From: <bas...@ti...> - 2003-02-19 14:43:02
|
Dear GuidoLib developers, I write as a simple Guido user. First of all let me state that I = appeciate your work infinitely. I believe that Guido is almost perfect a = tool for encoding and printing of Renaissance music (my field of = research at Bologna University, Italy), were it not for the following = points: 1) it would be needed a proper graphic symbol for violin clef transposed = at octave lower 2) it would be nice if bars could be automatically numbered 3) it would be needed a proper graphic symbol for longa notes (i. e. = notes 2/1 long) 4) it wouldn't be bad if the meter graphic symbol coulb be kept distinct = from effective barring; this because in Renaissance music the sign "C\" = often means barlines every two semibreve (i. e. \meter<"4/2">, but I = would like if the sign "C\" were displayed instead!) 5) we would need optional diamond and square shape for \noteFormat tag = (I've seen that the attributes were planned in Guido Advanced Format = Specification Draft, so why do not implement them?) 6) one would like to be able to decide over accolades appearance and = shape (ex. "none", "straight brackets", ecc.) 7) it would be needed to have square brackets over groups of notes to = represent ancient "ligaturae" signs 8) it would be needed a \ficta tag to put accidental over notes (wich = means that the accidental was not in the original source, but has been = added by the editor) 9) about the \lyrics tag, it would be better if a series of underscore = (i. e. prolongation of last sillable over more than one note) would be = displayed as a single unbroken dash. I apologize for resembling too much pretending. Actually, all I want to = know is if you think you can tackle with the over stated issues, and how = long it could take to implement the first two points at least (the most = urgent to me!). I'm not expert about mailing lists, and I hope I didn't use this one in = a wrong way. I that case, I beg your pardon once more. Best regards, Cristiano Vaval=E0 |