From: Arshia C. <ars...@an...> - 2016-09-10 10:42:34
|
Dominique, Once again many thanks. You can forget my previous comments on default MARK position. I realise that it depends on the context and the fact that we have dx, dy position as option is sufficient enough for this! And in my case, converting from MusicXML, everything is already there! > On 08 Sep 2016, at 18:16, Dominique Fober <fo...@gr...> wrote: > > >> Le 7 sept. 2016 à 13:28, Arshia Cont <ars...@an...> a écrit : >> >> In my on-going attempts to translate the maximum amount of information possible from MusicXML to Guido, I realised that whereas the MARK tag exists in Guido for Rehearsal Markups, probably its optical result is not currently satisfactory for regular use. >> >> The MARK tag in Guido is a text whereas a real Rehearsal Mark should also render an Enclosure around that text (like most editions). >> >> Such information already exists in the Rehearsal tag of MusicXML: http://usermanuals.musicxml.com/MusicXML/Content/EL-MusicXML-rehearsal.htm >> >> Is it possible/easy to add such closure for MARK tag in Guido? > > that’s done ! > the result is on git, ‘dev’ branch > an example is in gmn-examples/new-tags-v1.63/mark.gmn > Some notes: > - the default mark position has been changed to 2 half-spaces above the staff (was previously similar to the default text position i.e. below the staff), which seems to be the standard rule. > - due to historical (and stupid) reasons, the ‘circle’ and ‘oval’ enclosures are supported at syntactic level but not yet at graphic level. > > Regarding the position, the \mark tag supports dx dy. > — > Dom > >> >> Also, it’d be great to be able to extend MARK parameters and enable POSITION as well since this can be easily inferred from MusicXML. >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> Arshia Cont >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Guidolib-devel mailing list >> Gui...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/guidolib-devel > |