From: Dominique F. <fo...@gr...> - 2003-12-01 11:39:32
|
Le lundi, 1 d=E9c 2003, =E0 12:26 Europe/Paris, J=FCrgen Kilian a =E9crit = : > Hi > > Stephane Letz wrote: > >> >> Actually dotted note are handled but not with the "." syntax. You can=20= >> use >> 3/8 to represent a dotted quarter note for example. >> > ok, I see. > >> We started with the Basic guido specification that says for tempo tag=20= >> : >> >> \tempo<s,s2> where s2 of the form "x/y=3Dn", thus i just forgot the = "." >> syntax. Do you think it it absolutely necessay to support the "."=20 >> syntax? >> > Because it's already possible to specify dotted notes by their=20 > duration, it would be only some kind of "nice" feature. But it's not=20= > absolutely necessarily needed. > > I guess there are more important things at the moment. We should add a=20= > remark into the GUIDO spec "dotted notes can be represented by a=20 > duration without dots....". Not really: there isn't any ambiguity in case of tempo marking, but on=20= the score it's different to write c/4. and c*3/8: the former is to be=20 written with a dot while the latter may be written using a tie and=20 therefore the 2 notation forms are not equivalent. Dominique |