steve wrote:
> 2 It is assigned by default to the appropriate "User Representative" for
> the product. The User Representative is a person on the development team
> that best understands the needs of the product's users.
This is the bit that is slightly worrisome; shouldn't this always, by
definition, be me? If there's someone else who better understands the
needs of our developers, then I'm not doing my job.
Said another way, shouldn't I be the one setting priorities, not (e.g.)
Mark?
Like I said to Mike, I'm willing to give it a whirl, but I wont be
surprised by gross noncompliance (or possibly just uncompliance, i.e. no
usage). Hopefully I'll be wrong.
-Aaron
|