From: Ram K. <rkr...@sh...> - 2011-04-12 14:56:47
|
All, I am having trouble building the omap3-console-image. I have downloaded the recipes from the git repository and am trying to compile with bitbake. I get the following errors. Any suggestions ? Thanks in advance Ram Krishnan ssc@ssc-bgl:~/overo-oe$ bitbake omap3-console-image NOTE: Psyco JIT Compiler (http://psyco.sf.net) not available. Install it to increase performance. NOTE: Handling BitBake files: / (7342/7342) [100 %] Parsing of 7342 .bb files complete (6903 cached, 439 parsed). 7667 targets, 318 skipped, 2 masked, 0 errors. Build Configuration: BB_VERSION = "1.10.2" METADATA_BRANCH = "overo" METADATA_REVISION = "5f79a98" TARGET_ARCH = "arm"and TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi" MACHINE = "overo" DISTRO = "angstrom" DISTRO_VERSION = "2010.7-test-20110412" TARGET_FPU = "hard" NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting ERROR: Build of /home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb do_compile failed NOTE: Preparing runqueue NOTE: Executing runqueue ERROR: Task 4255 (/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb, do_compile) failed with exit code 1 ERROR: '/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb' failed NOTE: Running task 2346 of 5084 (ID: 4255, /home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb, do_compile) NOTE: package docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0: task do_compile: Started ERROR: Function do_compile failed NOTE: Task failed: ('function do_compile failed', '/home/ssc/overo-oe/tmp/work/i686-linux/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0/temp/log.do_compile.2335') ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /home/ssc/overo-oe/tmp/work/i686-linux/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0/temp/log.do_compile.2335 Log data follows: | sed: can't read docbook.cat: No such file or directory | ERROR: Function do_compile failed NOTE: package docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0: task do_compile: Failed ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting ERROR: Build of /home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb do_compile failed ERROR: Task 4255 (/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb, do_compile) failed with exit code 1 ERROR: '/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb' failed ERROR: '/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb' failed |
From: Blake R. <bl...@gm...> - 2011-04-12 18:23:24
|
http://old.nabble.com/omap3-console-image-build-fails-%3A-can't-read-docbook.cat%3A-No-such-file-or-directory-td31245580.html Specifically: It turns out it is caused by this openembedded check in from about two weeks ago: http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-native.inc?id=a1a3a895663ac23c17bdfb9c0ab625dfd75b2717 If you revert that file back, everything builds fine. Not sure if there's better info yet. But reverting to the old version worked for me. Blake -- Blake Ramsdell | http://blakeramsdell.com On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Ram Krishnan <rkr...@sh...>wrote: > All, > > I am having trouble building the omap3-console-image. I have downloaded > the recipes from the git repository and am trying to compile with bitbake. > I get the following errors. > > > Any suggestions ? > > > Thanks in advance > > Ram Krishnan > > > > ssc@ssc-bgl:~/overo-oe$ bitbake omap3-console-image > NOTE: Psyco JIT Compiler (http://psyco.sf.net) not available. Install it > to increase performance. > NOTE: Handling BitBake files: / (7342/7342) [100 %] > Parsing of 7342 .bb files complete (6903 cached, 439 parsed). 7667 targets, > 318 skipped, 2 masked, 0 errors. > > Build Configuration: > BB_VERSION = "1.10.2" > METADATA_BRANCH = "overo" > METADATA_REVISION = "5f79a98" > TARGET_ARCH = "arm"and > TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi" > MACHINE = "overo" > DISTRO = "angstrom" > DISTRO_VERSION = "2010.7-test-20110412" > TARGET_FPU = "hard" > > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies > ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting > ERROR: Build of > /home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/ > docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb do_compile failed > NOTE: Preparing runqueue > NOTE: Executing runqueue > ERROR: Task 4255 > (/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/ > docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb, do_compile) failed with exit code 1 > ERROR: '/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/ > docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb' failed > NOTE: Running task 2346 of 5084 (ID: 4255, > /home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/ > docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb, do_compile) > NOTE: package docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0: task do_compile: > Started > ERROR: Function do_compile failed > NOTE: Task failed: ('function do_compile failed', > '/home/ssc/overo-oe/tmp/work/i686-linux/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0/temp/log.do_compile.2335') > ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: > /home/ssc/overo-oe/tmp/work/i686-linux/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0/temp/log.do_compile.2335 > Log data follows: > | sed: can't read docbook.cat: No such file or directory > | ERROR: Function do_compile failed > NOTE: package docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0: task do_compile: Failed > ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting > ERROR: Build of > /home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/ > docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb do_compile failed > ERROR: Task 4255 > (/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/ > docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb, do_compile) failed with exit code 1 > ERROR: '/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/ > docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb' failed > ERROR: '/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/ > docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb' failed > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > |
From: Trevor W. <two...@gm...> - 2011-04-13 16:54:08
|
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Blake Ramsdell <bl...@gm...> wrote: > Not sure if there's better info yet. But reverting to the old version worked > for me. I encountered the same problem yesterday, and your suggestion fixed this issue for me too. |
From: Chris W. <whi...@gm...> - 2011-04-13 17:51:44
|
So we have an issue with this recipe. Is it a problem that has since been fixed in openembedded and it just hasn't made it into the overo-oe branch? Does someone need to report it to OE, or Angstrom? This seems like a case where having our own branch may be a hindrance to getting it fixed. On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Trevor Woerner <two...@gm...> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Blake Ramsdell <bl...@gm...> wrote: >> Not sure if there's better info yet. But reverting to the old version worked >> for me. > > I encountered the same problem yesterday, and your suggestion fixed > this issue for me too. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > |
From: Neil M. <ne...@gu...> - 2011-04-13 18:36:15
|
Hi Chris, This isn't a problem that I've run into you but I'll take a look at what's going on in the recipe upstream. I'm working out a few other issues caused by the transition from angstrom-2008.1 to angstrom-2010.x which are preventing me from doing a full push. Thanks for your patience. -- Neil On 11-04-13 10:50 AM, Chris Whittenburg wrote: > So we have an issue with this recipe. Is it a problem that has since > been fixed in openembedded and it just hasn't made it into the > overo-oe branch? Does someone need to report it to OE, or Angstrom? > This seems like a case where having our own branch may be a hindrance > to getting it fixed. > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Trevor Woerner<two...@gm...> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Blake Ramsdell<bl...@gm...> wrote: >>> Not sure if there's better info yet. But reverting to the old version worked >>> for me. >> >> I encountered the same problem yesterday, and your suggestion fixed >> this issue for me too. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes >> not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as >> part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. >> Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. >> Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo >> _______________________________________________ >> gumstix-users mailing list >> gum...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users |
From: Trevor W. <two...@gm...> - 2011-04-13 18:50:51
|
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Neil MacMunn <ne...@gu...> wrote: > This isn't a problem that I've run into you but I'll take a look at > what's going on in the recipe upstream. > On 11-04-13 10:50 AM, Chris Whittenburg wrote: >> So we have an issue with this recipe. Is it a problem that has since >> been fixed in openembedded and it just hasn't made it into the >> overo-oe branch? Interestingly enough, when I replied earlier I had started to add a line asking basically the same question as Chris. But as I was adding the question I realized the change Tom Rini made (which is the commit that "broke" the recipe for me) had to have worked for him, otherwise he wouldn't have made it (that's usually a pretty safe assumption). So I'm guessing this must be a problem relating to different build environments. Personally I'm doing my builds in an openSUSE 11.4 VM, which I realize isn't the norm. Is there a way in OE to make allowances for different build environments? Or will there have to be a new solution which works for everyone? |
From: Chris W. <whi...@gm...> - 2011-04-13 19:00:02
|
I'm using 64 bit version of ubuntu 11.04, which should be pretty common? On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Trevor Woerner <two...@gm...> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Neil MacMunn <ne...@gu...> wrote: >> This isn't a problem that I've run into you but I'll take a look at >> what's going on in the recipe upstream. > >> On 11-04-13 10:50 AM, Chris Whittenburg wrote: >>> So we have an issue with this recipe. Is it a problem that has since >>> been fixed in openembedded and it just hasn't made it into the >>> overo-oe branch? > > Interestingly enough, when I replied earlier I had started to add a > line asking basically the same question as Chris. But as I was adding > the question I realized the change Tom Rini made (which is the commit > that "broke" the recipe for me) had to have worked for him, otherwise > he wouldn't have made it (that's usually a pretty safe assumption). > > So I'm guessing this must be a problem relating to different build > environments. Personally I'm doing my builds in an openSUSE 11.4 VM, > which I realize isn't the norm. > > Is there a way in OE to make allowances for different build > environments? Or will there have to be a new solution which works for > everyone? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > |
From: Neil M. <ne...@gu...> - 2011-04-13 21:11:24
|
I can't seem to recreate this issue. Can you checkout BitBake version 1.12.0 and tell me if the problem persists? -- Neil On 11-04-13 11:59 AM, Chris Whittenburg wrote: > I'm using 64 bit version of ubuntu 11.04, which should be pretty common? > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Trevor Woerner<two...@gm...> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Neil MacMunn<ne...@gu...> wrote: >>> This isn't a problem that I've run into you but I'll take a look at >>> what's going on in the recipe upstream. >> >>> On 11-04-13 10:50 AM, Chris Whittenburg wrote: >>>> So we have an issue with this recipe. Is it a problem that has since >>>> been fixed in openembedded and it just hasn't made it into the >>>> overo-oe branch? >> >> Interestingly enough, when I replied earlier I had started to add a >> line asking basically the same question as Chris. But as I was adding >> the question I realized the change Tom Rini made (which is the commit >> that "broke" the recipe for me) had to have worked for him, otherwise >> he wouldn't have made it (that's usually a pretty safe assumption). >> >> So I'm guessing this must be a problem relating to different build >> environments. Personally I'm doing my builds in an openSUSE 11.4 VM, >> which I realize isn't the norm. >> >> Is there a way in OE to make allowances for different build >> environments? Or will there have to be a new solution which works for >> everyone? >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes >> not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as >> part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. >> Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. >> Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo >> _______________________________________________ >> gumstix-users mailing list >> gum...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users |
From: Blake R. <bl...@gm...> - 2011-04-13 21:21:13
|
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Trevor Woerner <two...@gm...> wrote: > Interestingly enough, when I replied earlier I had started to add a > line asking basically the same question as Chris. But as I was adding > the question I realized the change Tom Rini made (which is the commit > that "broke" the recipe for me) had to have worked for him, otherwise > he wouldn't have made it (that's usually a pretty safe assumption). Almost as if the fact that we're using BitBake 1.10.2 instead of 1.12.0 would be relevant. So, for instance, if the single change in Tom's changelist (adding the "subdir" parameter) might be using a new feature not in 1.10.2. The subdir parameter support looks like it was added to BitBake on 1/18/11, which is after the tagged version 1.10.2. http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/bitbake/commit/?id=c7c143cde76cc17fc4830e18e21c89f66cc02af0 Now what? Why are we using the old BitBake to begin with? Won't this constantly be a problem if BitBake continues to be updated and recipes add functionality in the latest version, and we're using 1.10.2? Blake -- Blake Ramsdell | http://blakeramsdell.com |
From: Chris W. <whi...@gm...> - 2011-04-13 21:29:41
|
I thought the same thing when I first ran into the issue. I upgraded to 1.12.0 and still had the problem. I can try it again to see if I still see the issue. On the plus side, using 1.12.0 didn't seem to cause any new problems, so I've been using it since. Are there any reasons we shouldn't start using bitbake 1.12.0 for overo-oe? On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Blake Ramsdell <bl...@gm...> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Trevor Woerner <two...@gm...> wrote: >> Interestingly enough, when I replied earlier I had started to add a >> line asking basically the same question as Chris. But as I was adding >> the question I realized the change Tom Rini made (which is the commit >> that "broke" the recipe for me) had to have worked for him, otherwise >> he wouldn't have made it (that's usually a pretty safe assumption). > > Almost as if the fact that we're using BitBake 1.10.2 instead of > 1.12.0 would be relevant. > > So, for instance, if the single change in Tom's changelist (adding the > "subdir" parameter) might be using a new feature not in 1.10.2. > > The subdir parameter support looks like it was added to BitBake on > 1/18/11, which is after the tagged version 1.10.2. > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/bitbake/commit/?id=c7c143cde76cc17fc4830e18e21c89f66cc02af0 > > Now what? Why are we using the old BitBake to begin with? Won't this > constantly be a problem if BitBake continues to be updated and recipes > add functionality in the latest version, and we're using 1.10.2? > > Blake > -- > Blake Ramsdell | http://blakeramsdell.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting > the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > |
From: Chris W. <whi...@gm...> - 2011-04-14 02:43:01
|
I did a clean, then reverted my docbook-sgml-dtd-native.inc back to the one in the repo, then did a "bitable docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native" and it gets down to the do_compile step, and I get the same error: | + sed -i -e '/ISO 8879/d' -e 's|DTDDECL "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook V3.1//EN"|SGMLDECL|g' docbook.cat | sed: can't read docbook.cat: No such file or directory NOTE: package docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0: task do_compile: Failed If I look in the work directory: ~/overo-oe/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0 Then docbook.cat is there, but it is not in the directory below that where bitbake/sed is looking for it: ~/overo-oe/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-1.0 This is with bitbake 1.12.0 I wonder what could be different between our systems? -chris On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Chris Whittenburg <whi...@gm...> wrote: > I thought the same thing when I first ran into the issue. I upgraded > to 1.12.0 and still had the problem. I can try it again to see if I > still see the issue. > > On the plus side, using 1.12.0 didn't seem to cause any new problems, > so I've been using it since. > > Are there any reasons we shouldn't start using bitbake 1.12.0 for overo-oe? > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Blake Ramsdell <bl...@gm...> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Trevor Woerner <two...@gm...> wrote: >>> Interestingly enough, when I replied earlier I had started to add a >>> line asking basically the same question as Chris. But as I was adding >>> the question I realized the change Tom Rini made (which is the commit >>> that "broke" the recipe for me) had to have worked for him, otherwise >>> he wouldn't have made it (that's usually a pretty safe assumption). >> >> Almost as if the fact that we're using BitBake 1.10.2 instead of >> 1.12.0 would be relevant. >> >> So, for instance, if the single change in Tom's changelist (adding the >> "subdir" parameter) might be using a new feature not in 1.10.2. >> >> The subdir parameter support looks like it was added to BitBake on >> 1/18/11, which is after the tagged version 1.10.2. >> >> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/bitbake/commit/?id=c7c143cde76cc17fc4830e18e21c89f66cc02af0 >> >> Now what? Why are we using the old BitBake to begin with? Won't this >> constantly be a problem if BitBake continues to be updated and recipes >> add functionality in the latest version, and we're using 1.10.2? >> >> Blake >> -- >> Blake Ramsdell | http://blakeramsdell.com >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload >> Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top >> priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve >> application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting >> the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> gumstix-users mailing list >> gum...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users >> > |
From: Blake R. <bl...@gm...> - 2011-04-14 03:23:37
|
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Chris Whittenburg <whi...@gm...> wrote: > I wonder what could be different between our systems? Do we know it works anywhere? Blake -- Blake Ramsdell | http://blakeramsdell.com |
From: Andrew K. <tr...@tr...> - 2011-05-13 13:40:57
|
(just a quick history docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native fails to build with a broken 'sed' command in the buildfile, trying to modify docbook.cat. this issue first showed up April 13) I'm building on Mint 11 (ubuntu 10.10) 64bit on an Intel Core i7, I can confirm this issue still exists with bitbake 1.12.0. Andrew On 4/13/2011 11:23 PM, Blake Ramsdell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Chris Whittenburg > <whi...@gm...> wrote: >> I wonder what could be different between our systems? > Do we know it works anywhere? > > Blake > -- > Blake Ramsdell | http://blakeramsdell.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting > the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users |
From: kris d. <t_...@ya...> - 2011-05-13 19:03:14
|
Hello Andrew, I have the same issue. If you edit the ...../org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-utils/dockbook....bb and change the 3.1 for 4.5 for docbook you will be able to compile. it is a quick fix... I don't know if the software will work, but at least, the compilation is OK. Kris ________________________________ From: Andrew Kirch <tr...@tr...> To: General mailing list for gumstix users. <gum...@li...> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 9:40:04 AM Subject: Re: [Gumstix-users] problems building omap3-console-image (just a quick history docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native fails to build with a broken 'sed' command in the buildfile, trying to modify docbook.cat. this issue first showed up April 13) I'm building on Mint 11 (ubuntu 10.10) 64bit on an Intel Core i7, I can confirm this issue still exists with bitbake 1.12.0. Andrew On 4/13/2011 11:23 PM, Blake Ramsdell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Chris Whittenburg > <whi...@gm...> wrote: >> I wonder what could be different between our systems? > Do we know it works anywhere? > > Blake > -- > Blake Ramsdell | http://blakeramsdell.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting > the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ gumstix-users mailing list gum...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users |
From: kris d. <t_...@ya...> - 2011-05-13 19:35:13
|
My quick fix did not worked... I found something here : http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.gumstix.general/57860 you have to replace the SRC_URl by : SRC_URI = "http://www.docbook.org/sgml/${DTD_VERSION}/docbook-${DTD_VERSION}.zip" S = "${WORKDIR}" seems to work... ________________________________ From: kris duff <t_...@ya...> To: General mailing list for gumstix users. <gum...@li...> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 3:03:07 PM Subject: Re: [Gumstix-users] problems building omap3-console-image Hello Andrew, I have the same issue. If you edit the ...../org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-utils/dockbook....bb and change the 3.1 for 4.5 for docbook you will be able to compile. it is a quick fix... I don't know if the software will work, but at least, the compilation is OK. Kris ________________________________ From: Andrew Kirch <tr...@tr...> To: General mailing list for gumstix users. <gum...@li...> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 9:40:04 AM Subject: Re: [Gumstix-users] problems building omap3-console-image (just a quick history docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native fails to build with a broken 'sed' command in the buildfile, trying to modify docbook.cat. this issue first showed up April 13) I'm building on Mint 11 (ubuntu 10.10) 64bit on an Intel Core i7, I can confirm this issue still exists with bitbake 1.12.0. Andrew On 4/13/2011 11:23 PM, Blake Ramsdell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Chris Whittenburg > <whi...@gm...> wrote: >> I wonder what could be different between our systems? > Do we know it works anywhere? > > Blake > -- > Blake Ramsdell | http://blakeramsdell.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting > the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ gumstix-users mailing list gum...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ gumstix-users mailing list gum...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users |
From: rlboyd <rl...@gm...> - 2011-06-04 01:37:01
|
Ram, I ran into that same problem and found a solution in the following post. Not sure if it is the right solution but it did allow the build to proceed. http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-omap3-console-image-build-fails-%3A-can%27t-read-docbook.cat%3A-No-such-file-or-directory-p31267657.html Be prepared for other issues along the way, I still have not gotten an image to build. I ran into a bunch of md5 checksum errors on a bunch of Linux audio packages that were downloaded, turns out the packages themselves were not valid archives. If you run into this problem, just google the package name and find another mirror for the package, manually download the package, then save it in the sources directory. Hope this helps. R Ram Krishnan wrote: > > All, > > I am having trouble building the omap3-console-image. I have downloaded > the recipes from the git repository and am trying to compile with > bitbake. I get the following errors. > > > Any suggestions ? > > > Thanks in advance > > Ram Krishnan > > > > ssc@ssc-bgl:~/overo-oe$ bitbake omap3-console-image > NOTE: Psyco JIT Compiler (http://psyco.sf.net) not available. Install it > to increase performance. > NOTE: Handling BitBake files: / (7342/7342) [100 %] > Parsing of 7342 .bb files complete (6903 cached, 439 parsed). 7667 > targets, 318 skipped, 2 masked, 0 errors. > > Build Configuration: > BB_VERSION = "1.10.2" > METADATA_BRANCH = "overo" > METADATA_REVISION = "5f79a98" > TARGET_ARCH = "arm"and > TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi" > MACHINE = "overo" > DISTRO = "angstrom" > DISTRO_VERSION = "2010.7-test-20110412" > TARGET_FPU = "hard" > > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies > ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting > ERROR: Build of > /home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb > do_compile failed > NOTE: Preparing runqueue > NOTE: Executing runqueue > ERROR: Task 4255 > (/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb, > do_compile) failed with exit code 1 > ERROR: > '/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb' > failed > NOTE: Running task 2346 of 5084 (ID: 4255, > /home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb, > do_compile) > NOTE: package docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0: task do_compile: > Started > ERROR: Function do_compile failed > NOTE: Task failed: ('function do_compile failed', > '/home/ssc/overo-oe/tmp/work/i686-linux/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0/temp/log.do_compile.2335') > ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: > /home/ssc/overo-oe/tmp/work/i686-linux/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0/temp/log.do_compile.2335 > Log data follows: > | sed: can't read docbook.cat: No such file or directory > | ERROR: Function do_compile failed > NOTE: package docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native-1.0-r2.0: task do_compile: > Failed > ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting > ERROR: Build of > /home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb > do_compile failed > ERROR: Task 4255 > (/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb, > do_compile) failed with exit code 1 > ERROR: > '/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb' > failed > ERROR: > '/home/ssc/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb' > failed > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and > vision. > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/problems-building-omap3-console-image-tp31379962p31769965.html Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: Thormodo <gam...@ho...> - 2011-06-06 08:10:50
|
Hello, That docbook "fix" is simply the reversal of what someone else changed a while back. I used to be able to build the omap-console-image after fixing eeze and docbook, but now I get the error(s?) below. I'm trying to build the "Custom PM kernel" as described here: http://wiki.gumstix.org/index.php?title=Category:How_to_-_Low_Power I changed the line PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-omap3" to PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-omap-pm" Then successfully bitbaked the linux-omap-pm_2.6.38.bb recipe. After that I "just" need to build the console-image So I enter bitbake omap3-console-image . But this then fails showing the errors below. Are these the same audio errors you had? And if so could you (or anyone else ;) ) tell me how to fix it? I can't seem to find (via google) the angstrom-zeroconf-audio packages, if that's what you ment. | Downloading file:/home/maarten/overo-oe/tmp/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv7a/glibc-charmap-utf-8_2.9-r37.4.6_armv7a.ipk. | Package opkg (0.1.8+svnr609-r5.6) installed in root is up to date. | Package angstrom-version (1:2010.7-test-20110606-r6.6) installed in root is up to date. | Package angstrom-feed-configs (1.0-r14.6) installed in root is up to date. | Installing opkg-collateral (1.0-r3.6) to root... | Downloading file:/home/maarten/overo-oe/tmp/deploy/glibc/ipk/all/opkg-collateral_1.0-r3.6_all.ipk. [...Insert loads more Configuring xxx...] | Configuring locale-base-en-us. | Configuring ntpdate. | Configuring alsa-utils. | Collected errors: | * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for angstrom-zeroconf-audio: | * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * | * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package angstrom-zeroconf-audio. | * resolve_conffiles: Existing conffile /home/maarten/overo-oe/tmp/rootfs/omap3-console-image/etc/device_table is different from the conffile in the new package. The new conffile will be placed at /home/maarten/overo-oe/tmp/rootfs/omap3-console-image/etc/device_table-opkg. | ERROR: Function do_rootfs failed NOTE: package omap3-console-image-1.0-r0: task do_rootfs: Failed ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting ERROR: Build of /home/maarten/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/images/omap3-console-image.bb do_rootfs failed ERROR: Task 14 (/home/maarten/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/images/omap3-console-image.bb, do_rootfs) failed with 256 ERROR: '/home/maarten/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/images/omap3-console-image.bb' failed ERROR: '/home/maarten/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/images/omap3-console-image.bb' failed rlboyd wrote: > > Ram, > > I ran into that same problem and found a solution in the following post. > Not sure if it is the right solution but it did allow the build to > proceed. > > http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-omap3-console-image-build-fails-%3A-can%27t-read-docbook.cat%3A-No-such-file-or-directory-p31267657.html > > Be prepared for other issues along the way, I still have not gotten an > image to build. I ran into a bunch of md5 checksum errors on a bunch of > Linux audio packages that were downloaded, turns out the packages > themselves were not valid archives. If you run into this problem, just > google the package name and find another mirror for the package, manually > download the package, then save it in the sources directory. > > Hope this helps. > > R > > > Ram Krishnan wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I am having trouble building the omap3-console-image. I have downloaded >> the recipes from the git repository and am trying to compile with >> bitbake. I get the following errors. >> >> >> Any suggestions ? >> >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> Ram Krishnan >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/problems-building-omap3-console-image-tp31379962p31781310.html Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: Richard B. <rl...@gm...> - 2011-06-06 11:10:49
|
I am currently having the same issue and have not been able to resolve it at this point. Can anyone else provide a possible solution to this problem? On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Thormodo <gam...@ho...> wrote: > > Hello, > > That docbook "fix" is simply the reversal of what someone else changed a > while back. > > I used to be able to build the omap-console-image after fixing eeze and > docbook, but now I get the error(s?) below. > I'm trying to build the "Custom PM kernel" as described here: > http://wiki.gumstix.org/index.php?title=Category:How_to_-_Low_Power > > I changed the line PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-omap3" to > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-omap-pm" > > Then successfully bitbaked the linux-omap-pm_2.6.38.bb recipe. After that I > "just" need to build the console-image > So I enter bitbake omap3-console-image . > > But this then fails showing the errors below. Are these the same audio > errors you had? And if so could you (or anyone else ;) ) tell me how to fix > it? I can't seem to find (via google) the angstrom-zeroconf-audio packages, > if that's what you ment. > > | Downloading > file:/home/maarten/overo-oe/tmp/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv7a/glibc-charmap-utf-8_2.9-r37.4.6_armv7a.ipk. > | Package opkg (0.1.8+svnr609-r5.6) installed in root is up to date. > | Package angstrom-version (1:2010.7-test-20110606-r6.6) installed in root > is up to date. > | Package angstrom-feed-configs (1.0-r14.6) installed in root is up to date. > | Installing opkg-collateral (1.0-r3.6) to root... > | Downloading > file:/home/maarten/overo-oe/tmp/deploy/glibc/ipk/all/opkg-collateral_1.0-r3.6_all.ipk. > > [...Insert loads more Configuring xxx...] > | Configuring locale-base-en-us. > | Configuring ntpdate. > | Configuring alsa-utils. > | Collected errors: > | * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for > angstrom-zeroconf-audio: > | * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * > libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 > (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) > * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 > (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= > 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * > libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 > (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= > 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * > libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 > (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= > 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * > libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 > (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= > 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * > libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 > (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= > 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * > libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 > (>= 1.4.1) * libxtst6 (>= 1.2.0) * libxi6 (>= 1.4.1) * > | * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package angstrom-zeroconf-audio. > | * resolve_conffiles: Existing conffile > /home/maarten/overo-oe/tmp/rootfs/omap3-console-image/etc/device_table is > different from the conffile in the new package. The new conffile will be > placed at > /home/maarten/overo-oe/tmp/rootfs/omap3-console-image/etc/device_table-opkg. > | ERROR: Function do_rootfs failed > NOTE: package omap3-console-image-1.0-r0: task do_rootfs: Failed > ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting > ERROR: Build of > /home/maarten/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/images/omap3-console-image.bb > do_rootfs failed > ERROR: Task 14 > (/home/maarten/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/images/omap3-console-image.bb, > do_rootfs) failed with 256 > ERROR: > '/home/maarten/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/images/omap3-console-image.bb' > failed > ERROR: > '/home/maarten/overo-oe/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/images/omap3-console-image.bb' > failed > > > rlboyd wrote: >> >> Ram, >> >> I ran into that same problem and found a solution in the following post. >> Not sure if it is the right solution but it did allow the build to >> proceed. >> >> http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-omap3-console-image-build-fails-%3A-can%27t-read-docbook.cat%3A-No-such-file-or-directory-p31267657.html >> >> Be prepared for other issues along the way, I still have not gotten an >> image to build. I ran into a bunch of md5 checksum errors on a bunch of >> Linux audio packages that were downloaded, turns out the packages >> themselves were not valid archives. If you run into this problem, just >> google the package name and find another mirror for the package, manually >> download the package, then save it in the sources directory. >> >> Hope this helps. >> >> R >> >> >> Ram Krishnan wrote: >>> >>> All, >>> >>> I am having trouble building the omap3-console-image. I have downloaded >>> the recipes from the git repository and am trying to compile with >>> bitbake. I get the following errors. >>> >>> >>> Any suggestions ? >>> >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> Ram Krishnan >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/problems-building-omap3-console-image-tp31379962p31781310.html > Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. > Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, > secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about. > Get your free trial download today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > |