Re: [Gusdev-gusdev] ReviewStatus issues

[<ju...@cs...>]

Steve Fischer <sfi...@pc...> writes:
>
> I am discovering other controlled vocab issues.
>
> First, ReviewStatus.

Speaking of ReviewStatus, I wrote concerning this
field and the DoTS.NAFeature table a few days ago.

Will this field be present in the NAFeature table
in version 3.5?  Is it there now in version 3.2?


> The upshot is that i don't think the GUS install should provide values
> for ReviewStatus.   It should be optional and site specific.

I completely agree. See below.

Thanks, Josef


My previous mail:
=>
=>  From: Josef Jurek <ju...@cs...>
=>  To: gus...@li...
=>  Message-Id: <200...@ga...>
=>  Subject: [Gusdev-gusdev] Another necessary field
=>  Date: Tue,  1 Feb 2005 17:35:11 -0600 (CST)
=>
=>
=>  According to the schema browser, DoTS.NAFeature has
=>  the field review_status_id which of course
=>  points to a row in the table SRes.ReviewStatus.
=>  However, in my installation of GUS, schema version 3.0,
=>  DoTS.NAFeature lacks this field.
=>
=>  Such a thing would be very useful to have to distinguish
=>  between the annotation of the same sequence by
=>  different organizations.
=>
=>  In fact, I could use this field right now.  Does
=>  schema version 3.2 have this field?  If so,
=>  can someone suggest a patch/rebuild method
=>  so that I could at least upgrade the NAFeature
=>  table in my installation?
=>
=>  Thanks, Josef
=>




Josef Jurek, Ph.D.

Daphne Preuss Laboratory
Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology
The University of Chicago
ju...@cs...

voice: (773) 834-3985
fax:   (773) 702-6648