From: Jian Lu <jl...@vb...> - 2006-03-15 19:10:43
|
So if we want to incorporate a new qualifier "operon" into either GeneFeature or Transcript, we have to add it to them. Will GUS consider it for future new release? <feature name="gene" table="DoTS::GeneFeature" so="gene"> <qualifier name="allele" /> <qualifier name="citation" /> <qualifier name="evidence" /> <qualifier name="function" /> <qualifier name="gene" handler="standard" method="gene" /> <qualifier name="label" /> <qualifier name="locus_tag" column="source_id" /> <qualifier name="map" /> <qualifier name="note" handler="standard" method="note" /> <qualifier name="old_locus_tag" ignore="true" /> <qualifier name="operon" ignore="true" /> <qualifier name="product" /> <qualifier name="pseudo" column="is_pseudo" /> <qualifier name="phenotype" /> <qualifier name="standard_name" /> <qualifier name="usedin" /> <qualifier name="db_xref" handler="standard" method="dbXRef" /> </feature> Ed Robinson wrote: > The genbank2gus.xml was designed to match all GB features to > tables in GUS. You shouldn't find any GB feature which is not > in the file. You may find some feature attributes which are > not in the file. Feel free to add any attributes you may need. > > The mapping of genbank features to gus tables is not one to > one. GUS was not written to mirror GenBank. > > The genbank2gus.xml file was written as an idealized mapping > for some of the datasets we have seen while working on > ApiComplexan data sets. As such, the file is a good > suggesstion on how to map GenBank features into GUS. However, > it is not the final word on how to handle such a mapping. > Features such as Gene, Exon, and CDS are central to the > working of InsertSequenceFeatures. Thus, you should probably > leave those features pointing at their respective tables. If > you want to change one of the other features to point at a > different table, you should feel free to do so. You should > design a map that allows you to make the best use of the GUS > tables for your own data. > > I hope this helps. If you have any more specific questions > about using the map for your data, please post them. Data > modeling discussions are always lively. > > -ed > > > > ---- Original message ---- > >> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:24:11 -0500 >> From: Jian Lu <jl...@vb...> >> Subject: [GUSDEV] GUS schema to support Genbank features >> To: gus...@li... >> >> Hi GUS, >> >> The GUS 3.5 doesn't support all Genbank features such as >> > "operon". From > >> the mapping file "genbank2gus.xml", we could see "operon" has >> > been > >> included in several feature tables. >> Questions: >> 1. Does "genbank2gus.xml" contain all Genbank features or will? >> 2. How soon GUS schema will support all Genbank features or >> > at least > >> features within genbank2gus.xml >> 3. How will GUS plug-ins support the added Genbank features? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jian Lu >> VBI >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking >> > scripting language > >> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend >> > the live webcast > >> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new >> > coding territory! > >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 >> _______________________________________________ >> Gusdev-gusdev mailing list >> Gus...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gusdev-gusdev >> > ----------------- > Ed Robinson > Center for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases > University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 > ero...@ug.../(706)542.1447/254.8883 > |