From: Chris T. <cmt...@gm...> - 2005-09-20 23:51:27
|
I'm not sure I understand. Does this mean that the app framework requires= =20 it's own schema on the local db? We have several different research project= s=20 in different departments/organisms at hand. Would this indicate the need fo= r=20 a seperate application framework for each of these? I guess what we're=20 eventually trying to accomplish is setting up GUS as a core facility for an= y=20 project in the University of Missouri system. Most of our data comes from a= =20 core sequencing facility - maybe start with a single app framework=20 installation for this data and bring up other app frameworks for data that= =20 is incorporated from other facilities? What did you mean by "most groups=20 have several users sharing a single GUS database"? Can you give an example? I've tried to read as much of the documentation as possible. Can you direct= =20 me to some information source that might help me out here? Thanks, Chris On 9/16/05, Michael Saffitz <msa...@pc... > wrote: >=20 >=20 > Hi Chris, >=20 > On 9/16/05 7:29 PM, "Chris Topinka" < cmt...@gm...> wrote: >=20 > > The documentation suggests installing the schema and app framework at= =20 > the > > same time using: > > > > build GUS install -append -installDBSchema > > > > will=20 > > > > build GUS install -installDBSchema > > > > work to create the database only? >=20 > No, the "build GUS install" command will always install the app framework= . >=20 > > Why would you want to install the app=20 > > framework on a machine that is serving your database? >=20 > You don't necessarily need to install the app framework on your database > server using the above command. For example, I have a remote database > configured in the gus.config file. -installDBSchema connects to the remot= e > database to install/load the schema there, and installs the app framework= =20 > on > the local database. >=20 > > Is this a good idea? >=20 > If you're the only one using GUS, it may be perfectly fine to have the ap= p=20 >=20 > framework on the same machine as the database, but most groups have=20 > several > users sharing a single GUS database, and consequently don't have the app > framework on the DB server. >=20 > > Is the app framework suitable to be run in a distributed fashion?=20 >=20 > I'm not sure exactly what you mean by this... The app framework isn't=20 > really > designed for a distributed environment beyond support for remote=20 > databases. >=20 > > Can a > > single app framework installation connect many users to the database?= =20 >=20 > In theory, yes, but in most cases each app framework has an individual's > configuration such that as they load data, data provenance issues and > permissions can be handled and tracked appropriately. >=20 >=20 > > I ask this because the documentation says that many users (each with=20 > their > > own installation of the Application Framework) will share the database. > > > > When I install the app framework on other machines can I use:=20 > > > > build GUS install -append > > > > to do this? >=20 > Yes. >=20 > > > > Thanks, > > > > Chris >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20 Christopher M. Topinka NLM-BHIRT Predoctoral Fellow in Computer Science=20 113 Life Sciences Center=20 University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211 (573)-823-0616 cmt...@mi... |