RE: [Gumstix-users] Issues with boa, MMC and expect, maybe latest trunk image?

[John P. <pa...@be...>]

Laker,

# uname -a
Linux gumstix 2.6.11gum #1 Wed Sep 28 14:04:41 EDT 2005 armv5tel unknown

Regarding MMC automount, I modified /etc/inittab to mount the MMC after the
modules are loaded.

<SNIP>
# load up the modules
::sysinit:/etc/init.d/rc.modules

# mount the MMC
null::sysinit:/bin/mount /mnt/mmc
</SNIP>

No help for your other two...

-john



-----Original Message-----
From: gum...@li...
[mailto:gum...@li...] On Behalf Of Laker Netman
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:22 PM
To: gum...@li...
Subject: [Gumstix-users] Issues with boa, MMC and expect, maybe latest trunk
image?

I managed to garf up my original buildroot enough that
I just pulled down a fresh copy into a new directory.
I applied the target changes and busybox mods I prefer
and built it without incident. I'm keeping my tcl and
expect binaries on my MMC. I put sym links in my
buildroot root/bin and root/lib pointing to my MMC to
keep from relinking everything after moving a new
root_fs_arm_nofpu over. Also, I tweaked fstab to auto
mount my MMC.
With the latest download, three things seem to have
cropped up:
1) MMC won't automount.  After I login and "ls
/mnt/mmc" yields nothing. After a "mount -a", poof
it's there. Here's my fstab:
# <file system> <mount pt>     <type>   <options>     
   <dump> <pass>
/dev/mtdblock2  /               jffs2   rw,noatime    
         0       1
proc            /proc           proc    defaults      
         0       0
sysfs           /sys            sysfs   defaults      
         0       0
devpts          /dev/pts        devpts  gid=5,mode=620
         0       0
tmpfs           /tmp            tmpfs   mode=1777     
         0       0
/dev/mmc/mmc0/part1     /mnt/mmc        vfat   
defaults        0       0

2) boa dies. I see the "httpd starting" (not verbatim)
at boot up, but after I couldn't http to it I
discovered the process had died. I haven't touched boa
at all, but had planned to use it for a gui soon...

3) Expect, which had been running reasonably well (I
need to look at that source some day, though) has
started seg faulting on scripts that ran before
against the same binaries. And thanks to C. Hughes for
suggesting socat vs. telnet. Big improvement.

So....
Coincidence?  Separate issues?  What additional info
should I post?

Thanks,
  Laker


	
		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
gumstix-users mailing list
gum...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users