From: Eric E. S. <es...@vb...> - 2005-11-03 18:47:28
|
> From: Jian Lu <jl...@vb...> > We have EC numbers loaded into SRes.EnzymeClass and TIGRFAM ids into > SRes.ExternalDatabaseEntry, but we couldn't find a place within GUS > schema to store the relationship of them. This brings up the larger question of how best to integrate 3rd party additions into future GUS releases. Steve Fischer <sfi...@pc...> wrote: > this seems reasonable to me. Is is possible to achieve a consensus on how best to address limitations such as the one Jian Lu's code addresses so that a robust solution can be devised and included in later releases? Perhaps other groups have developed similar (or perhaps totally different) solutions. I would like to see more discussions of this type in this mailing list. We would be more than happy to contribute our enhancements if they could be vetted by the GUS team (and other interested parties) and incorporated into the distribution. While I don't presume that GUS was intended to be a BioPerl-style collaborative project, we would really like to contribute. What can we do to help this happen? Cheers, -- Eric E. Snyder, Ph.D. Virginia Bioinformatics Institute Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA 24061-0447 |