From: LolrusPL <lol...@gm...> - 2010-01-09 23:47:06
|
I've been looking into the gumstix as a great embedded solution and I am particularly interested in the touchscreen capabilities. However, the 4.3" module seems fairly low res in todays world, not to mention the lack of multi-touch on resistive displays. Is the 45-pin connector a standard? Are there sources for other screens, perhaps with a nice high resolution (Something like 800x480). Can the 45-pin interface support multi-touch capacitive displays? Thanks for your help, Harry -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Plans-for-touchscreen-support%2C-sources-for-compatible-modules.-tp27094024p27094024.html Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: Don A. <do...@gu...> - 2010-01-13 18:16:14
|
Harry -- re: standards and LCD's in general: There are none. The Samsung and LG 4.3" LCD screens happen to have the same pins because they were intended as plug-compatible replacements for the small number of consumer electronics companies that use millions of that particular screen type. -- There probably are other screens available that have a higher resolution. A quick check of Google reveals that many displays have the same resolution as ours. -- The touch-screen controller used by Gumstix has an interface for resistive displays, so it won't work with a capacitive display. Don @ Gumstix ==================== On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:46 PM, LolrusPL <lol...@gm...> wrote: > > I've been looking into the gumstix as a great embedded solution and I am > particularly interested in the touchscreen capabilities. However, the 4.3" > module seems fairly low res in todays world, not to mention the lack of > multi-touch on resistive displays. Is the 45-pin connector a standard? Are > there sources for other screens, perhaps with a nice high resolution > (Something like 800x480). Can the 45-pin interface support multi-touch > capacitive displays? > > Thanks for your help, > Harry > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Plans-for-touchscreen-support%2C-sources-for-compatible-modules.-tp27094024p27094024.html > Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community > Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support > A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and > easy > Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > |
From: ekrem <eha...@ho...> - 2010-01-14 07:12:37
|
Yes I think me too 480*272 is very low resulation Gumstix , why dont support 800 * 480 lcd screens I dont understand regrads LolrusPL wrote: > > I've been looking into the gumstix as a great embedded solution and I am > particularly interested in the touchscreen capabilities. However, the 4.3" > module seems fairly low res in todays world, not to mention the lack of > multi-touch on resistive displays. Is the 45-pin connector a standard? Are > there sources for other screens, perhaps with a nice high resolution > (Something like 800x480). Can the 45-pin interface support multi-touch > capacitive displays? > > Thanks for your help, > Harry > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Plans-for-touchscreen-support%2C-sources-for-compatible-modules.-tp27094024p27157150.html Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |