from a tab with a map to another tab, the Features
>>> added to the map keep visible in the other tabs!!! (I solved this by hiding
>>> the map when the OnTabChange event is triggered)
>>> - Sometimes a "ghost" feature (duplicated from another existing
>>> feature) appears on the map when dragging it. Using a Timer for delaying the
>>> draw of the feature solved in some cases, but this problem is still not
>>> solved 100%.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Rafael Ceravolo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/06/2010 08:16, Jon Britton wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm having trouble getting OpenLayers to work with SmartGWT. I've got
>>> a Smart GWT HLayout and I'm trying to add a MapWidget to it, but the map
>>> doesn't appear at all and I get no errors.
>>>
>>> Has anybody else been successful in using GWT-OpenLayers and SmartGWT
>>> together?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gwt-openlayers-users mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gwt-openlayers-users mailing list
>>> Gwt...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Gwt-openlayers-users mailing list
> Gwt...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-users
>
>
|
|
From: Roland S. <Rol...@no...> - 2010-07-19 14:17:56
|
Hi Edwin, Edwin Commandeur wrote: > Hi Roland, > > Thanks for sharing such a nice widget! Really great you released on > Google Code. Can I link to it on the GWT-OL website? > Yes, you may link to it. Anybody that wants to put a link is welcome to it. Thanks and thanks for your work on the GWT-OpenLayers project. Roland > Greetings, > Edwin > > On 16 July 2010 16:48, Roland Schweitzer <Rol...@no...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I got interested in the GWT-OpenLayers project because we needed a >> cross-browser map widget that allows users to select lat/lon rectanges, lat >> and lon lines and points to drive our data visualization web app. In case >> somebody else might find it useful, I've released the code for the widget on >> Google Code. >> >> Here is an example deployment for JavaScript and a deployment using GWT and >> a Flash-based tutorial video. >> >> Cheers, >> Roland >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint >> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? >> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first >> _______________________________________________ >> Gwt-openlayers-users mailing list >> Gwt...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-users >> >> >> |
|
From: Edwin C. <com...@gm...> - 2010-07-18 09:20:51
|
Hi Roland, Thanks for sharing such a nice widget! Really great you released on Google Code. Can I link to it on the GWT-OL website? Greetings, Edwin On 16 July 2010 16:48, Roland Schweitzer <Rol...@no...> wrote: > Hi, > > I got interested in the GWT-OpenLayers project because we needed a > cross-browser map widget that allows users to select lat/lon rectanges, lat > and lon lines and points to drive our data visualization web app. In case > somebody else might find it useful, I've released the code for the widget on > Google Code. > > Here is an example deployment for JavaScript and a deployment using GWT and > a Flash-based tutorial video. > > Cheers, > Roland > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first > _______________________________________________ > Gwt-openlayers-users mailing list > Gwt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-users > > |
|
From: Roland S. <Rol...@no...> - 2010-07-16 15:48:21
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Hi,<br> <br> I got interested in the GWT-OpenLayers project because we needed a cross-browser map widget that allows users to select lat/lon rectanges, lat and lon lines and points to drive our <a href="http://ferret.pmel.noaa.gov/NVODS/">data visualization web app</a>. In case somebody else might find it useful, I've <a href="http://code.google.com/p/referencemap">released the code for the widget on Google Code</a>.<br> <a href="http://code.google.com/p/referencemap"></a><br> Here is an example <a href="http://olmapwidget.appspot.com/OLMapWidget/mapwidget.html">deployment for JavaScript</a> and a <a href="http://olmapwidget.appspot.com/MapExample.html">deployment using GWT</a> and a <a href="http://olmapwidget.appspot.com/RefMapTutorial.swf">Flash-based tutorial video.</a><br> <br> Cheers,<br> Roland<br> </body> </html> |
|
From: Edwin C. <com...@gm...> - 2010-07-16 06:54:20
|
Hi Lukas, Thanks for the patch! The way you are handling arrays seems fine. In GWT 2 the options for working with arrays expanded, but the wrappers are still relevant IMHO, and working well. This is an area that could definitively use some documentation. I see you are also using getPropertyAsArray(). This is a method I still need to look at, because it can run into nasty runtime errors that have to do with casting from JavascriptObject to Java Object. The method seems useful, so I guess it needs to be reimplemented to guard it against runtime exceptions. Greetings, Edwin On 15 July 2010 14:16, Lukas Johansson <luk...@de...> wrote: > Hello Edwin > I just completed my implementation with clickable wmslayers trough WmsGetFeatureInfo. I found that there exists a way to request the data in a machine friendly way (GML) by setting infoFormat to "application/vnd.ogc.gml". This means that I get VectorFeatures straight from the request and therefore can reuse my exists WFS popuprenderers to render popups. No need for HTML templating :) > > While working with the implementation I added setDrilldown, setLayers and setUrls to WmsGetFeatureInfoOptions as well as getFeatures in the GetFeatureInfoListener class. These changes allow me to decide exactly what layers to query and they don't have to be served by the same server, which is the case when using using drilldown. > > I'm quite sure that drilldown and setLayers where added in OL 2.9, but I hope it's ok that I wrapped them as well. > > I'd like some feedback on the methods handling arrays (setLayers and getFeatures) as this is my first time using wrapped arrays in gwt-ol. Is this the way to do it or are there any better patterns? > > /Lukas > > > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Från: Lukas Johansson [mailto:luk...@de...] > Skickat: den 17 juni 2010 10:18 > Till: Edwin Commandeur > Kopia: gwt...@li... > Ämne: Re: [Gwt-openlayers-users] Producing clickable layers from WMS > > Thanx I've totally missed that. I believed that I could request the data in a machine friendly format (for e.g. json). But it must be possible to create a template which will be easier to parse in my app code. > > Thank you! > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Från: Edwin Commandeur [mailto:com...@gm...] > Skickat: den 17 juni 2010 09:19 > Till: Lukas Johansson > Kopia: Couzic Mikael; Philipp Verhoeven; gwt...@li... > Ämne: Re: [Gwt-openlayers-users] Producing clickable layers from WMS > > Hi Lukas, > > In the code in trunk there is a WMSGetFeatureInfo example, similar to > the example you reference. It uses a simple proxy included in the > latest GWT-OL from trunk. > > With WMSGetFeatureInfo you have to be aware that there is no standard > for WMSGetFeatureInfo output. In GeoServer you can define templates > for this output, see here: > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOSDOC/GetFeatureInfo+templates > > It would be great if you want to contribute enhancements back to GWT-OL. > > Greetings, > Edwin > > On 17 June 2010 08:55, Lukas Johansson <luk...@de...> wrote: >> I will within a two weeks add this functionality to our app, (we're >> currently using WFS but need to handle larger amount of data which get >> impossible to load with WFS). >> >> The plan is to use the technique shown in >> http://openlayers.org/dev/examples/getfeatureinfo-popup.html to be able to >> produce popups for WMS-layers as well. >> >> I'm not sure if gwt-ol implements all that I need to use, but if not, I will >> implement those parts myself and send them back as a patch. >> >> /Lukas >> >> Från: Couzic Mikael [mailto:mik...@gm...] >> Skickat: den 16 juni 2010 13:21 >> Till: Philipp Verhoeven >> Kopia: gwt...@li... >> Ämne: Re: [Gwt-openlayers-users] Producing clickable layers from WMS >> >> >> >> Hi Philipp, >> >> I needed this kind of functionnality, but I didn't use WMS, just WFS. >> The idea is to get your polygons from the WFS protocol, and load them into >> your VectorLayer. If your polygons are static, you can even use GML files. >> But I'm not sure that's what you're looking for, as this solution implies >> the WMS is completely independant from the polygons. >> >> Ask me if you want more info, I could even provide you with sample code if >> you want. >> >> Cheers, >> Mikael >> >> 2010/6/16 Philipp Verhoeven <ve...@go...> >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm looking for a solution to make any wms layer clickable. That means that >> there should be areas - which are bounded by a polygon - that show an >> information bubble when hovering over. >> Does anyone have experience in this field? As far as I know gwt-openlayers >> does not support this feature. >> >> I found a suitable example for openlayers using a WFS: >> http://openlayers.org/dev/examples/getfeature-wfs.html >> >> It is possible to add the needed funcionality and build the .jar by myself, >> right?! >> >> I'm thankful for any idea or comment on this. >> >> Cheers, >> Philipp >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate >> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the >> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo >> _______________________________________________ >> Gwt-openlayers-users mailing list >> Gwt...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-users >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate >> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the >> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo >> _______________________________________________ >> Gwt-openlayers-users mailing list >> Gwt...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-users >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > Gwt-openlayers-users mailing list > Gwt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-users > > > |
9 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
