gwt-openlayers-devl

[Gwt-openlayers-devl] SF VCS support

[Aaron N. <ano...@st...>]

Hi all,

I was playing around on SF today and noticed Mercurial under the Code 
menu.  I thought my eyes were playing tricks on me, but, sure enough, SF 
officially supports Git, Mercurial, and Bazaar as of *yesterday*: 
http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2009-03-13-003-35-PR-SV.

Cheers,
~Aaron

Re: [Gwt-openlayers-devl] SF VCS support

[Edwin C. <com...@gm...>]

Hi Aaron,

That is very good news! I would favor Hg over Git, given that Hg is more
widespread in the Java ecosystem (being used for openJDK and openSolaris),
whereas Git is more widespread in the Linux ecosystem. Since GWT is in the
Java ecosystem, I see a more natural fit with Mercurial.

My choice for Hg would thus be mostly political. All three, Git, Hg and
Bazaar are in use for large projects, so I guess they are all three quite
mature. For Git and Hg I understand the tool support is good on Linux as
well as Windows.

My suggestion would still be to proceed as follows:
a) keep enhancing GWT-OpenLayers 0.4 snapshot until mid april (please help
out with bringing up new milestone issues and solving existing milestone
ones).
b) change package name from com.eg.gwt.openLayers to org.gwtxxx.openlayers
or org.xxx.gwtopenlayers (where xxx is to be determined)
c) migrate to Hg or Git
d) release GWT-OpenLayers 0.4-rc1 in mid april
e) release GWT-OpenLayers 0.4

That way we can all play around with Git and Hg, and hold a final poll
before mid april about which distributed VCS and which package name to
choose.

Is everybody ok with moving the version number of GWT-OpenLayers from
0.3.1-SNAPSHOT to 0.4-SNAPSHOT and working towared 0.4-rc1 in april?

The path as I see it in terms of GWT-OpenLayers versions would be:
0.4-SNAPSHOT -> 0.4-rc1 -> 0.4 -> 0.5-SNAPSHOT -> 0.5-rc1 -> 0.5 ->
1.0-SNAPSHOT

OpenLayers 2.8 is already at 72% completion of the tickets for that release.

In terms of functionality supported I see it as follows:
0.4:  GWT-OpenLayers 0.4 supports much of 2.7.
0.5:  It would be nice if we could get GWT-OpenLayers 0.5 to support all
functionality of 2.7 that does not duplicate GWT functionality (such as XML
support), with the exception of certain layer types and some of OpenLayers
2.8
1.0:  GWT-OpenLayers 1.0 should catch up with OpenLayers 2.8 (assuming that
2.8 will be released before GWT-OpenLayers 1.0)

With respect to different layers that GWT-OpenLayers supports it would be
nice if we have people under the developers or testers that actually use
that layers, so they can give feedback from using it in practice. I mostly
use WMS and Vector layers, but I am very happy that support for Google and
OSM are in. Other layers that are high on my list to support are: WorldWind,
Mapserver, and WFS (though I believe connecting to WFS from javascript is
suboptimal). Is there anybody amongst us who would like to work on KaMap,
MapGuide, MultiMap, VirtualEarth, or Yahoo?

Greetings,
Edwin



2009/3/15 Aaron Novstrup <ano...@st...>

> Hi all,
>
> I was playing around on SF today and noticed Mercurial under the Code menu.
>  I thought my eyes were playing tricks on me, but, sure enough, SF
> officially supports Git, Mercurial, and Bazaar as of *yesterday*:
> http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2009-03-13-003-35-PR-SV.
>
> Cheers,
> ~Aaron
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
> powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
> easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
> software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
> Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
> _______________________________________________
> Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list
> Gwt...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl
>
>

Re: [Gwt-openlayers-devl] SF VCS support

[Farrukh N. <fa...@we...>]

Thats great news. I am always delighted by SF's responsiveness.

BTW guys, I am unavailable for helping out for a few days due to a 
family commitment.
If there is anything left for Hg migration when I'm back, then I will be 
glad to help. Thanks.

Edwin Commandeur wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> That is very good news! I would favor Hg over Git, given that Hg is 
> more widespread in the Java ecosystem (being used for openJDK and 
> openSolaris), whereas Git is more widespread in the Linux ecosystem. 
> Since GWT is in the Java ecosystem, I see a more natural fit with 
> Mercurial.
>
> My choice for Hg would thus be mostly political. All three, Git, Hg 
> and Bazaar are in use for large projects, so I guess they are all 
> three quite mature. For Git and Hg I understand the tool support is 
> good on Linux as well as Windows.
>
> My suggestion would still be to proceed as follows:
> a) keep enhancing GWT-OpenLayers 0.4 snapshot until mid april (please 
> help out with bringing up new milestone issues and solving existing 
> milestone ones).
> b) change package name from com.eg.gwt.openLayers to 
> org.gwtxxx.openlayers or org.xxx.gwtopenlayers (where xxx is to be 
> determined)
> c) migrate to Hg or Git
> d) release GWT-OpenLayers 0.4-rc1 in mid april
> e) release GWT-OpenLayers 0.4
>
> That way we can all play around with Git and Hg, and hold a final poll 
> before mid april about which distributed VCS and which package name to 
> choose.
>
> Is everybody ok with moving the version number of GWT-OpenLayers from 
> 0.3.1-SNAPSHOT to 0.4-SNAPSHOT and working towared 0.4-rc1 in april?
>
> The path as I see it in terms of GWT-OpenLayers versions would be:
> 0.4-SNAPSHOT -> 0.4-rc1 -> 0.4 -> 0.5-SNAPSHOT -> 0.5-rc1 -> 0.5 -> 
> 1.0-SNAPSHOT
>
> OpenLayers 2.8 is already at 72% completion of the tickets for that 
> release.
>
> In terms of functionality supported I see it as follows:
> 0.4:  GWT-OpenLayers 0.4 supports much of 2.7.
> 0.5:  It would be nice if we could get GWT-OpenLayers 0.5 to support 
> all functionality of 2.7 that does not duplicate GWT functionality 
> (such as XML support), with the exception of certain layer types and 
> some of OpenLayers 2.8
> 1.0:  GWT-OpenLayers 1.0 should catch up with OpenLayers 2.8 (assuming 
> that 2.8 will be released before GWT-OpenLayers 1.0)
>
> With respect to different layers that GWT-OpenLayers supports it would 
> be nice if we have people under the developers or testers that 
> actually use that layers, so they can give feedback from using it in 
> practice. I mostly use WMS and Vector layers, but I am very happy that 
> support for Google and OSM are in. Other layers that are high on my 
> list to support are: WorldWind, Mapserver, and WFS (though I believe 
> connecting to WFS from javascript is suboptimal). Is there anybody 
> amongst us who would like to work on KaMap, MapGuide, MultiMap, 
> VirtualEarth, or Yahoo?
>
> Greetings,
> Edwin
>
>
>
> 2009/3/15 Aaron Novstrup <ano...@st... 
> <mailto:ano...@st...>>
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I was playing around on SF today and noticed Mercurial under the
>     Code menu.  I thought my eyes were playing tricks on me, but, sure
>     enough, SF officially supports Git, Mercurial, and Bazaar as of
>     *yesterday*:
>     http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2009-03-13-003-35-PR-SV.
>


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com

Re: [Gwt-openlayers-devl] SF VCS support

[Erdem G. <erd...@ya...>]

Hi,

everybody seems to be aligned with SF Hg. that's very good news, 

Edwin's plan sounds good to me, 

kind regards, 



----- Original Message ----
From: Farrukh Najmi <fa...@we...>
To: Edwin Commandeur <com...@gm...>
Cc: gwt...@li...; Aaron Novstrup <ano...@st...>
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 3:04:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Gwt-openlayers-devl] SF VCS support


Thats great news. I am always delighted by SF's responsiveness.

BTW guys, I am unavailable for helping out for a few days due to a 
family commitment.
If there is anything left for Hg migration when I'm back, then I will be 
glad to help. Thanks.

Edwin Commandeur wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> That is very good news! I would favor Hg over Git, given that Hg is 
> more widespread in the Java ecosystem (being used for openJDK and 
> openSolaris), whereas Git is more widespread in the Linux ecosystem. 
> Since GWT is in the Java ecosystem, I see a more natural fit with 
> Mercurial.
>
> My choice for Hg would thus be mostly political. All three, Git, Hg 
> and Bazaar are in use for large projects, so I guess they are all 
> three quite mature. For Git and Hg I understand the tool support is 
> good on Linux as well as Windows.
>
> My suggestion would still be to proceed as follows:
> a) keep enhancing GWT-OpenLayers 0.4 snapshot until mid april (please 
> help out with bringing up new milestone issues and solving existing 
> milestone ones).
> b) change package name from com.eg.gwt.openLayers to 
> org.gwtxxx.openlayers or org.xxx.gwtopenlayers (where xxx is to be 
> determined)
> c) migrate to Hg or Git
> d) release GWT-OpenLayers 0.4-rc1 in mid april
> e) release GWT-OpenLayers 0.4
>
> That way we can all play around with Git and Hg, and hold a final poll 
> before mid april about which distributed VCS and which package name to 
> choose.
>
> Is everybody ok with moving the version number of GWT-OpenLayers from 
> 0.3.1-SNAPSHOT to 0.4-SNAPSHOT and working towared 0.4-rc1 in april?
>
> The path as I see it in terms of GWT-OpenLayers versions would be:
> 0.4-SNAPSHOT -> 0.4-rc1 -> 0.4 -> 0.5-SNAPSHOT -> 0.5-rc1 -> 0.5 -> 
> 1.0-SNAPSHOT
>
> OpenLayers 2.8 is already at 72% completion of the tickets for that 
> release.
>
> In terms of functionality supported I see it as follows:
> 0.4:  GWT-OpenLayers 0.4 supports much of 2.7.
> 0.5:  It would be nice if we could get GWT-OpenLayers 0.5 to support 
> all functionality of 2.7 that does not duplicate GWT functionality 
> (such as XML support), with the exception of certain layer types and 
> some of OpenLayers 2.8
> 1.0:  GWT-OpenLayers 1.0 should catch up with OpenLayers 2.8 (assuming 
> that 2.8 will be released before GWT-OpenLayers 1.0)
>
> With respect to different layers that GWT-OpenLayers supports it would 
> be nice if we have people under the developers or testers that 
> actually use that layers, so they can give feedback from using it in 
> practice. I mostly use WMS and Vector layers, but I am very happy that 
> support for Google and OSM are in. Other layers that are high on my 
> list to support are: WorldWind, Mapserver, and WFS (though I believe 
> connecting to WFS from javascript is suboptimal). Is there anybody 
> amongst us who would like to work on KaMap, MapGuide, MultiMap, 
> VirtualEarth, or Yahoo?
>
> Greetings,
> Edwin
>
>
>
> 2009/3/15 Aaron Novstrup <ano...@st... 
> <mailto:ano...@st...>>
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I was playing around on SF today and noticed Mercurial under the
>     Code menu.  I thought my eyes were playing tricks on me, but, sure
>     enough, SF officially supports Git, Mercurial, and Bazaar as of
>     *yesterday*:
>     http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2009-03-13-003-35-PR-SV.
>


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list
Gwt...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl