From: Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gm...> - 2009-08-31 23:04:30
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:19 PM, roystonvasey<mikestocks@...> wrote:
> I've seen activity on the BeagleBoard list for proposals to change the way
> expansion board support is handled for pin muxing and driver support.
> I have two custom boards for the Overo and trying to keep everything
> synchronised is a real problem would it be possible to do something similar
> for the Overo range?
I'm the "sakoman" that is referred to in that thread.
I started the discussion a couple of weeks back on IRC hoping to get
some input from other OMAP3 users so we can jointly come up with a
scheme that has the potential to be accepted upstream.
So the short answer is "yes", and in fact we want to do something that
is common across all OMAP3 machines, not just "similar".