From: Agustin H. <ah...@gm...> - 2007-03-06 16:26:06
|
Hi everybody! How can i find the the last stable version of kernel 2.6.18? or how can i see if a version is stable? |
From: Arnar B. <ar...@gm...> - 2007-03-06 16:37:24
|
Hi there, Generally speaking, kernel where the second part of the version (like 6 in 2.6.18) are stable versions. 2.7.x is the development version for the 2.8 series. You can find all kernel versions at http://www.kernel.org/ Arnar On 3/6/07, Agustin Huacuz <ah...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi everybody! > > How can i find the the last stable version of kernel 2.6.18? or how can i > see if a version is stable? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > > |
From: Arnar B. <ar...@gm...> - 2007-03-06 16:39:50
|
On 3/6/07, Arnar Birgisson <ar...@gm...> wrote: > Generally speaking, kernel where the second part of the version (like > 6 in 2.6.18) are stable versions. 2.7.x is the development version for > the 2.8 series. Sorry for spamming, I meant to say "where the second part of the version is an even number". Arnar |
From: Jesse W. <jes...@gm...> - 2007-03-06 16:46:45
|
Actually since version 2.6.x the kernel development has mostly been in odd versions. so 2.6.20 should be more stable than 2.6.19. If you are talking about versions of the Gumstix build root reading up here: http://cia.navi.cx/stats/project/gumstix-buildroot should help you figure that out. Generaly the last version before a major feature addition or change is the most stable. On 3/6/07, Arnar Birgisson <ar...@gm...> wrote: > On 3/6/07, Arnar Birgisson <ar...@gm...> wrote: > > Generally speaking, kernel where the second part of the version (like > > 6 in 2.6.18) are stable versions. 2.7.x is the development version for > > the 2.8 series. > > Sorry for spamming, I meant to say "where the second part of the > version is an even number". > > Arnar > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > -- -Jesse W. |
From: Craig H. <cr...@gu...> - 2007-03-06 22:53:10
|
The only "stable" versions of the buildroot are those which are "released" via http://sf.net/projects/gumstix -- any other versions should be considered "development". Obviously, there are often bugs in "released" versions which are subsequently fixed in "devel", but "stable" = "release" = sf.net for gumstix. C On Mar 6, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Jesse Welling wrote: > Actually since version 2.6.x the kernel development has mostly been in > odd versions. so 2.6.20 should be more stable than 2.6.19. If you are > talking about versions of the Gumstix build root reading up here: > http://cia.navi.cx/stats/project/gumstix-buildroot should help you > figure that out. > Generaly the last version before a major feature addition or change is > the most stable. > > On 3/6/07, Arnar Birgisson <ar...@gm...> wrote: >> On 3/6/07, Arnar Birgisson <ar...@gm...> wrote: >>> Generally speaking, kernel where the second part of the version >>> (like >>> 6 in 2.6.18) are stable versions. 2.7.x is the development >>> version for >>> the 2.8 series. >> >> Sorry for spamming, I meant to say "where the second part of the >> version is an even number". >> >> Arnar >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to >> share your >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php? >> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >> _______________________________________________ >> gumstix-users mailing list >> gum...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users >> > > > -- > -Jesse W. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php? > page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users |
From: Steve O. <st...@pr...> - 2007-03-06 18:28:17
Attachments:
steve.vcf
|
Hi, I don't know if this is a FAQ but has it been considered running stable branches where only bug fixes are done ? Trying to get a stable revision seems sometimes to be a bit hit and miss. Cheers Steve. Jesse Welling wrote: > Actually since version 2.6.x the kernel development has mostly been in > odd versions. so 2.6.20 should be more stable than 2.6.19. If you are > talking about versions of the Gumstix build root reading up here: > http://cia.navi.cx/stats/project/gumstix-buildroot should help you > figure that out. > Generaly the last version before a major feature addition or change is > the most stable. > > On 3/6/07, Arnar Birgisson <ar...@gm...> wrote: >> On 3/6/07, Arnar Birgisson <ar...@gm...> wrote: >>> Generally speaking, kernel where the second part of the version (like >>> 6 in 2.6.18) are stable versions. 2.7.x is the development version for >>> the 2.8 series. >> Sorry for spamming, I meant to say "where the second part of the >> version is an even number". >> >> Arnar >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >> _______________________________________________ >> gumstix-users mailing list >> gum...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users >> > > |
From: Craig H. <cr...@gu...> - 2007-03-06 22:54:50
|
On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Steve Osselton wrote: > I don't know if this is a FAQ but has it been considered running > stable branches > where only bug fixes are done ? Trying to get a stable revision > seems sometimes > to be a bit hit and miss. Generally, back-porting individual bugfixes is not something we have the time or resources to do -- it's generally the case that bugfixes arrive via updates to upstream packages, which then get merged into the buildroot and released along with other updates down the road. If we hired all the people we'd need to do bugfix backporting, we wouldn't be able to sell gumstix in low volumes at the prices they're at! C |
From: claudio <wb...@gm...> - 2007-03-06 23:15:10
|
I'm a bit confused. What's the difference between svn.gumstix.com/gumstix-buildroot and svn.rungie.com/svn/gumstix-buildroot ? Thanks Claudio |
From: Craig H. <cr...@gu...> - 2007-03-07 16:05:13
|
On Mar 6, 2007, at 3:15 PM, claudio wrote: > I'm a bit confused. > > What's the difference between svn.gumstix.com/gumstix-buildroot and > svn.rungie.com/svn/gumstix-buildroot ? Nothing -- the 2nd one is the old URL from like 2 years ago. The former is the URL you should use. C |