From: <Fow...@ep...> - 2006-03-06 20:07:06
|
Hello, I apologize if this is not the correct place to post this question/idea. Briefly, I am a plant molecular biologist that is trying to pick up some rudimentary bioinformatics (eg, relational databases, scripting, etc.) I would like to build a small-scale database that stores and integrates information on a small number of gene families. These families are of interest in my lab's various research projects. The information would be gathered from a few sites on the web, or from manual input (my lab, potentially others). While looking and reading around, I found the GUS home site, and have browsed through it a bit. As a newcomer to this field, I confess some ignorance, but have a possible suggestion/idea and question. My observation is that the information that I'd like to store in the database I am conceiving would all fit in the tables/categories that are present in your schema. However, I don't think that I would ever need all of the complexity that you have available. Would it be possible, or recommendable, to develop a smaller, limited set of tables/categories that is derived from GUS for my application? I am even thinking that it might be useful to develop this smaller schema as a template for a purchased desktop type of database (Filemaker Pro is what I am familiar with), such that non-bioinformatics folks like me could relatively easily develop & maintain lab-specific, small-scale databases. However, by deriving this schema from your GUS (as a standard) might help allow easier eventual expansion or communication of information. please provide criticism, or other thoughts. Is there already something like what I am describing? many thanks, John - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - John E. Fowler Associate Professor, OSU Botany and Plant Pathology Dept. On Sabbatical at the EPA Western Ecology Division, Corvallis email: fow...@ep... Phone: (541) 754-4866 |