From: steve f. <sfi...@pc...> - 2003-02-10 17:41:50
|
Folks- we are gearing up to be a bit more formal about changing the schema mostly so that we can have distinct releases, which hopefully will be a spread out over time. so while we obviously need to continue our active dialogue in this mail group and other ways, i am hoping that when we actually resolve to make a schema change, we use our bug tracker (see www.gusdb.org) to record the request for the change. let me know how this works steve |
From: Arnaud K. <ax...@sa...> - 2003-02-11 10:10:21
|
Hi sourceforge also has feature requests. Would it make more sense to submit schema changes as new features instead of bugs ? Arnaud steve fischer wrote: > Folks- > > we are gearing up to be a bit more formal about changing the schema > mostly so that we can have distinct releases, which hopefully will be > a spread out over time. > > so while we obviously need to continue our active dialogue in this > mail group and other ways, i am hoping that when we actually resolve > to make a schema change, we use our bug tracker (see www.gusdb.org) to > record the request for the change. > > let me know how this works > > steve > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Gusdev-gusdev mailing list > Gus...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gusdev-gusdev > |
From: steve f. <sfi...@pc...> - 2003-02-11 14:10:11
|
yes, source forge allows us to set up trackers for bugs, features, etc. i had in mind to start out real simple with only one tracker... called bugs, to get the hang of things. we can move to more trackers as needed. or, if you are pretty clear that having one for bugs and one for features will be a good way to start, we can consider that too. steve Arnaud Kerhornou wrote: > Hi > > sourceforge also has feature requests. Would it make more sense to > submit schema changes as new features instead of bugs ? > > Arnaud > > steve fischer wrote: > >> Folks- >> >> we are gearing up to be a bit more formal about changing the schema >> mostly so that we can have distinct releases, which hopefully will be >> a spread out over time. >> >> so while we obviously need to continue our active dialogue in this >> mail group and other ways, i am hoping that when we actually resolve >> to make a schema change, we use our bug tracker (see www.gusdb.org) >> to record the request for the change. >> >> let me know how this works >> >> steve >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: >> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! >> http://www.vasoftware.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Gusdev-gusdev mailing list >> Gus...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gusdev-gusdev >> > > |
From: Arnaud K. <ax...@sa...> - 2003-02-12 14:11:07
|
Hi Steve Why not setting everything right from the beginning ? Instead of using the feature request, another solution is to customize a new tracker "schema request" in sourceforge ? We quite like this idea, anyway let us know what you think about it ? cheers Arnaud steve fischer wrote: > yes, source forge allows us to set up trackers for bugs, features, etc. > > i had in mind to start out real simple with only one tracker... called > bugs, to get the hang of things. we can move to more trackers as > needed. or, if you are pretty clear that having one for bugs and one > for features will be a good way to start, we can consider that too. > > steve > > Arnaud Kerhornou wrote: > >> Hi >> >> sourceforge also has feature requests. Would it make more sense to >> submit schema changes as new features instead of bugs ? >> >> Arnaud >> >> steve fischer wrote: >> >>> Folks- >>> >>> we are gearing up to be a bit more formal about changing the schema >>> mostly so that we can have distinct releases, which hopefully will >>> be a spread out over time. >>> >>> so while we obviously need to continue our active dialogue in this >>> mail group and other ways, i am hoping that when we actually resolve >>> to make a schema change, we use our bug tracker (see www.gusdb.org) >>> to record the request for the change. >>> >>> let me know how this works >>> >>> steve >>> |
From: Steve F. <st...@pc...> - 2003-02-12 14:18:30
|
ok, sure, i'll look in to setting it up. might take a couple of days. steve Arnaud Kerhornou wrote: > Hi Steve > > Why not setting everything right from the beginning ? > Instead of using the feature request, another solution is to customize > a new tracker "schema request" in sourceforge ? We quite like this > idea, anyway let us know what you think about it ? > > cheers > Arnaud > > steve fischer wrote: > >> yes, source forge allows us to set up trackers for bugs, features, etc. >> >> i had in mind to start out real simple with only one tracker... >> called bugs, to get the hang of things. we can move to more trackers >> as needed. or, if you are pretty clear that having one for bugs and >> one for features will be a good way to start, we can consider that too. >> >> steve >> >> Arnaud Kerhornou wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> sourceforge also has feature requests. Would it make more sense to >>> submit schema changes as new features instead of bugs ? >>> >>> Arnaud >>> >>> steve fischer wrote: >>> >>>> Folks- >>>> >>>> we are gearing up to be a bit more formal about changing the schema >>>> mostly so that we can have distinct releases, which hopefully will >>>> be a spread out over time. >>>> >>>> so while we obviously need to continue our active dialogue in this >>>> mail group and other ways, i am hoping that when we actually >>>> resolve to make a schema change, we use our bug tracker (see >>>> www.gusdb.org) to record the request for the change. >>>> >>>> let me know how this works >>>> >>>> steve >>>> > > |
From: Steve F. <st...@pc...> - 2003-02-12 16:18:39
|
OK, i have checked in the changes to the build system, so you can give it a try. steve Arnaud Kerhornou wrote: > Hi Steve > > Why not setting everything right from the beginning ? > Instead of using the feature request, another solution is to customize > a new tracker "schema request" in sourceforge ? We quite like this > idea, anyway let us know what you think about it ? > > cheers > Arnaud > > steve fischer wrote: > >> yes, source forge allows us to set up trackers for bugs, features, etc. >> >> i had in mind to start out real simple with only one tracker... >> called bugs, to get the hang of things. we can move to more trackers >> as needed. or, if you are pretty clear that having one for bugs and >> one for features will be a good way to start, we can consider that too. >> >> steve >> >> Arnaud Kerhornou wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> sourceforge also has feature requests. Would it make more sense to >>> submit schema changes as new features instead of bugs ? >>> >>> Arnaud >>> >>> steve fischer wrote: >>> >>>> Folks- >>>> >>>> we are gearing up to be a bit more formal about changing the schema >>>> mostly so that we can have distinct releases, which hopefully will >>>> be a spread out over time. >>>> >>>> so while we obviously need to continue our active dialogue in this >>>> mail group and other ways, i am hoping that when we actually >>>> resolve to make a schema change, we use our bug tracker (see >>>> www.gusdb.org) to record the request for the change. >>>> >>>> let me know how this works >>>> >>>> steve >>>> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Gusdev-gusdev mailing list > Gus...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gusdev-gusdev > > |