From: Tim M. <ti...@mb...> - 2004-05-13 03:38:46
|
Hi, I tried to apply the patch in the 0.7.1 zip file with a fresh 2.6.4 source tree (there are no -rmk patches for >=2.6.4), and it didn't apply cleanly. I suppose I could manually merge the changes, but I was hoping that someone has a 2.6.4 patch (or better yet, a 2.6.6 patch) that applies cleanly. Does anyone have a recent 2.6 patch that applies cleanly? Thanks, Tim |
From: Gordon K. <go...@gu...> - 2004-05-13 05:10:26
|
Hi, The -gum patches are all built on top of -rmk and -pxa patches that were "inadvisedly applied" inasmuch as they do not apply cleanly; nevertheless, the are functional within the arm/pxa255 domain. I apologize the the sloppiness, but my hope is that when the mmc and udc options are well into the mainline we are able to do a clean diff/patch. I also want to apologize for the lack of archives for this list: at the beginning of the month Benny pointed it out, and I thought I would fix it by setting the archives to a weekly refresh. Obviously it's STILL not working. Peter is looking into why not-- since I can't figure it out. Thanks for bearing with us while we try and get it right. Gordon > -----Original Message----- > From: gum...@li... > [mailto:gum...@li...] On Behalf > Of Tim Meese > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 8:38 PM > To: gum...@li... > Subject: [Gumstix-users] patch in v0.7.1 doesn't apply > cleanly / 2.6.6 patch soon?? > > > Hi, > > I tried to apply the patch in the 0.7.1 zip file with a fresh > 2.6.4 source tree (there are no -rmk patches for >=2.6.4), > and it didn't apply cleanly. I suppose I could manually merge > the changes, but I was hoping that someone has a 2.6.4 patch > (or better yet, a 2.6.6 patch) that applies cleanly. Does > anyone have a recent 2.6 patch that applies cleanly? > > Thanks, > > Tim > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband > Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest > 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click _______________________________________________ gumstix-users mailing list gum...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users |
From: Benny S. <ben...@ma...> - 2004-05-13 08:43:31
|
Hi Tim I can see that Zach (Superlucidity Services) already has released patches to the 2.6.6 There are two patches which can be found on http://gnalm.superlucidity.net/ and http://gumstix.superlucidity.net/ I have not tried it yet but his 2.6.6 rc3 applied cleanly so I guess this one will do the same. Best Regards Benny ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Meese" <ti...@mb...> To: <gum...@li...> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 5:37 AM Subject: [Gumstix-users] patch in v0.7.1 doesn't apply cleanly / 2.6.6 patch soon?? > Hi, > > I tried to apply the patch in the 0.7.1 zip file with a fresh 2.6.4 > source tree (there are no -rmk patches for >=2.6.4), and it didn't apply > cleanly. I suppose I could manually merge the changes, but I was hoping > that someone has a 2.6.4 patch (or better yet, a 2.6.6 patch) that > applies cleanly. Does anyone have a recent 2.6 patch that applies > cleanly? > > Thanks, > > Tim > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband > Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest > 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > |
From: Zach W. <zw...@su...> - 2004-05-13 09:12:52
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
Benny Simonsen wrote: > Hi Tim > > I can see that Zach (Superlucidity Services) already has released > patches to the 2.6.6 There are two patches which can be found on > http://gnalm.superlucidity.net/ and http://gumstix.superlucidity.net/ > I have not tried it yet but his 2.6.6 rc3 applied cleanly so I guess > this one will do the same. Heh, you're ahead of the game. :) Let me be clear about my patches: There is sometimes a big difference between "released" and "announced." In the case of my 2.6.6-rc3 patches, you'll note that I made a couple of minor adjustments that resulted in my finally announcing -gnalm2-gum0, which reflects the fact that my first two stabs at new -gnalm patches (which did get released briefly) didn't quite work out how I'd planned. If you'd grabbed those, you'd have been in for minor headaches; only grab the last "announced" patches, not necessarily the latest "released" patch (unless you are looking for something specific). In the present case, I am still finishing some new material and writing the latest announcement. It will follow shortly after I think it all works. Cheers, Zach Welch Superlucidity Services |