Re: [GUSDEV] duplicate ProjecLink tables

[Michael S. <msa...@pc...>]

Sorry for the confusion-- I filed the original bug on this, but this change
WILL NOT occur in 3.5-- this is mostly a footnote to remember to revisit the
issue for a future release.

-- Mike


On 6/16/05 12:23 PM, "Elisabetta Manduchi" <man...@pc...> wrote:

> 
> I'm pretty sure that this was brought up twice at recent CBIL meetings
> (either the CBIL GUS meeting or the CBIL RAD one) and it was decided that
> the tables should not be merged. However at the moment I do not recall
> what motivated that decision. Does any cbilian remember?
> Elisabetta
> 
> ---
> 
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Steve Fischer wrote:
> 
>> both RAD and DoTS have a ProjectLink tables with the exact same columns.
>> 
>> in 3.5 we will combine this into one table in core.
>> 
>> any objections?
>> 
>> steve
>> 
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
>> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
>> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
>> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gusdev-gusdev mailing list
>> Gus...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gusdev-gusdev
>> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Gusdev-gusdev mailing list
> Gus...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gusdev-gusdev