From: <pi...@pc...> - 2005-03-04 14:33:24
|
We definitely use RNAFeature but I am not so sure about ExonLocation. These are issues that should be raised in the schema discussions because we may want to consolidate the views. Debbie Quoting Ed Robinson <ero...@ug...>: > We've stumbled upon a couple tables/views which seem > redundant. Is anyone using these? > > Dots.ExonLocation - is completely subsumed by the fields in > dots.nalocation. > > Dots.RNAType, vs Dots.RNAFeature, these tables seem to belong > to one concept of a RNAFeature, is anyone using RNAFeature? > We want to use RNAType. > > All and any feedback would be appreciated. > > -Ed > > > > ----------------- > Ed Robinson > Center for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases > University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 > ero...@ug.../(706)542.1447/254.8883 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Gusdev-gusdev mailing list > Gus...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gusdev-gusdev > |