Re: [Guile-sdl-devel] guile-sdl 0.1.3

[Vikram S. <vi...@ww...>]

Hi,

Alex Shinn wrote:

> ... is up on my site, now including Vikram's SDL_rotozoom, with a test

> script and an example implementation of the painter language from

> SICP.  Whereas rotozoom is only two functions in a relatively small
> distribution, SDL_gfxPrimitives is a bit larger and depends on some
> third-party libraries, so I think it should be a separate module.

Will check it out today, in the little time I have. Am getting ready to
move to another city to start working from Monday!! I don't think I'll
have trouble getting hold of a computer but I might go missing for a few
days.

> Things are shaping up, I think the only outstanding issue was the
> constants... should they all be numbers, symbols, or mixed numbers and
> symbols?  Another option I hadn't mentioned is that they all return
> symbols, but accept either numbers or symbols on inputs (and that
> would be lists of symbols for flags).

MY vote is for mixed symbols and numbers.