Re: [Gumstix-users] fft

[John P. <pa...@be...>]

Its been a while, but I had fftw, IPP, and an xscale/arm assembly fft (http://www.intel.com/design/network/applnots/30214201.pdf 
) working on the gumstix (as well as several other arm cpu's (e.g. TI- 
OMAP) running linux and windowz ce/mobile).  The IPP is just a little  
faster then the assembly, but not by much...  Both IPP and the  
assembly are magnitudes faster than a good fixed point c implementation.

John

On Oct 10, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Brian Whitman wrote:

> Which fft are gumstix (basic/connex) users using? The fftw in  
> openembedded does not have fixed point, right? Has anyone gotten the  
> Intel IPP XScale stuff working on a basix/connex?
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's  
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win  
> great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in  
> the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/_______________________________________________
> gumstix-users mailing list
> gum...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users